Arterial Stiffness, Healthy Lifestyle
Conditions
Brief summary
To investigate the acute effects of autoregulated (AR) and non-autoregulated (NAR) BFR exercise on indices of arterial stiffness. AR BFR training devices adjust pressure in the cuff ensuring similar pressure throughout the range of motion when the muscles are contracted (dilatated) and relaxed. NAR BFR training devices do not adjust pressure in the cuff throughout the range of motion when the muscles are contracted and relaxed which cause greater pressures at different points in the range of motion. METHODS: Following a randomized AR or NAR familiarization training session, 20 adults (23±5 years; 7 female) participated in 3 randomized treatment-order sessions with AR-BFR, NAR-BFR, and no- BFR separated by 1-week washout periods. Participants performed 4 sets of dumbbell wall squats to failure using 20% of 1 repetition maximum (1-RM) at 2-second concentric/eccentric cadence. Training limb occlusion pressure (LOP) was set at 60% of supine LOP for both the AT and NAR sessions. Testing before and immediately following the training session included ultrasonography of the carotid artery, applanation tonometry, and blood pressure acquisition. Two-way ANOVAs were used to examine the effects of treatment and the treatment-order interaction on pulse wave velocity (PWV), beta-stiffness index (β-stiff), and arterial compliance (AC). RESULTS: There were no baseline differences in CF- (carotid-femoral) PWV, CR- (carotid-radial) PWV, β-stiff, and AC (all p \> 0.05). CF-PWV increased in the NAR-BFR (mean difference = 0.57±1.12 m/s, p = 0.02) and no-BFR (mean difference = 0.63±1.42 m/s, p = 0.03) groups following the exercise session. CR-PWV increased in the no-BFR (mean difference = 0.82±1.5 m/s, p = 0.03) group. And there was an interaction effect in CFPWV between AR-BFR and NAR-BFR (mean difference = 0.70±1.6 m/s, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: These findings show acute AR-BFR training does not influence indices of arterial stiffness while acute NAR-BRF training increases central stiffness.
Interventions
Measure within & between differences in acute vascular compliance from pre- to post-training with autoregulated BFR, nonautoregulated BFR and no BFR conditions.
Sponsors
Salisbury University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Age 18-40 years old 2. Physically active (\> 6 months of consistent exercise training) 3. Weight stable for previous 6 months (+/-2.5 kg) 4. Female subjects only- reported regular menstrual cycles for the last 2 years
Exclusion criteria
1. BP\>140/90 mmHg 2. BMI\>40 kg/m2 3. Diabetes 4. Familial hypercholesterolemia 5. Past or current history of CHD, stroke or major CVD events. Respiratory diseases (not including asthma), endocrine or metabolic, neurological, or hematological disorders that would compromise the study or the health of the subject. 6. Women must not be pregnant, plan to become pregnant during the study, or be nursing 7. Active renal or liver disease 8. All medications and supplements that influence dependent variables 9. Recent surgery \< 2 months 10. Alcohol abuse 11. Sleep apnea 12. Claustrophobia
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-Stiffness Index | Baseline and 10 minutes after exercise on day 1 | A measurement that compares carotid SBP and DBP with carotid systolic and diastole diameters. |
| Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity | Baseline and 10 minutes after exercise on day 1 | A measurement that records the time difference between the foot of the systolic wave form as it arrives at the carotid and femoral arterial sites. It is measured with an arterial tonometer. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed