Skip to content

Caudal vs. Pudendal Block in Peds GU

Caudal vs. Pudendal Block for Early Postoperative Pain Control in a Pediatric Population Undergoing Lower Genitourinary Surgery

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05708989
Enrollment
0
Registered
2023-02-01
Start date
2023-03-06
Completion date
2025-05-31
Last updated
2024-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chordee, Hypospadias, Penile Torsion, Phimosis

Keywords

caudal block, pudendal block, regional anesthesia

Brief summary

This study will compare two techniques to minimize pain during and after penile surgery in children undergoing certain urologic surgeries. These two approaches include the caudal nerve block and the pudendal nerve block.

Interventions

PROCEDURECaudal Block

Injectable 1 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine with 1mcg/kg dexmedetomidine into caudal spinal space. First attempt will be landmark-guided into the caudal spine region. Subsequent attempt(s) may be done using ultrasound.

PROCEDUREUltrasound-guided Pudendal Block

Injection of 0.5 ml/kg per side of injectable 0.2-0.3% ropivacaine with 0.5 mcg/kg dexmetomedine. Ultrasound-guided injection into each pudendal nerve region through skin of buttocks.

DRUGInjectable 1 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine with 1mcg/kg dexmedetomidine

Injectable 1 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine with 1mcg/kg dexmedetomidine into caudal spinal space. First attempt will be landmark-guided into the caudal spine region. Subsequent attempt(s) may be done using ultrasound.

DRUGInjection of 0.5 ml/kg per side of injectable 0.2-0.3% ropivacaine with 0.5 mcg/kg dexmetomedine.

Injection of 0.5 ml/kg per side of injectable 0.2-0.3% ropivacaine with 0.5 mcg/kg dexmetomedine. Ultrasound-guided injection into each pudendal nerve region through skin of buttocks.

Sponsors

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
6 Months to 3 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Undergoing penile genitourinary surgery * ASA class 1-3

Exclusion criteria

* Female patients * Male children \<6 months or \>/= 3 years of age * ASA class \>3 * Surgery at satellite location (non-Prentiss) * Concurrent non-lower GU tract surgery * Sacrospinal abnormality * History of chronic pain requiring opioid analgesics * Inability to tolerate and receive acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), alpha-2 agonists, or local anesthetics * History of malignant hyperthermia * History of coagulopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rescue Narcotic AdministrationDuring post-operative in-hospital recovery, approximately 1 hourDose (mg) of postoperative rescue opioid

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-Narcotic Rescue Administration at 24 hoursDuring first day after surgery, approximately 24 hoursDose (mg) of non-narcotic rescue medication
Non-Narcotic Rescue Administration at 48 hoursDuring second day after surgery, approximately 48 hoursDose (mg) of non-narcotic rescue medication
Non-Narcotic Rescue Administration at 72 hoursDuring third day after surgery, approximately 72 hoursDose (mg) of non-narcotic rescue medication
Number of participants with at least one adverse event (AE) as measured by patient reportEnd of study, up to 3 monthsAdverse events will include any AE related to study procedure

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026