Skip to content

Comparison of Two Graft Choices in Mediale Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction (MPFL)

Comparison of Two Graft Choices in Mediale Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction (MPFL) - A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05706363
Enrollment
90
Registered
2023-01-31
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2026-07-30
Last updated
2025-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patellar Dislocation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to elucidate surgical techniques for reconstructing MPFL in the treatment of chronic patella instability. The two techniques are conventional technique with the gracillis and screw fixation in the femur which is compared with new technique where the QT tendons and anchor fixation in the femur are used. It would be investigated which technique provides the best stability with the least postoperative pain from the reconstruction and the lowest frequency of patellar reluxation.

Interventions

Using quadriceps graft as new medial patellofemoral ligament graft. Fixated with suture anchor

Sponsors

Aarhus University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

1. Standard: Gracillis graft 2. Intervention: Quadriceps graft

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between 15 and 40 years of age with chronic tendency to lateral patellar dislocation (defined as 2 or more verified dislocation cases) * The growth zones must be found closed - verified by MRI scan

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with known rheumatoid arthritis. * Patients with arthroscopically detected osteoarthritis (grade 3 cartilage lesion) * Inability to follow a normal rehabilitation regime. * Previous ligament surgery in injured knees.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kujala (Anterior Knee Pain Scale)24 monthPatient reported outcome score, 0=worst and 100=best

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)24 monthPatient reported outcome score, 0=worst and 100=best
Lysholm-Tegner (Activity Score)24 monthPatient reported outcome score, 0=worst and 100=best
Donor site morbidity score, 0=worst and 100=best24 monthPatient reported outcome score
Knee pain24 monthPalpatory pain in relation to graft fixation in femur on a four-point likert scale (no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain)
Patella Re-luxation sensation24 monthQuestion about how often the patella has dislocated after the surgery. (no dislocation, 1-2 dislocation/md, more dislocation).
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-pain score)24 monthPatient reported outcome score, 0=Best and 10=worst

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026