Skip to content

Performance Comparison of the 25 Gauge 20,000cpm HYPERVIT Dual Blade vs. 10,000cpm ULTRAVIT Vitrectomy Cutter

Performance Comparison of the 25 Gauge 20,000cpm HYPERVIT Dual Blade vs. 10,000cpm ULTRAVIT Vitrectomy Cutter

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05710458
Enrollment
72
Registered
2023-02-02
Start date
2021-07-01
Completion date
2022-11-30
Last updated
2023-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epiretinal Membrane, Macular Hole, Retinal Detachment, Vitrectomy, Vitreous Hemorrhage

Brief summary

This prospective randomised controlled trial will be conducted to investigate that increasing the vitrectomy cutting rate from 10,000 cut/min to 20,000 cut/min will result more efficiency and shorter core vitrectomy time, and it is equally safe as compared to the current 10,000 cut/min. We plan to target the patients undergoing for vitrectomy for common vitreoretinal pathology. Our plan is to conduct a randomised study with 2 arms, one with the higher cutting rate (20,000 cut/min) versus a second arm using the existing system 10,000 cuts/min.

Detailed description

In addition, we will measure the core vitrectomy duration by Constellation Vision System stopwatch. We will count the duration when the vitrectomy probe enter into the eye to the moment the performing the air/fluid exchange by shaving the peripheral vitreous to complete the vitrectomy. For our second outcome measure to prove the no-inferiority of intraoperative and postoperative complications patients will have 3 months follow up visits.

Interventions

DEVICE25 gauge 20,000 cpm Hypervit Dual Blade

Vitrectomy blade with increased cutting rate to 20,000 cut/min

DEVICE25 gauge 10,000 cpm Ultravit Vitrectomy Cutter

Existing Vitrectomy blade with cutting rate 10,000 cut/min

Sponsors

The University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Patients are randomised and masked from the treatment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient over 18 years of age who are undergoing vitrectomy for the following conditions: * Macular hole * Epimacular membrane * Vitreous hemorrhage * Primary retinal detachment

Exclusion criteria

* Patient who is * unable to give proper consent * previous vitrectomy or scleral buckle surgery * cases requiring silicone oil tamponed * undergoing repeated retinal detachment surgery * undergoing surgery for tractional diabetic retinopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Core vitrectomyintraoperative (From the moment probe enter into the eye till performing the air/fluid exchange to complete the vitrectomy)Measurement of core vitrectomy duration by Constellation Vision System

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-inferiority of intraoperative and postoperative complication3 monthsSafety and Efficacy

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026