Skip to content

Evaluation of the Course and Effectiveness of Conservative Therapy in Patients With Achilles Tendinopathy

Evaluation of the Course and Effectiveness of Conservative Therapy in Patients With Achilles Tendinopathy Using Ultrasonography

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05702918
Enrollment
47
Registered
2023-01-27
Start date
2022-01-24
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2026-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Achilles Tendinopathy

Keywords

Achilles Tendinopathy, Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, Ultrasonography

Brief summary

This work is designed as a randomized clinical trial, in which the effects of a protocol of 12-week resistance training loading the Achilles tendon and low-energy focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in patients with Achilles tendinopathy (AT) will be monitored. It is estimated that at least 40 patients will participate, randomly divided into two groups. Group A will be instructed to perform a training protocol in combination with ESWT according to selected parameters. Group B only completes the same training protocol.

Detailed description

This work is designed as a randomized clinical trial, in which the effects of a protocol of 12-week resistance training loading the Achilles tendon and low-energy focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in patients with Achilles tendinopathy (AT) will be monitored. It is estimated that at least 40 patients will participate, randomly divided into two groups. Group A will be instructed to perform a training protocol in combination with ESWT according to selected parameters. Group B only completes the same training protocol. The research within one patient will last a total of 26 weeks from the initial to the final examination and will include several control measurements: at 6, 12, and 26 week from the beginning of therapy. Potential participants will be selected based on the recommendation of a specialist doctor and their suitability will be assessed according to the inclusion criteria. They will then be invited to an initial examination. This will include an objective examination by a physiotherapist, a subjective assessment by the patient and an ultrasonographic (USG) examination followed by a micromorphological analysis using special software. At the end of the initial examination, the participant will be randomly assigned to group A or B. The study program for a specific participant will depend on the assigned group.

Interventions

The energy will be set to 0.10-0.14 mJ/mm2, frequency 5 Hz, total number of shocks 2000. The application will be semi-static at the location of the largest USG finding. Shocks are applied from all three sides (medial, lateral, dorsal).

It is a 12-week Silbernagel ankle dorsiflexion resistance training protocol. It is a series of exercises with a gradual progression of load according to defined criteria, which the patient practices every day.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Motol
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be divided into two groups. Group A will follow resistance training protocol and receive ESWT. Group B will follow resistance training only.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* the patient shows symptoms of Achilles tendinopathy (pain, swelling and dysfunction in the area of Achilles tendon), which at least partially limit his quality of life during normal or sporting activities, * the patient is in the age group of 18-60 years, * the patient has difficulties in only one lower limb; the second, asymptomatic limb will be considered the reference, * the patient is not aware of any mechanical damage to the tendon in symptomatic limb in the past (e.g. partial or complete rupture as a result of an injury), * the patient has not undergone any treatment aimed at AS in the last 3 months (surgery, corticoid application, plasma therapy, shock waves, physiotherapy, etc.), objective US examination of AS shows structural changes (expansion, neovascularization, focal hypoechoic areas, etc.).

Exclusion criteria

* patient has been diagnosed with a rheumatic disease or a disease of the central nervous system * patient has any condition which is contraindication for ESWT application * patient is aware of mechanical damage to the Achilles tendon as a result of an injury in the past.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peak Spatial Frequency Radius at the Site of PathologyValues at baseline and week 26.Peak Spatial Frequency Radius (PSFR) was assessed using spatial frequency analysis (SFA) software applied to standardized B-mode ultrasound images of the Achilles tendon. Ultrasound images were acquired in a long-axis using predefined machine settings. The image was saved and exported for subsequent analysis. In the SFA software, the region corresponding to the site of maximal tendon pathology was selected, and PSFR values (mm-¹) were calculated. PSFR values were recorded at baseline and at the 26-week follow-up.
VISA-A Questionnaire ScoreValues at baseline and week 26.The VISA-A questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for Achilles tendinopathy. Scores range from 0 to 100 (score on scale), with higher scores indicating better function and fewer symptoms. Scores were recorded at baseline and at the 26-week follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tendon Diameter at the Place of Maximum Tendon WidthValues at baseline and week 26.Achilles tendon diameter was measured using standardized B-mode ultrasound imaging at the site of maximal tendon width. Measurements were performed using built-in ultrasound system measurement tools. Measurements were recorded at baseline and at the 26-week follow-up.
Pain Intensity Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)Values at baseline and week 26Pain intensity was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores were recorded at baseline and at the 26-week follow-up.

Countries

Czechia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A - ESWT + Exercise
Participants in group A will complete a 12-week ankle dorsiflexion resistance training protocol according to Silbernagel. It is a series of heel rise exercises with a gradual progression of load according to defined criteria, which the patient practices every day. In addition, participants will receive a low-energy focused ESWT. In total, it will be applied 4 times with an interval of 7 days from the BTL-6000 FSWT device with piezoelectric generator. The energy will be set to 0.10-0.14 mJ/mm2, frequency 6 Hz, total number of shocks 1800. The application will be semi-static at the location of the largest USG finding. 600 shocks are applied from all three sides (medial, lateral, dorsal). The set values will not change throughout the research. These parameters were selected in accordance to ISMST guidelines.
21
Group B - Exercise
Participants in group B will complete a 12-week ankle dorsiflexion resistance training protocol according to Silbernagel. It is a series of heel rise exercises with a gradual progression of load according to defined criteria, which the patient practices every day.
20
Total41

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up02
Overall StudyUnrelated injury20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup A - ESWT + ExerciseGroup B - ExerciseTotal
Age, Continuous33.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
32.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Body Mass Index24.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
26.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
24.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants11 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 210 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 210 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 210 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Peak Spatial Frequency Radius at the Site of Pathology

Peak Spatial Frequency Radius (PSFR) was assessed using spatial frequency analysis (SFA) software applied to standardized B-mode ultrasound images of the Achilles tendon. Ultrasound images were acquired in a long-axis using predefined machine settings. The image was saved and exported for subsequent analysis. In the SFA software, the region corresponding to the site of maximal tendon pathology was selected, and PSFR values (mm-¹) were calculated. PSFR values were recorded at baseline and at the 26-week follow-up.

Time frame: Values at baseline and week 26.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A - ESWT + ExercisePeak Spatial Frequency Radius at the Site of PathologyBaseline2.180 mm^-1Standard Deviation 0.093
Group A - ESWT + ExercisePeak Spatial Frequency Radius at the Site of PathologyWeek 262.194 mm^-1Standard Deviation 0.115
Group B - ExercisePeak Spatial Frequency Radius at the Site of PathologyBaseline2.146 mm^-1Standard Deviation 0.067
Group B - ExercisePeak Spatial Frequency Radius at the Site of PathologyWeek 262.184 mm^-1Standard Deviation 0.094
Primary

VISA-A Questionnaire Score

The VISA-A questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for Achilles tendinopathy. Scores range from 0 to 100 (score on scale), with higher scores indicating better function and fewer symptoms. Scores were recorded at baseline and at the 26-week follow-up.

Time frame: Values at baseline and week 26.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A - ESWT + ExerciseVISA-A Questionnaire ScoreBaseline66.9 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
Group A - ESWT + ExerciseVISA-A Questionnaire ScoreWeek 2692.7 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Group B - ExerciseVISA-A Questionnaire ScoreBaseline62.9 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 12.8
Group B - ExerciseVISA-A Questionnaire ScoreWeek 2686 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Secondary

Pain Intensity Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

Pain intensity was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores were recorded at baseline and at the 26-week follow-up.

Time frame: Values at baseline and week 26

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A - ESWT + ExercisePain Intensity Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)Baseline6.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Group A - ESWT + ExercisePain Intensity Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)Week 261.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Group B - ExercisePain Intensity Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)Baseline5.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Group B - ExercisePain Intensity Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)Week 261.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Tendon Diameter at the Place of Maximum Tendon Width

Achilles tendon diameter was measured using standardized B-mode ultrasound imaging at the site of maximal tendon width. Measurements were performed using built-in ultrasound system measurement tools. Measurements were recorded at baseline and at the 26-week follow-up.

Time frame: Values at baseline and week 26.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A - ESWT + ExerciseTendon Diameter at the Place of Maximum Tendon WidthBaseline6.0 mmStandard Deviation 2
Group A - ESWT + ExerciseTendon Diameter at the Place of Maximum Tendon WidthWeek 265.9 mmStandard Deviation 1.9
Group B - ExerciseTendon Diameter at the Place of Maximum Tendon WidthBaseline6.6 mmStandard Deviation 2.2
Group B - ExerciseTendon Diameter at the Place of Maximum Tendon WidthWeek 266.4 mmStandard Deviation 1.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026