Skip to content

Continuous Quality Improvement Cohorts on Advanced Access

Impact of Externally Facilitated Continuous Quality Improvement Cohorts on Advanced Access to Support Primary Healthcare Teams

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05715151
Enrollment
48
Registered
2023-02-06
Start date
2022-09-21
Completion date
2025-06-01
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Health Care

Keywords

Advanced Access, Primary Health Care, Quality improvement

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the implementation and effects of CQI cohorts on AA for PHC clinics. The main questions it aims to answer are to assess the effectiveness of CQI cohorts on AA outcomes.

Detailed description

SIGNIFICANCE AND PURPOSE: Timely access to primary healthcare is one cornerstone of strong primary healthcare. Across Canada, timely access remains a significant challenge. One of the most highly recommended models around the world to improve timely access is advanced access (AA). Over the last two decades, AA has become increasingly popular in Canada. AA model has been widely promoted by the College of Family Physicians of Canada and several other provincial organizations and professional associations. Some tools to support the implementation of AA to PHC providers and practices have been developed such as workbook by Health Quality Ontario and Doctor of BC. However, those tools are important assets to initiate a reflection to improve, they are often not sufficient. Eight PHC teams interested in improving and expanding the implementation of AA have been coached through several PDSA cycles. However, the personalized support model used is very demanding in terms of capacity and resources. These findings guided the research team in developing and evaluating a Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Cohort program on advanced access to support Primary healthcare (PHC) teams.This study aims to develop knowledge on an externally facilitated CQI pan-Canadian cohort program that could potentially be transferred to provincial organizations or professional associations wishing to support clinics in quality improvement projects. OBJECTIVE: Assess the effectiveness of CQI cohorts on AA outcomes. QI INTERVENTION PROGRAM: PHC teams will participate in an externally facilitated CQI program focusing on AA. The proposed program consists of cycle of three key activities; 1) Interprofessional reflective sessions and need prioritization, 2) Group mentoring and PDSA Cycles and 3) Cohort cross-learning exchange opportunities. METHODS: This study will be based on the cluster-controlled trial of a CQI program of PHC teams on AA. 48 PHC teams from Quebec will participate to the externally facilitated CQI cohort intervention. Volunteer clinics from the intervention regions will receive the CQI intervention for 18 months. Intervention clinics will be matched to PHC clinics located in other regions to compose the control group. The match will be based on the clinic level (1 to 10, based on the number of patients registered and services offered. Clinics in the control group will receive an audit on a selection of AA indicators and will be offered the intervention 12 to 18 months following their recruitment. Data collection and analysis will include quantitative data based on a comprehensive assessment of both AA processes and outcomes. These will be measured through a self-reflective survey for PHC team members, EMR data and patients related outcomes questionnaire on access. Qualitative data based on semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, observations of the CQI activities and analysis of plans of action of documents plan of action will take place.

Interventions

OTHERCQI intervention

Activity 1: Reflective sessions and problem prioritisation. Activity 2: PDSA cycles. Activity 3: Group mentoring.

Audit and Feedback on six key AA indicators, patients reported experience about access and selected AA processes.

Sponsors

Isabelle Gaboury
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Mike Green
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Tara Kiran
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Janusz Kaczorowski
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Maude Laberge
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Université de Sherbrooke
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Clinics must offer interprofessional care. * At least 50 % of all team members should accept to take part in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Solo Practice Physicians * Physician-nurse only model

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
3rd next available appointment (weekly)18 monthDelay before the 3rd next available appointment. The 3rd next available appointment is used (rather than the 1st or 2nd) to decrease variation.
Percent of relational continuity (monthly)18 monthTotal number of medical consultations with a patient's attached family physician (or specialised nurse) out of the total number of consultations with any family physician (or specialised nurse) from the clinic. Evaluates relational continuity between the provider and their registered patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of multidisciplinary involvement (monthly)18 monthEvaluates the proportion of involvement of different types of providers (social workers, nurses, pharmacists, etc.) with registered patients.
Discontinuity for chronic patients (monthly)18 monthProportion of chronic patients without any consultations within the last 12 months.
Percent of 48-hour open slots (weekly)18 monthProportion of appointments available in the next 48 hours. Provides an overview of the provider's ability to respond to urgent care demands.
Percent of relational continuity (monthly)12 monthTotal number of medical consultations with a patient's attached family physician (or specialised nurse) out of the total number of consultations with any family physician (or specialised nurse) from the clinic. Evaluates relational continuity between the provider and their registered patients.
3rd next available appointment (weekly)12 monthDelay before the 3rd next available appointment. The 3rd next available appointment is used (rather than the 1st or 2nd) to decrease variation.
Use of walk-in (monthly)18 monthProportion of walk-in visits by registered patients to each professional.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactElisabeth Martin, Ph.D(c)
elisabeth.martin@usherbrooke.ca5147799926

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026