Skip to content

Predicting Response to PD-1 Checkpoint Blockade Using Deep Learning Analysis of Imaging and Clinical Data

Predicting Response to PD-1 Checkpoint Blockade Using Deep Learning Analysis of Imaging and Clinical Data

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05711914
Acronym
Onc AI
Enrollment
300
Registered
2023-02-03
Start date
2021-01-31
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Brief summary

Immunotherapy has transformed cancer treatment with the PD-1 class of checkpoint inhibitors - pembrolizumab and nivolumab -- demonstrating durable responses in Stage IV metastatic tumors such as non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma. Despite these numerous successes, PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade therapies do have a number of shortcomings. Many approaches to predict response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint therapy have been investigated with limited success. Recent efforts exploring the utility of quantitative imaging biomarkers to predict response to PD-\[L\]1 immunotherapy have shown promise. The purpose of this retrospective multicenter study is to develop a multi-omic classifier to predict response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade for mutation negative (EGFR, ALK and ROS1) NSCLC

Detailed description

Recent Phase III studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of atezolizumab (PD-L1) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer \[3\] and small cell lung cancer, while the standard of care for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer has changed with positive results of the PACIFIC Phase III study, where durvalumab (PD-L1) administered after chemoradiation showed a significant increase in overall survival. Low response rates, generally in the 15% to 20% range in most diseases when used as a single agent, high therapy cost globally ($150,000 or more per year in the U.S) and serious immune-mediated adverse events, particularly when PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are combined with the CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab). Unpredictable and low patient response rates coupled with high drugs costs and serious toxicities can significantly burden healthcare systems, third-party payers and patients. Clearly, diagnostic tools to stratify patients according to response likelihood are necessary as PD-\[L\]1 checkpoint inhibitors continue to gain adoption. The standard-of-care biomarker is an immunohistochemistry (IHC) test that measures levels of the PD-L1 protein expressed in tumor samples. Tumor mutational burden, presence of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and inflammatory cytokines are being explored in multiple clinical trials involving PD-(L)1 often in combination with additional immuno-oncology (IO) therapies In such an approach, a non-invasive imaging scan can provide insight and information on the patient's entire tumor burden rather than a sample of a subset of lesions (as provided by biopsy or serum-based assays). When diagnostic images that depict all treatable lesions are further analyzed with computational techniques such as machine-learning and artificial intelligence, resulting in the identification of relevant imaging biomarkers, an accurate overall assessment of patient response to PD-\[L\]1 therapy may be attainable.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

MEDEXPRIM
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
GRATICULE
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients between 18 and 100 years of age -

Exclusion criteria

Patient under 18 years of age \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
developing a multi-omic classifier for predicting PD-1 responseduring one monthOnce sufficient patient data are accumulated, imaging data (both baseline and follow-up scans) will be annotated (segmented) to delineate lesions, lymph nodes, surrounding organs, etc…

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026