Skip to content

The Thrive Study: Improving Multimodal Physical Function in Adults With Heterogenous Chronic Pain

The Thrive Study: Improving Multimodal Physical Function in Adults With Heterogenous Chronic Pain: Multi-site Feasibility RCT

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05700383
Enrollment
92
Registered
2023-01-26
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2024-10-01
Last updated
2026-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Keywords

Chronic Pain, Physical Function, Mindfulness

Brief summary

The investigators aim to conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility of a mind-body walking program compared to a health education program for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The investigators will assess the feasibility of recruitment procedures (enrollment, recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities) and intervention delivery (fidelity, adherence, credibility, satisfaction, optimization), following pre-specified benchmarks. Both programs will be delivered in-person.

Detailed description

The investigators aim to conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility of a mind-body walking program (GetActive-Fitbit) compared to a health education program (Healthy Living for Pain) for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The investigators will assess the feasibility of recruitment procedures (enrollment, recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities) and intervention delivery (fidelity, adherence, credibility, satisfaction, optimization), following pre-specified benchmarks. Both programs will be delivered in-person. Each program will consist of ten 60-minute sessions in-person. Participants will receive a treatment manual and ActiGraph watch to assess physical function. There are 3 assessment points consisting of self-report surveys and performance-based measures: baseline, post-program, and 6-month follow-up. All participants will receive access to the other program's manual and website after completing the six-month follow-up.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGetActive-Fitbit

GetActive-Fitbit is an adaptation of the original GetActive-Fitbit program, a mind-body program for the unique needs of individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain that incorporates activity skills to help individuals improve all aspects of physical function. The GetActive-Fitbit sessions address mind-body skills (e.g., mindfulness, deep breathing, self-compassion), walking skills (e.g., step goals, quota-based pacing), and skills to change thinking (e.g., identify unhelpful thoughts about pain and activity, challenging thoughts). The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice of skills and walking.

BEHAVIORALHealthy Living for Pain

Healthy Living for Pain is an active intervention that will be dose, attention, and time matches to the GetActive-Fitbit program. Healthy Living for Pain is an adaptation of the Health Enhancement Program, developed by Dr. Vranceanu and colleagues from Stony Brook, with adjustments for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The Healthy Living for Pain sessions provide educational information on chronic musculoskeletal pain, the role of sleep and nutrition, physical activity, healthcare management, medication use, and social connection. The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice journaling.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Rush University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female outpatients, age 18 years or older 2. Fluent in English 3. Have nonmalignant chronic musculoskeletal pain for more than 3 months 4. Able to perform a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) 5. Owns a smartphone with Bluetooth 4.0 or computer 6. Willingness and ability to participate in one of the 2 programs and to comply with the requirements of the study protocol. 7. Free of concurrent psychotropic medication for at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of treatment, OR stable on current medication for a minimum of 6 weeks and willing to maintain a stable dose 8. Low-level of activity (must meet 2/3 criteria; if difficult to assess, recruiter may ask participant to report their recent step data from their smartphone to better understand their activity level) 1. Sitting for more than 8 hours/day per self-report 2. Exercising for fewer than 3 days/week (30+min of exercise constitutes an "exercise day") per self-report 3. Walking for fewer than 7 days/week (30+min of walking constitutes a "walking day") per self-report

Exclusion criteria

1. Diagnosed with a medical illness expected to worsen in the next 6 months (e.g., malignancy) 2. Serious mental illness or instability for which hospitalization may be likely in the next 6 months 3. Current active suicidal ideation reported on self-report 4. Untreated and/or unstable schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or other psychotic disorder 5. Current, active substance abuse or dependence, and current alcohol dependence within the past 6 months 6. Practice of yoga, meditation, guided imagery or other mind body techniques that elicit the RR, once per week for \>45 min 3 times/week within the last 3 months or less. 7. Regular use of Fitbit DMD in the last 3 months 8. Unable to walk/in a wheelchair 9. Mild cognitive decline for participants 65+ only (Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire; PMSQ 4 or more errors).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recruitment Feasibility (Ability)1 YearAbility to enroll 80% or more of the sedentary chronic pain patients who meet study criteria.
Recruitment Feasibility (Timeliness) - Number of Participants Recruited in 1 Year1 YearTimeliness of enrollment; we will recruit a sample of 90 patients across the 3 sites over the course of 1 year. Participants will be considered enrolled upon randomization. Assessed by the number of participants enrolled in the study over the course of 1 year. If number enrolled meets or exceeds goal of 90 participants, the benchmark is considered met.
Feasibility of Recruitment Racial and Ethnic Minorities1 Year38% or more of the entire sample will be comprised of racial and ethnic minorities, which is consistent with the current USA demographic distribution.
Intervention Feasibility/ Adherence to SessionsPost-Test (10 Weeks)≥80 chronic pain patients attend ≥7/10 sessions for each program (70%)
Credibility and Expectancy Scale - CredibilityBaseline (0 Weeks)≥80 chronic pain patients with credibility scores higher than the Credibility and Expectancy Scale credibility subscale's mid-point, indicating intervention credibility. Credibility subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate higher perceived credibility for the program.
Client Satisfaction ScalePost-Test (10 Weeks)≥80 chronic pain patients with satisfaction scores higher than the scale's mid-point, indicating intervention satisfaction.
RetentionPost-test (10 weeks), Follow-up (24 weeks)≥80 post-treatment, ≥75% 6 months follow up for self-report, performance based and Actigraph data (this includes valid data for all participants).
Assessment Feasibility1 YearWe calculated the proportion of assessment procedures that were administered as intended in the the checklists of the study protocol. The number of assessment procedures that were administered in line with the study's protocol checklists was divided by the total number of assessment procedures. The benchmark was set to 90%, i.e., assessment procedures were deemed feasible if ≥90% of assessment procedures were delivered as specified in the protocol.
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - ExpectancyBaseline (0 weeks)≥80 chronic pain patients with expectancy scores higher than the subscale's mid-point, indicating intervention expectancy. Expectancy subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate more belief that treatment will help.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) ScaleBaseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)Rate of a participant's pain intensity and related interference in enjoyment of life and general activity, using a 0-10 Likert scale. Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores indicating greater pain and interference.
WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)The WHODAS measures level of functioning in six domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation. Each question on the scale is measured 0-4. The score range is 0-100, with higher scores indicating more disability.
6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)The 6MWT is a performance-based measure that assesses physical function and endurance.
ActiGraph GT9XBaseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)The ActiGraph GT9X is a step count device that objectively measures function (number of steps).
PROMIS Depression v1.08bBaseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)The PROMIS depression v1.08b measures negative mood, views of self and cognitions on a 5-point scale. Raw scores are converted into a t-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.
PROMIS Anxiety v1.08aBaseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)The PROMIS anxiety v1.08a measures fear, worry, hyperarousal and somatic symptoms. Each item is rated on a 1-5 point Likert Scale and raw scores are converted to t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicating more anxiety symptoms.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)A 13-item questionnaire assessing one's tendency to focus on pain-related thoughts and feel helpless and hopeless due to pain on a scale of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate higher pain catastrophizing. Scores range from 0 to 52.
Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK)Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)A 17-item questionnaire that assesses fear avoidance and fear of activity. Higher scores indicate higher kinesiophobia. Scores range from 17 to 68.
Measure of Current Status (MOCS)Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)The MOCS questionnaire assesses ability to engage in a series of healthy coping skills (e.g., relaxation, social support, adaptive thinking). Higher scores indicate a stronger ability to recognize stress and cope, with scores ranging from 10 to 50.
Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)Rate of a participant's broad conceptualization of mindfulness, items range from 1-4. Higher values reflect higher levels of mindfulness. Scores range from 12 to 48.
Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC)Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)3-items assessing the extent to which patients perceive the intervention improved functioning and symptoms. Each item is rated on a 1-7 point scale with higher scores indicated greater perceived improvement.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAna-Maria Vranceanu, PhD

Massachusetts General Hospital

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GetActive-Fitbit
GetActive-Fitbit is an adaptation of the original GetActive-Fitbit program, a mind-body program for the unique needs of individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain that incorporates activity skills to help individuals improve all aspects of physical function. The GetActive-Fitbit sessions address mind-body skills (e.g., mindfulness, deep breathing, self-compassion), walking skills (e.g., step goals, quota-based pacing), and skills to change thinking (e.g., identify unhelpful thoughts about pain and activity, challenging thoughts). The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice of skills and walking. GetActive-Fitbit: GetActive-Fitbit is an adaptation of the original GetActive-Fitbit program, a mind-body program for the unique needs of individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain that incorporates activity skills to help individuals improve all aspects of physical function. The GetActive-Fitbit sessions address mind-body skills (e.g., mindfulness, deep breathing, self-compassion), walking skills (e.g., step goals, quota-based pacing), and skills to change thinking (e.g., identify unhelpful thoughts about pain and activity, challenging thoughts). The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice of skills and walking.
47
Healthy Living for Pain
Healthy Living for Pain is an active intervention that will be dose, attention, and time matches to the GetActive-Fitbit program. Healthy Living for Pain is an adaptation of the Health Enhancement Program, developed by Dr. Vranceanu and colleagues from Stony Brook, with adjustments for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The Healthy Living for Pain sessions provide educational information on chronic musculoskeletal pain, the role of sleep and nutrition, physical activity, healthcare management, medication use, and social connection. The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice journaling. Healthy Living for Pain: Healthy Living for Pain is an active intervention that will be dose, attention, and time matches to the GetActive-Fitbit program. Healthy Living for Pain is an adaptation of the Health Enhancement Program, developed by Dr. Vranceanu and colleagues from Stony Brook, with adjustments for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The Healthy Living for Pain sessions provide educational information on chronic musculoskeletal pain, the role of sleep and nutrition, physical activity, healthcare management, medication use, and social connection. The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice journaling.
45
Total92

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGetActive-FitbitTotalHealthy Living for Pain
Age, Continuous55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
Education
Choose Not to Answer
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Education
Completed 4 years of college
15 Participants25 Participants10 Participants
Education
Completed high school or GED
12 Participants18 Participants6 Participants
Education
Graduate/professional degree
6 Participants15 Participants9 Participants
Education
Less than high school
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Education
Some college/Associates degree
11 Participants28 Participants17 Participants
Employment
Choose Not to Answer
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Employment
Employed full-time
9 Participants21 Participants12 Participants
Employment
Employed part-time
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Employment
Keeping House/Housemaker
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Employment
Other
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Employment
Retired
14 Participants30 Participants16 Participants
Employment
Unemployed
8 Participants13 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
39 Participants77 Participants38 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Income
$10,000 to less than $15,000
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Income
$15,000 to less than $20,000
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Income
$20,000 to less than $25,000
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Income
$25,000 to less than $35,000
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Income
$35,000 to less than $50,000
9 Participants12 Participants3 Participants
Income
$50,000 to less than $75,000
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Income
$75,000 or more
9 Participants20 Participants11 Participants
Income
Choose Not to Answer
7 Participants18 Participants11 Participants
Income
Less than $10,000
6 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Marital Status
Choose Not to Answer
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Marital Status
Living with significant other
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Marital Status
Married
16 Participants30 Participants14 Participants
Marital Status
Separated/Divorced
9 Participants16 Participants7 Participants
Marital Status
Single, never married
16 Participants29 Participants13 Participants
Marital Status
Widowed
2 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
21 Participants41 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants37 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
47 participants92 participants45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants69 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants23 Participants13 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender identity not listed
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Man
10 Participants23 Participants13 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Prefer not to say
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Woman
36 Participants68 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 470 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 4716 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 471 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Assessment Feasibility

We calculated the proportion of assessment procedures that were administered as intended in the the checklists of the study protocol. The number of assessment procedures that were administered in line with the study's protocol checklists was divided by the total number of assessment procedures. The benchmark was set to 90%, i.e., assessment procedures were deemed feasible if ≥90% of assessment procedures were delivered as specified in the protocol.

Time frame: 1 Year

Population: There are no arms/groups for this outcome because the benchmark was calculated based on percentage accuracy of assessment study procedures as conducted by staff not participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Assessment Feasibility3241 Number of assessment procedures
Primary

Client Satisfaction Scale

≥80 chronic pain patients with satisfaction scores higher than the scale's mid-point, indicating intervention satisfaction.

Time frame: Post-Test (10 Weeks)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Client Satisfaction Scalescored above the scale midpoint41 Participants
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Client Satisfaction Scalescored below the scale midpoint1 Participants
Healthy Living for PainClient Satisfaction Scalescored above the scale midpoint30 Participants
Healthy Living for PainClient Satisfaction Scalescored below the scale midpoint10 Participants
Primary

Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancy

≥80 chronic pain patients with expectancy scores higher than the subscale's mid-point, indicating intervention expectancy. Expectancy subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate more belief that treatment will help.

Time frame: Baseline (0 weeks)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancyscored above the scale midpoint36 Participants
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancyscored below the scale midpoint6 Participants
Healthy Living for PainCredibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancyscored above the scale midpoint26 Participants
Healthy Living for PainCredibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancyscored below the scale midpoint13 Participants
Primary

Credibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibility

≥80 chronic pain patients with credibility scores higher than the Credibility and Expectancy Scale credibility subscale's mid-point, indicating intervention credibility. Credibility subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate higher perceived credibility for the program.

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Credibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibilityscored below the scale midpoint0 Participants
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Credibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibilityscored above the scale midpoint41 Participants
Healthy Living for PainCredibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibilityscored below the scale midpoint5 Participants
Healthy Living for PainCredibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibilityscored above the scale midpoint34 Participants
Primary

Feasibility of Recruitment Racial and Ethnic Minorities

38% or more of the entire sample will be comprised of racial and ethnic minorities, which is consistent with the current USA demographic distribution.

Time frame: 1 Year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Feasibility of Recruitment Racial and Ethnic Minorities50 Participants
Primary

Intervention Feasibility/ Adherence to Sessions

≥80 chronic pain patients attend ≥7/10 sessions for each program (70%)

Time frame: Post-Test (10 Weeks)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Intervention Feasibility/ Adherence to SessionsAttended ≥7 out of 10 group or make-up sessions44 Participants
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Intervention Feasibility/ Adherence to SessionsAttended <7 out of 10 group or make-up sessions2 Participants
Healthy Living for PainIntervention Feasibility/ Adherence to SessionsAttended ≥7 out of 10 group or make-up sessions37 Participants
Healthy Living for PainIntervention Feasibility/ Adherence to SessionsAttended <7 out of 10 group or make-up sessions8 Participants
Primary

Recruitment Feasibility (Ability)

Ability to enroll 80% or more of the sedentary chronic pain patients who meet study criteria.

Time frame: 1 Year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Recruitment Feasibility (Ability)92 Participants
Primary

Recruitment Feasibility (Timeliness) - Number of Participants Recruited in 1 Year

Timeliness of enrollment; we will recruit a sample of 90 patients across the 3 sites over the course of 1 year. Participants will be considered enrolled upon randomization. Assessed by the number of participants enrolled in the study over the course of 1 year. If number enrolled meets or exceeds goal of 90 participants, the benchmark is considered met.

Time frame: 1 Year

Population: Arms are combined because benchmark is calculated prior to participant randomization to treatment group

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Recruitment Feasibility (Timeliness) - Number of Participants Recruited in 1 Year92 Participants
Primary

Retention

≥80 post-treatment, ≥75% 6 months follow up for self-report, performance based and Actigraph data (this includes valid data for all participants).

Time frame: Post-test (10 weeks), Follow-up (24 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)RetentionPost-TestCompleted self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data44 Participants
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)RetentionPost-TestDid not complete self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data3 Participants
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)RetentionFollow-UpCompleted self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data41 Participants
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)RetentionFollow-UpDid not complete self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data6 Participants
Healthy Living for PainRetentionFollow-UpDid not complete self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data8 Participants
Healthy Living for PainRetentionPost-TestCompleted self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data39 Participants
Healthy Living for PainRetentionFollow-UpCompleted self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data37 Participants
Healthy Living for PainRetentionPost-TestDid not complete self-report, performance-based, and objective data with valid data6 Participants
Secondary

6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

The 6MWT is a performance-based measure that assesses physical function and endurance.

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up assessments was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline289.62 metersStandard Deviation 77.61
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Post-Test339.20 metersStandard Deviation 80.32
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Follow-Up316.71 metersStandard Deviation 77.22
Healthy Living for Pain6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline260.28 metersStandard Deviation 76.26
Healthy Living for Pain6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Post-Test307.37 metersStandard Deviation 80.11
Healthy Living for Pain6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Follow-Up299.74 metersStandard Deviation 74.87
Secondary

ActiGraph GT9X

The ActiGraph GT9X is a step count device that objectively measures function (number of steps).

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

Population: The number of participants who received an ActiGraph at post-test and follow-up was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)ActiGraph GT9XBaseline2641.43 StepsStandard Deviation 1735.57
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)ActiGraph GT9XPost-Test3694.77 StepsStandard Deviation 2175.43
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)ActiGraph GT9XFollow-Up3050.62 StepsStandard Deviation 2023.89
Healthy Living for PainActiGraph GT9XBaseline3177.11 StepsStandard Deviation 2573.83
Healthy Living for PainActiGraph GT9XPost-Test3032.90 StepsStandard Deviation 2668.91
Healthy Living for PainActiGraph GT9XFollow-Up3290.56 StepsStandard Deviation 2496.78
Secondary

Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)

Rate of a participant's broad conceptualization of mindfulness, items range from 1-4. Higher values reflect higher levels of mindfulness. Scores range from 12 to 48.

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)Follow-Up32.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.42
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)Baseline32.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.68
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)Post-Test34.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.97
Healthy Living for PainCognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)Baseline34.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.98
Healthy Living for PainCognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)Post-Test34.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.52
Healthy Living for PainCognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS)Follow-Up35.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.88
Secondary

Measure of Current Status (MOCS)

The MOCS questionnaire assesses ability to engage in a series of healthy coping skills (e.g., relaxation, social support, adaptive thinking). Higher scores indicate a stronger ability to recognize stress and cope, with scores ranging from 10 to 50.

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Measure of Current Status (MOCS)Baseline2.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Measure of Current Status (MOCS)Post-Test2.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Measure of Current Status (MOCS)Follow-Up2.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Healthy Living for PainMeasure of Current Status (MOCS)Baseline2.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Healthy Living for PainMeasure of Current Status (MOCS)Post-Test2.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Healthy Living for PainMeasure of Current Status (MOCS)Follow-Up2.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Secondary

Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC)

3-items assessing the extent to which patients perceive the intervention improved functioning and symptoms. Each item is rated on a 1-7 point scale with higher scores indicated greater perceived improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC)Global Impressions of Change: Pain Management6.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC)Global Impressions of Change: Physical Function5.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Modified Global Impression of Change (MGIC)Global Impressions of Change: Emotional Wellbeing6.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Healthy Living for PainModified Global Impression of Change (MGIC)Global Impressions of Change: Pain Management5.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Healthy Living for PainModified Global Impression of Change (MGIC)Global Impressions of Change: Physical Function5.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Healthy Living for PainModified Global Impression of Change (MGIC)Global Impressions of Change: Emotional Wellbeing5.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
Secondary

Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

A 13-item questionnaire assessing one's tendency to focus on pain-related thoughts and feel helpless and hopeless due to pain on a scale of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate higher pain catastrophizing. Scores range from 0 to 52.

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Baseline20.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Post-Test11.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Follow-Up12.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.86
Healthy Living for PainPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Baseline19.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.56
Healthy Living for PainPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Post-Test16.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.81
Healthy Living for PainPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Follow-Up16.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.63
Secondary

Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) Scale

Rate of a participant's pain intensity and related interference in enjoyment of life and general activity, using a 0-10 Likert scale. Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores indicating greater pain and interference.

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) ScaleBaseline6.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) ScalePost-Test5.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) ScaleFollow-Up4.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Healthy Living for PainPain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) ScaleBaseline6.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Healthy Living for PainPain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) ScalePost-Test5.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
Healthy Living for PainPain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) ScaleFollow-Up5.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Secondary

PROMIS Anxiety v1.08a

The PROMIS anxiety v1.08a measures fear, worry, hyperarousal and somatic symptoms. Each item is rated on a 1-5 point Likert Scale and raw scores are converted to t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicating more anxiety symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)PROMIS Anxiety v1.08aBaseline57.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.49
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)PROMIS Anxiety v1.08aPost-Test55.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.84
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)PROMIS Anxiety v1.08aFollow-Up53.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.92
Healthy Living for PainPROMIS Anxiety v1.08aBaseline56.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.14
Healthy Living for PainPROMIS Anxiety v1.08aPost-Test54.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.08
Healthy Living for PainPROMIS Anxiety v1.08aFollow-Up53.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.97
Secondary

PROMIS Depression v1.08b

The PROMIS depression v1.08b measures negative mood, views of self and cognitions on a 5-point scale. Raw scores are converted into a t-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)PROMIS Depression v1.08bBaseline54.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.48
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)PROMIS Depression v1.08bPost-Test52.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.53
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)PROMIS Depression v1.08bFollow-Up52.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.75
Healthy Living for PainPROMIS Depression v1.08bBaseline54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.54
Healthy Living for PainPROMIS Depression v1.08bPost-Test52.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.49
Healthy Living for PainPROMIS Depression v1.08bFollow-Up52.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Secondary

Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK)

A 17-item questionnaire that assesses fear avoidance and fear of activity. Higher scores indicate higher kinesiophobia. Scores range from 17 to 68.

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK)Baseline39.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.39
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK)Post-Test34.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.86
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK)Follow-Up34.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Healthy Living for PainTampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK)Baseline40.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.84
Healthy Living for PainTampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK)Post-Test40.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Healthy Living for PainTampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK)Follow-Up39.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.52
Secondary

WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)

The WHODAS measures level of functioning in six domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation. Each question on the scale is measured 0-4. The score range is 0-100, with higher scores indicating more disability.

Time frame: Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

Population: The number of participants who completed post-test and follow-up surveys was fewer than baselines because of patients discontinuing participation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)Baseline48.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.35
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)Post-Test35.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.09
All Participants (GetActive Fitbit and Healthy Living for Pain)WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)Follow-Up34.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.03
Healthy Living for PainWHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)Baseline44.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.04
Healthy Living for PainWHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)Post-Test39.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.02
Healthy Living for PainWHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)Follow-Up36.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.57

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026