Burnout, Self Efficacy
Conditions
Brief summary
Background: Burnout is common among nurses and is related to negative outcomes of medical care. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of Balint group activities in burnout reduction among nurse leaders in a Chinese hospital. Methods: This was a randomised controlled trial with a pre- and post-test. A total of 80 nurse leaders were randomly assigned to either a Balint group (n=40) or a non-Balint group (n=40). Participants in the Balint group completed Balint training for a period of three months. Participants in both groups completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI) and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) at the beginning and end of the study（three months later ）. Balint group members also completed the Group Climate Questionnaire-Short Format the end of the study（three months later ）.
Interventions
OTHERBalint group activities
A Balint group is a working form that focuses on the professional doctor-patient relationship. Participants in the Balint group completed Balint training for a period of at least three months, which included two lectures and 10 small group discussion sessions held once a month for one hour at a time (on Thursdays from 12 to 1 PM). Balint group is a closed group including one to two group leaders and six to twelve participants, with sessions lasting 60 to 90 minutes.
Sponsors
Peking University People's Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. nurse leaders in clinical departments 2. voluntary participation
Exclusion criteria
a. previous participation in Balint groups
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) subscale emotional exhaustion (MBI-EE) | The first time for participants in both groups was assessed the MBI-EE questionnaire at baseline. | Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) includes 22 items across three domains: emotional exhaustion (EE; 9 items), depersonalization (DP; 5 items), and personal accomplishment (PA; 8 items). The scoring range for each item is 0 (never felt) to 6 (felt every day). The EE subscale evaluates the feeling of excessive emotional stress and exhaustion due to work, which is characterized by mental, emotional, and physical exhaustion |
| Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) subscale depersonalization (MBI-DP) | The first time for participants in both groups was assessed the MBI-DP questionnaire at baseline. | Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) includes 22 items across three domains: emotional exhaustion (EE; 9 items), depersonalization (DP; 5 items), and personal accomplishment (PA; 8 items). The scoring range for each item is 0 (never felt) to 6 (felt every day). The DP subscale measures unsympathetic and impersonal response to patients, and is regarded as a form of alienation. |
| Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) subscale personal accomplishment (MBI- PA) | The first time for participants in both groups was assessed the MBI-PA questionnaire at baseline. | Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) includes 22 items across three domains: emotional exhaustion (EE; 9 items), depersonalization (DP; 5 items), and personal accomplishment (PA; 8 items). The scoring range for each item is 0 (never felt) to 6 (felt every day). The PA subscale assesses work-related ability and sense of accomplishment . |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) | The first time for participants in both groups was assessed the GSES questionnaire at baseline. | The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) is a 10-item scale used to measure individuals' overall self-confidence in dealing with different environmental challenges or unprecedented situations. Participants are asked to rate 10 questions by choosing one of four response options: 1 (completely incorrect), 2 (almost incorrect), 3 (relatively correct), or 4 (completely correct). A higher score indicates a higher level of general self-efficacy. |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed