Skip to content

Changes in the Force-velocity Relationship of Knee Muscles After ACL Reconstruction

Changes in the Force-velocity Relationship of Knee Muscles After ACL Reconstruction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05712109
Acronym
FoVeA
Enrollment
103
Registered
2023-02-03
Start date
2017-01-15
Completion date
2023-02-05
Last updated
2025-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Muscle Weakness

Brief summary

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a frequent and devastating injury in sport, especially in pivoting-contact disciplines. In many cases, athletes will undergo an ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) for recovering knee stability, preventing further injuries and returning to sport (RTS). Among the criteria for RTS, knee muscle strength is the most used objective criteria and especially the symmetry of knee flexors and/or extensors between the operated and uninjured knee. Isokinetic testing of knee muscle strength is considered as a reference for knee muscle testing during the follow up stages after ACL-R. This evaluation allows to measure the strength (torque) of knee flexors and extensors at several angular velocities. However, there is no relevant litterature about the force-velocity (Fo-v) relationship of knee flexors and extensors after ACL-R. The present study aimed to evaluate and test the differences between the Fo-v relationship parameters between the operated and uninjured knees at 4 months and 8 months after ACL-R, using the 2-points method with isokinetic testing. Also, the investigators aimed to test the impact of the type of surgery (patellar tendon autograft vs. hamstring tendon autograft) on the Fo-v relationship after ACL-R

Interventions

OTHERFollow-up after Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The patients were referred to the sport medicine department for the post ACL-R follow-up including isokinetic knee muscle strength evaluations at 4 months and 8.months after the surgery

Sponsors

University Hospital, Caen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who have had an ACL reconstruction surgery (isolated or associated with other meniscal or ligamentary surgery) * Patient included in the sport medicine follow-up protocole with intermediate and final isokinetic muscular assessment at 4 months and8 months after surgery respectively * Patients who completed both tests at the 60°/s and 240°/s velocities

Exclusion criteria

* Patient who did not participate in all follow-up consultations and isokinetic muscular assessments * Cognitive or sensory impairment making it impossible to understand the information form * Neurological, traumatic or osteoarticular history responsible for muscle imbalance prior to surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in strengthTime Frame: ACL group: Two evaluations on both injured and healthy knees: (1) 4 months after surgery and (2) 8 months after surgery; Routine practice following guidelinesMeasurement of knee extensors and flexors peak strength (in newton.meter, Nm) on isokinetic dynamometer at two angular velocities of 60°/s and 240°/s respectively
Change in the force-velocity relationshipTime Frame: ACL group: Two evaluations on both injured and healthy knees: (1) 4 months after surgery and (2) 8 months after surgery; Routine practice following guidelinesCalculation of the corresponding slope and maximal force (Y-intercept) of the regression line of the force-velocity curve

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Individual characteristicsTime Frame: ACL group: Two evaluations on both injured and healthy knees: (1) 4 months after surgery and (2) 8 months after surgery; Routine practice following guidelinesPersonal characteristics recorded in the medical report as age, gender, type of sport and sport level of practice and return to sport after the surgery
Injury characteristicsTime Frame: ACL group: Two evaluations on both injured and healthy knees: (1) 4 months after surgery and (2) 8 months after surgery; Routine practice following guidelinesInjury characteristics recorded in the medical report as the type of injury (ACL only, ACL and meniscus, ACL with other ligament injury, recurrent ACL injury) the time before surgery, the type of rehabilitation before and after surgery
Surgery characteristicsTime Frame: ACL group: Two evaluations on both injured and healthy knees: (1) 4 months after surgery and (2) 8 months after surgery; Routine practice following guidelinesSurgery characteristics recorded in the medical report as the type of surgery, the surgery duration and tourniquet time

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026