Skip to content

UED-A Videolaryngoscope vs. Glidescope Titanium for Elective Tracheal Intubation

UED-A Videolaryngoscope vs. Glidescope Titanium for Elective Tracheal Intubation: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05721690
Acronym
UED-VLG
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-02-10
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2023-05-13
Last updated
2023-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Brief summary

The present randomized clinical trial wants to compare the efficacy and safety of UED-A videolaryngoscope to Glidescope Titanium for routinely tracheal intubation in 60 adults, in terms of successful rate, no. attempts and manoeuvre duration.

Interventions

DEVICEUED-A Videolaryngoscopy

Tracheal Intubation with UED-A videolaryngoscope

DEVICEGlidescope Videolaryngoscopy

Tracheal Intubation with Glidescope Titanium videolaryngoscope

Sponsors

Campus Bio-Medico University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients candidates for general anesthesia in elective general surgery * Age over 18 years * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to sign informed consent * Paediatric population * ASA physical status IV * Emergency tracheal intubation * Independent Predictors of difficult Videolaryngoscopy (Neck extension \< 80°, macroglossia, interincisor distance \< 3 cm, anatomical alterations of the neck, cardiac surgery, ear-nose-throat surgery)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cormack-Lehane grade15 minutesCormack-Lehane grade observed at videolaryngoscopy Grade 1: Full view of glottis Grade 2: Partial view of glottis Grade 3: Only epiglottis seen, none of glottis seen Grade 4: Neither glottis nor epiglottis seen
Tracheal intubation rate30 minutesSuccessful tracheal intubation rate
Number of attempts30 minutesNumber of attempts for a successful tracheal intubation
Total time of intubation15 minutesTime needed to perform a tracheal intubation from the insertion of the video laryngoscope into the patient mouth
Time to glottis visualization15 minutesTime needed to visualize the glottis from the insertion of the video laryngoscope into the patient mouth

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of of post-laryngoscopy side effects24 hoursRate of of post-laryngoscopy side effects (bleeding, postoperative sore throat and/or dysphonia)
Rate of Desaturation15 minutesRate of Desaturation (spO2 \< 93%) during tracheal intubation attempts
Satisfaction Scale30 minutesClinicians Satisfaction with the use of the videolaryngoscope, expressed by a 0-10 numeric rating scale (0 = the worst videolaryngoscopy ever performed; 10 = the best videolaryngoscopy ever performed)
Rate of External laryngeal pressure15 minutesRate of external laryngeal pressure during laryngoscopy

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026