Skip to content

Graded Motor Imagery and Fall Risk in Older Adults

Graded Motor Imagery and Fall Risk in Older Adults: An Exploratory Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05715112
Acronym
GMI
Enrollment
42
Registered
2023-02-06
Start date
2022-08-17
Completion date
2022-08-18
Last updated
2023-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Balance, Fall Risk

Keywords

Graded Motor Imagery, Balance, Fall Risk, Elderly

Brief summary

To determine if there is any carry over effect of sensation training for the feet, officially called Graded Motor Imagery (GMI), will impact balance and fall risk factors in older individuals. This will be looked at to see if there is a difference in balance and sensation before and right after the training.

Detailed description

In order to increase acuity of body maps, various tactile and movement-based strategies have been recommended and supported for research focusing on sensory discrimination. Current evidence, specific to painful conditions related to altered cortical mapping, have shown growing evidence in reducing pain and disability. In regards to it's ability to alter foot pain in older adults and decreasing fall risk, prior conference case study and case series presentations have suggested potential clinical benefit, but it has not been formally studied. The aim of this study is to determine if a sensory discrimination training for feet in older adults can alleviate pain, improve sensory discrimination, and also decrease fall risk. Specifically, does a 20 minute training session improve pain, balance (Brief-BEST test), and sensory discrimination in individuals over 65 years of age. Secondary analysis may exam characteristics that best identify those who benefit from this training.

Interventions

GMI consisting of education, sensory integration of the foot using contact, flooring samples, immersion, and two point discrimination.

Sponsors

St. Ambrose University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Be able to read and understand English * Be over the age of 65 * Be independent with ambulation (with or without an assistive device) * Not have any skin condition or injury to the plantar or dorsal part of the foot * Have the visual ability to view images on a tablet to partake in a test

Exclusion criteria

* No existing skin conditions on the bottom of the foot that would impair sensation * No current injury to the plantar or dorsal side of the foot * No prior surgery or major injury to the plantar or dorsal side of the foot * Lacking sensation in the foot * Unable to read and understand English * Lacking ability to view images on a tablet to partake in a test * Unable to ambulate (with or without an assistive device)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lower extremity pain ratingself-reported, change from before to immediately after treatmentChange (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in pain for the lower extremity using the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS - 0 to 10 where 0 = no pain and 10 + maximum pain)
Laterality Speedtested for 60 seconds before and immediately after treatmentChange (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in speed of foot recognition using Recognize (TM) (speed in seconds to recognize each of 40 images as right or left foot)
Laterality Accuracytested for 60 seconds before and immediately after treatmentChange (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in accuracy of foot recognition using Recognize (TM) (percent accurately correctly identified as right or left foot of those 40 images)
Balance / fall riskAssessed before and immediately after treatmentChange (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Brief-BESTest (6 task subsets to assess static and dynamic balance) (0 - 15 scale where 0 - lowest score / unstable and 15 = highest / no balance issues)
Nerve Sensitivity Dorsum of dominant handAssessed before and immediately after treatmentChange (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) on dorsum of web space of dominant hand (in pounds)
Nerve Sensitivity Dorsum of Right FootAssessed before and immediately after treatmentChange (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) on dorsum of right foot (in pounds)
Nerve Sensitivity Dorsum of Left FootAssessed before and immediately after treatmentChange (from before treatment to immediately after treatment) in Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) on dorsum of left foot (in pounds)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026