Chronic Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Chronic Pain, Physical Function, Mindfulness
Brief summary
The investigators aim to conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility of a mind-body walking program compared to a health education program for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The investigators will assess the feasibility of recruitment procedures (enrollment, recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities) and intervention delivery (fidelity, adherence, credibility, satisfaction, optimization), following pre-specified benchmarks. Both programs will be delivered in-person.
Detailed description
The investigators aim to conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility of a mind-body walking program (GetActive-Fitbit) compared to a health education program (Healthy Living for Pain) for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The investigators will assess the feasibility of recruitment procedures (enrollment, recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities) and intervention delivery (fidelity, adherence, credibility, satisfaction, optimization), following pre-specified benchmarks. Both programs will be delivered in-person. Each program will consist of ten 60-minute sessions in-person. Participants will receive a treatment manual and ActiGraph watch to assess physical function. There are 3 assessment points consisting of self-report surveys and performance-based measures: baseline, post-program, and 6-month follow-up. All participants will receive access to the other program's manual and website after completing the six-month follow-up.
Interventions
GetActive-Fitbit is an adaptation of the original GetActive-Fitbit program, a mind-body program for the unique needs of individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain that incorporates activity skills to help individuals improve all aspects of physical function. The GetActive-Fitbit sessions address mind-body skills (e.g., mindfulness, deep breathing, self-compassion), walking skills (e.g., step goals, quota-based pacing), and skills to change thinking (e.g., identify unhelpful thoughts about pain and activity, challenging thoughts). The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice of skills and walking.
Healthy Living for Pain is an active intervention that will be dose, attention, and time matches to the GetActive-Fitbit program. Healthy Living for Pain is an adaptation of the Health Enhancement Program, developed by Dr. Vranceanu and colleagues from Stony Brook, with adjustments for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The Healthy Living for Pain sessions provide educational information on chronic musculoskeletal pain, the role of sleep and nutrition, physical activity, healthcare management, medication use, and social connection. The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice journaling.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Male and female outpatients, age 18 years or older 2. Fluent in English 3. Have nonmalignant chronic musculoskeletal pain for more than 3 months 4. Able to perform a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) 5. Owns a smartphone with Bluetooth 4.0 or computer 6. Willingness and ability to participate in one of the 2 programs and to comply with the requirements of the study protocol. 7. Free of concurrent psychotropic medication for at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of treatment, OR stable on current medication for a minimum of 6 weeks and willing to maintain a stable dose 8. Low-level of activity (must meet 2/3 criteria; if difficult to assess, recruiter may ask participant to report their recent step data from their smartphone to better understand their activity level) 1. Sitting for more than 8 hours/day per self-report 2. Exercising for fewer than 3 days/week (30+min of exercise constitutes an "exercise day") per self-report 3. Walking for fewer than 7 days/week (30+min of walking constitutes a "walking day") per self-report
Exclusion criteria
1. Diagnosed with a medical illness expected to worsen in the next 6 months (e.g., malignancy) 2. Serious mental illness or instability for which hospitalization may be likely in the next 6 months 3. Current active suicidal ideation reported on self-report 4. Untreated and/or unstable schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or other psychotic disorder 5. Current, active substance abuse or dependence, and current alcohol dependence within the past 6 months 6. Practice of yoga, meditation, guided imagery or other mind body techniques that elicit the RR, once per week for \>45 min 3 times/week within the last 3 months or less. 7. Regular use of Fitbit DMD in the last 3 months 8. Unable to walk/in a wheelchair 9. Mild cognitive decline for participants 65+ only (Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire; PMSQ 4 or more errors).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment Feasibility (Ability) | 1 Year | Ability to enroll 80% or more of the sedentary chronic pain patients who meet study criteria. |
| Recruitment Feasibility (Timeliness) - Number of Participants Recruited in 1 Year | 1 Year | Timeliness of enrollment; we will recruit a sample of 90 patients across the 3 sites over the course of 1 year. Participants will be considered enrolled upon randomization. Assessed by the number of participants enrolled in the study over the course of 1 year. If number enrolled meets or exceeds goal of 90 participants, the benchmark is considered met. |
| Feasibility of Recruitment Racial and Ethnic Minorities | 1 Year | 38% or more of the entire sample will be comprised of racial and ethnic minorities, which is consistent with the current USA demographic distribution. |
| Intervention Feasibility/ Adherence to Sessions | Post-Test (10 Weeks) | ≥80 chronic pain patients attend ≥7/10 sessions for each program (70%) |
| Credibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibility | Baseline (0 Weeks) | ≥80 chronic pain patients with credibility scores higher than the Credibility and Expectancy Scale credibility subscale's mid-point, indicating intervention credibility. Credibility subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate higher perceived credibility for the program. |
| Client Satisfaction Scale | Post-Test (10 Weeks) | ≥80 chronic pain patients with satisfaction scores higher than the scale's mid-point, indicating intervention satisfaction. |
| Retention | Post-test (10 weeks), Follow-up (24 weeks) | ≥80 post-treatment, ≥75% 6 months follow up for self-report, performance based and Actigraph data (this includes valid data for all participants). |
| Assessment Feasibility | 1 Year | We calculated the proportion of assessment procedures that were administered as intended in the the checklists of the study protocol. The number of assessment procedures that were administered in line with the study's protocol checklists was divided by the total number of assessment procedures. The benchmark was set to 90%, i.e., assessment procedures were deemed feasible if ≥90% of assessment procedures were delivered as specified in the protocol. |
| Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancy | Baseline (0 weeks) | ≥80 chronic pain patients with expectancy scores higher than the subscale's mid-point, indicating intervention expectancy. Expectancy subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate more belief that treatment will help. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) Scale | Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks) | Rate of a participant's pain intensity and related interference in enjoyment of life and general activity, using a 0-10 Likert scale. Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores indicating greater pain and interference. |
| WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) | Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks) | The WHODAS measures level of functioning in six domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation. Each question on the scale is measured 0-4. The score range is 0-100, with higher scores indicating more disability. |
| 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks) | The 6MWT is a performance-based measure that assesses physical function and endurance. |
| ActiGraph GT9X | Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks) | The ActiGraph GT9X is a step count device that objectively measures function (number of steps). |
| PROMIS Depression v1.08b | Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks) | The PROMIS depression v1.08b measures negative mood, views of self and cognitions on a 5-point scale. Raw scores are converted into a t-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. |
| PROMIS Anxiety v1.08a | Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks) | The PROMIS anxiety v1.08a measures fear, worry, hyperarousal and somatic symptoms. Each item is rated on a 1-5 point Likert Scale and raw scores are converted to t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicating more anxiety symptoms. |
| Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks) | A 13-item questionnaire assessing one's tendency to focus on pain-related thoughts and feel helpless and hopeless due to pain on a scale of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate higher pain catastrophizing. Scores range from 0 to 52. |
| Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK) | Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks) | A 17-item questionnaire that assesses fear avoidance and fear of activity. Higher scores indicate higher kinesiophobia. Scores range from 17 to 68. |
| Measure of Current Status (MOCS) | Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks) | The MOCS questionnaire assesses ability to engage in a series of healthy coping skills (e.g., relaxation, social support, adaptive thinking). Higher scores indicate a stronger ability to recognize stress and cope, with scores ranging from 10 to 50. |
| Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS) | Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks) | Rate of a participant's broad conceptualization of mindfulness, items range from 1-4. Higher values reflect higher levels of mindfulness. Scores range from 12 to 48. |
| Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC) | Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks) | 3-items assessing the extent to which patients perceive the intervention improved functioning and symptoms. Each item is rated on a 1-7 point scale with higher scores indicated greater perceived improvement. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Massachusetts General Hospital
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| GetActive-Fitbit GetActive-Fitbit is an adaptation of the original GetActive-Fitbit program, a mind-body program for the unique needs of individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain that incorporates activity skills to help individuals improve all aspects of physical function. The GetActive-Fitbit sessions address mind-body skills (e.g., mindfulness, deep breathing, self-compassion), walking skills (e.g., step goals, quota-based pacing), and skills to change thinking (e.g., identify unhelpful thoughts about pain and activity, challenging thoughts). The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice of skills and walking.
GetActive-Fitbit: GetActive-Fitbit is an adaptation of the original GetActive-Fitbit program, a mind-body program for the unique needs of individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain that incorporates activity skills to help individuals improve all aspects of physical function. The GetActive-Fitbit sessions address mind-body skills (e.g., mindfulness, deep breathing, self-compassion), walking skills (e.g., step goals, quota-based pacing), and skills to change thinking (e.g., identify unhelpful thoughts about pain and activity, challenging thoughts). The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice of skills and walking. | 47 |
| Healthy Living for Pain Healthy Living for Pain is an active intervention that will be dose, attention, and time matches to the GetActive-Fitbit program. Healthy Living for Pain is an adaptation of the Health Enhancement Program, developed by Dr. Vranceanu and colleagues from Stony Brook, with adjustments for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The Healthy Living for Pain sessions provide educational information on chronic musculoskeletal pain, the role of sleep and nutrition, physical activity, healthcare management, medication use, and social connection. The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice journaling.
Healthy Living for Pain: Healthy Living for Pain is an active intervention that will be dose, attention, and time matches to the GetActive-Fitbit program. Healthy Living for Pain is an adaptation of the Health Enhancement Program, developed by Dr. Vranceanu and colleagues from Stony Brook, with adjustments for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The Healthy Living for Pain sessions provide educational information on chronic musculoskeletal pain, the role of sleep and nutrition, physical activity, healthcare management, medication use, and social connection. The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice journaling. | 45 |
| Total | 92 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | GetActive-Fitbit | Total | Healthy Living for Pain |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 55.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 | 57.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 | 60.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8 |
| Education Choose Not to Answer | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Education Completed 4 years of college | 15 Participants | 25 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Education Completed high school or GED | 12 Participants | 18 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Education Graduate/professional degree | 6 Participants | 15 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Education Less than high school | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Education Some college/Associates degree | 11 Participants | 28 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Employment Choose Not to Answer | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Employment Employed full-time | 9 Participants | 21 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Employment Employed part-time | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Employment Keeping House/Housemaker | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Employment Other | 4 Participants | 9 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Employment Retired | 14 Participants | 30 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Employment Unemployed | 8 Participants | 13 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 39 Participants | 77 Participants | 38 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 5 Participants | 10 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Income $10,000 to less than $15,000 | 5 Participants | 10 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Income $15,000 to less than $20,000 | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Income $20,000 to less than $25,000 | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Income $25,000 to less than $35,000 | 3 Participants | 8 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Income $35,000 to less than $50,000 | 9 Participants | 12 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Income $50,000 to less than $75,000 | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Income $75,000 or more | 9 Participants | 20 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Income Choose Not to Answer | 7 Participants | 18 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Income Less than $10,000 | 6 Participants | 9 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Marital Status Choose Not to Answer | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Marital Status Living with significant other | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Marital Status Married | 16 Participants | 30 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Marital Status Separated/Divorced | 9 Participants | 16 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Marital Status Single, never married | 16 Participants | 29 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Marital Status Widowed | 2 Participants | 9 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 21 Participants | 41 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 5 Participants | 8 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 17 Participants | 37 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 47 participants | 92 participants | 45 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 37 Participants | 69 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 23 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Gender identity not listed | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Man | 10 Participants | 23 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Prefer not to say | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Woman | 36 Participants | 68 Participants | 32 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 47 | 0 / 45 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 11 / 47 | 16 / 45 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 47 | 1 / 45 |
Outcome results
Assessment Feasibility
We calculated the proportion of assessment procedures that were administered as intended in the the checklists of the study protocol. The number of assessment procedures that were administered in line with the study's protocol checklists was divided by the total number of assessment procedures. The benchmark was set to 90%, i.e., assessment procedures were deemed feasible if ≥90% of assessment procedures were delivered as specified in the protocol.
Time frame: 1 Year
Population: There are no arms/groups for this outcome because the benchmark was calculated based on percentage accuracy of assessment study procedures as conducted by staff not participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Assessment Feasibility | 3241 Number of assessment procedures |
Client Satisfaction Scale
≥80 chronic pain patients with satisfaction scores higher than the scale's mid-point, indicating intervention satisfaction.
Time frame: Post-Test (10 Weeks)
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Client Satisfaction Scale | scored above the scale midpoint | 41 Participants |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Client Satisfaction Scale | scored below the scale midpoint | 1 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Client Satisfaction Scale | scored above the scale midpoint | 30 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Client Satisfaction Scale | scored below the scale midpoint | 10 Participants |
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancy
≥80 chronic pain patients with expectancy scores higher than the subscale's mid-point, indicating intervention expectancy. Expectancy subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate more belief that treatment will help.
Time frame: Baseline (0 weeks)
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancy | scored above the scale midpoint | 36 Participants |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancy | scored below the scale midpoint | 6 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancy | scored above the scale midpoint | 26 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancy | scored below the scale midpoint | 13 Participants |
Credibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibility
≥80 chronic pain patients with credibility scores higher than the Credibility and Expectancy Scale credibility subscale's mid-point, indicating intervention credibility. Credibility subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate higher perceived credibility for the program.
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks)
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Credibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibility | scored below the scale midpoint | 0 Participants |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Credibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibility | scored above the scale midpoint | 41 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Credibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibility | scored below the scale midpoint | 5 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Credibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibility | scored above the scale midpoint | 34 Participants |
Feasibility of Recruitment Racial and Ethnic Minorities
38% or more of the entire sample will be comprised of racial and ethnic minorities, which is consistent with the current USA demographic distribution.
Time frame: 1 Year
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Feasibility of Recruitment Racial and Ethnic Minorities | 50 Participants |
Intervention Feasibility/ Adherence to Sessions
≥80 chronic pain patients attend ≥7/10 sessions for each program (70%)
Time frame: Post-Test (10 Weeks)
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Intervention Feasibility/ Adherence to Sessions | Attended ≥7 out of 10 group or make-up sessions | 44 Participants |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Intervention Feasibility/ Adherence to Sessions | Attended <7 out of 10 group or make-up sessions | 2 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Intervention Feasibility/ Adherence to Sessions | Attended ≥7 out of 10 group or make-up sessions | 37 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Intervention Feasibility/ Adherence to Sessions | Attended <7 out of 10 group or make-up sessions | 8 Participants |
Recruitment Feasibility (Ability)
Ability to enroll 80% or more of the sedentary chronic pain patients who meet study criteria.
Time frame: 1 Year
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Recruitment Feasibility (Ability) | 92 Participants |
Recruitment Feasibility (Timeliness) - Number of Participants Recruited in 1 Year
Timeliness of enrollment; we will recruit a sample of 90 patients across the 3 sites over the course of 1 year. Participants will be considered enrolled upon randomization. Assessed by the number of participants enrolled in the study over the course of 1 year. If number enrolled meets or exceeds goal of 90 participants, the benchmark is considered met.
Time frame: 1 Year
Population: Arms are combined because benchmark is calculated prior to participant randomization to treatment group
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Recruitment Feasibility (Timeliness) - Number of Participants Recruited in 1 Year | 92 Participants |
Retention
≥80 post-treatment, ≥75% 6 months follow up for self-report, performance based and Actigraph data (this includes valid data for all participants).
Time frame: Post-test (10 weeks), Follow-up (24 weeks)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Retention | Post-Test | Completed self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data | 44 Participants |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Retention | Post-Test | Did not complete self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data | 3 Participants |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Retention | Follow-Up | Completed self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data | 41 Participants |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Retention | Follow-Up | Did not complete self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data | 6 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Retention | Follow-Up | Did not complete self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data | 8 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Retention | Post-Test | Completed self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data | 39 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Retention | Follow-Up | Completed self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data | 37 Participants |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Retention | Post-Test | Did not complete self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data | 6 Participants |
6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
The 6MWT is a performance-based measure that assesses physical function and endurance.
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)
Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up assessments was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Baseline | 289.62 meters | Standard Deviation 77.61 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Post-Test | 339.20 meters | Standard Deviation 80.32 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Follow-Up | 316.71 meters | Standard Deviation 77.22 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Baseline | 260.28 meters | Standard Deviation 76.26 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Post-Test | 307.37 meters | Standard Deviation 80.11 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Follow-Up | 299.74 meters | Standard Deviation 74.87 |
ActiGraph GT9X
The ActiGraph GT9X is a step count device that objectively measures function (number of steps).
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)
Population: The number of participants who received an ActiGraph at post-test and follow-up was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | ActiGraph GT9X | Baseline | 2641.43 Steps | Standard Deviation 1735.57 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | ActiGraph GT9X | Post-Test | 3694.77 Steps | Standard Deviation 2175.43 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | ActiGraph GT9X | Follow-Up | 3050.62 Steps | Standard Deviation 2023.89 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | ActiGraph GT9X | Baseline | 3177.11 Steps | Standard Deviation 2573.83 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | ActiGraph GT9X | Post-Test | 3032.90 Steps | Standard Deviation 2668.91 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | ActiGraph GT9X | Follow-Up | 3290.56 Steps | Standard Deviation 2496.78 |
Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)
Rate of a participant's broad conceptualization of mindfulness, items range from 1-4. Higher values reflect higher levels of mindfulness. Scores range from 12 to 48.
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)
Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS) | Follow-Up | 32.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.42 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS) | Baseline | 32.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.68 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS) | Post-Test | 34.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.97 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS) | Baseline | 34.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.98 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS) | Post-Test | 34.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.52 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS) | Follow-Up | 35.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.88 |
Measure of Current Status (MOCS)
The MOCS questionnaire assesses ability to engage in a series of healthy coping skills (e.g., relaxation, social support, adaptive thinking). Higher scores indicate a stronger ability to recognize stress and cope, with scores ranging from 10 to 50.
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)
Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Measure of Current Status (MOCS) | Baseline | 2.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Measure of Current Status (MOCS) | Post-Test | 2.50 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Measure of Current Status (MOCS) | Follow-Up | 2.51 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Measure of Current Status (MOCS) | Baseline | 2.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Measure of Current Status (MOCS) | Post-Test | 2.37 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Measure of Current Status (MOCS) | Follow-Up | 2.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC)
3-items assessing the extent to which patients perceive the intervention improved functioning and symptoms. Each item is rated on a 1-7 point scale with higher scores indicated greater perceived improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC) | Global Impressions of Change: Pain Management | 6.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC) | Global Impressions of Change: Physical Function | 5.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC) | Global Impressions of Change: Emotional Wellbeing | 6.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC) | Global Impressions of Change: Pain Management | 5.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC) | Global Impressions of Change: Physical Function | 5.15 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.29 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC) | Global Impressions of Change: Emotional Wellbeing | 5.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.32 |
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
A 13-item questionnaire assessing one's tendency to focus on pain-related thoughts and feel helpless and hopeless due to pain on a scale of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate higher pain catastrophizing. Scores range from 0 to 52.
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)
Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Baseline | 20.47 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Post-Test | 11.70 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.6 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Follow-Up | 12.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.86 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Baseline | 19.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.56 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Post-Test | 16.77 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.81 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Follow-Up | 16.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.63 |
Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) Scale
Rate of a participant's pain intensity and related interference in enjoyment of life and general activity, using a 0-10 Likert scale. Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores indicating greater pain and interference.
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)
Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) Scale | Baseline | 6.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.05 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) Scale | Post-Test | 5.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.41 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) Scale | Follow-Up | 4.61 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.04 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) Scale | Baseline | 6.72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.78 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) Scale | Post-Test | 5.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.26 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) Scale | Follow-Up | 5.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.52 |
PROMIS Anxiety v1.08a
The PROMIS anxiety v1.08a measures fear, worry, hyperarousal and somatic symptoms. Each item is rated on a 1-5 point Likert Scale and raw scores are converted to t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicating more anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)
Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | PROMIS Anxiety v1.08a | Baseline | 57.25 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.49 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | PROMIS Anxiety v1.08a | Post-Test | 55.04 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.84 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | PROMIS Anxiety v1.08a | Follow-Up | 53.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.92 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | PROMIS Anxiety v1.08a | Baseline | 56.24 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.14 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | PROMIS Anxiety v1.08a | Post-Test | 54.69 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.08 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | PROMIS Anxiety v1.08a | Follow-Up | 53.12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.97 |
PROMIS Depression v1.08b
The PROMIS depression v1.08b measures negative mood, views of self and cognitions on a 5-point scale. Raw scores are converted into a t-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)
Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | PROMIS Depression v1.08b | Baseline | 54.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.48 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | PROMIS Depression v1.08b | Post-Test | 52.81 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.53 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | PROMIS Depression v1.08b | Follow-Up | 52.59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.75 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | PROMIS Depression v1.08b | Baseline | 54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.54 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | PROMIS Depression v1.08b | Post-Test | 52.14 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.49 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | PROMIS Depression v1.08b | Follow-Up | 52.82 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK)
A 17-item questionnaire that assesses fear avoidance and fear of activity. Higher scores indicate higher kinesiophobia. Scores range from 17 to 68.
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)
Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK) | Baseline | 39.98 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.39 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK) | Post-Test | 34.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.86 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK) | Follow-Up | 34.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK) | Baseline | 40.37 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.84 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK) | Post-Test | 40.13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK) | Follow-Up | 39.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.52 |
WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)
The WHODAS measures level of functioning in six domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation. Each question on the scale is measured 0-4. The score range is 0-100, with higher scores indicating more disability.
Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)
Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) | Baseline | 48.79 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.35 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) | Post-Test | 35.21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.09 |
| All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain) | WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) | Follow-Up | 34.61 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.03 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) | Baseline | 44.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.04 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) | Post-Test | 39.24 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.02 |
| Healthy Living for Pain | WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) | Follow-Up | 36.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.57 |