Skip to content

Cross Fiber Fascial Manipulation and Stretching Techniques in Overhead Throwing Athletes

Comparative Effects of Cross Fiber Fascial Manipulation and Stretching Techniques on Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit in Overhead Throwing Athletes

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05707026
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-01-31
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2023-02-01
Last updated
2023-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overhead Throwing Athletes, Tennis Players, Bowlers, Volleyball Players

Brief summary

Athletic training and sports participation is to enhance athletic performance. Performance is however multifactorial i.e., depending upon several parameters including warm-up practice, training regimes and other interventions. Stretching techniques that focus on increasing posterior shoulder soft tissue flexibility are commonly incorporated into prevention and treatment programs for the overhead athletes. GIRD is usually managed by stretching and soft tissue release of posterior shoulder capsule. Fascial manipulation is a manual therapy technique used in the management of musculoskeletal disorders. This study aims to evaluate the comparative effects of cross fiber fascial manipulation with stretching techniques in overhead throwing athletes

Detailed description

This was a randomized clinical trial that was conducted at Pakistan sports board and Coaching center, Lahore. Non probability convenient sampling technique was used to collect the data as per inclusion criteria. 40 Participants of this study were randomly allocated into 2 Groups. 20 participants in each group. The group A received three sessions of fascial manipulation for two weeks. Group B received three sessions of sleeper stretch in a side lying position in 90o abduction, elbow at 90o flexion and then performed shoulder IR and cross-body adduction stretch in sitting position. Three sets of the each stretch positions were held for 30 seconds with a 1 minute break between sets. A universal goniometer was used to measure internal rotation, external rotation, horizontal abduction, ROWE score to assess function, pain, stability and motion, Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) was used to assess pain. The data was analyzed via SPSS version 22.

Interventions

OTHERcross fiber fascial manipulation

The group A received three sessions of fascial manipulation in two weeks. FM applied for 5 to 8 minutes at each point.

OTHERstretching techniques(sleeper stretch and cross body adduction stretch)

Group B received three sessions of sleeper and cross body adduction stretches. Group B received three sessions of sleeper stretch in a side lying position in 90o abduction, elbow at 90o flexion and then performing shoulder IR and cross-body adduction stretch was done in sitting position. Three sets of the each stretch position were held for 30 seconds with a 1 minute break between sets.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Active male and female athletes were included. * Age group was (18-40) . * Overhead throwing athletes(tennis, volleyball, bowlers) were included in this study) * Screening tests were taken to identify subjects with GIRD. GIRD was defined as more than 20o decrease in IR at 90o abduction in the dominant side compared to non-dominant side . * Subjects who rated shoulder pain 5 or more in NPRS/symptomatic with GIRD were recruited

Exclusion criteria

: * Any deformity * Any radiculopathy * Shoulder traumatic injuries( dislocation, subluxation, fracture) * Systemic illness * Subacromial impingement signs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Goniometer2 weeksA universal goniometer was used to assess internal rotation, external rotation and horizontal adduction
numeric pain rating scale2 weeksNPRS for pain assessment in overhead athletes reporting pain with GIRD, it is a subjective measure in which individual rate their pain on an 11-point numerical scale. The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10( worst pain
ROWE score composite2 weeksROWE score for shoulder functional assessment(50), stability(30), pain(10) and motion(10). Total score is 100 thus 90-100=excellent ,70-89=good , 40-69=fair , less than 40 points=poor

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactAqsa Nawaz, MS
aqsanawaz809@gmail.com03083907800

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026