Skip to content

Outpatient Ultrasound for the Diagnostic Work-up of Oropharynx Cancer

Surgeon-performed Outpatient Transoral and Transcervical Ultrasound for the Diagnostic Work-up of Oropharynx Cancer: a Feasibility Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05698667
Enrollment
26
Registered
2023-01-26
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2022-05-01
Last updated
2023-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Base of Tongue Carcinoma, Base of Tongue Tumor, Oropharynx Cancer, Oropharynx Neoplasm, Tonsil Cancer, Tonsil Hypertrophy, Tonsil Lymphoma, Tonsil Neoplasm

Brief summary

The aim of the study was to examine the detection rate and tumor size evaluation in patients with suspected oropharynx cancer using a new technique with transoral ultrasound of the oropharynx. The new technique was compared to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The study investigators included patients referred to a tertiary head & neck cancer center in Copenhagen, Denmark, with suspicion of oropharynx cancer. Patients supplied written informed consent and were included and ultrasound scanned with local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic. Blinded assessment of MRI's was performed for tumor detection and compared to ultrasound with the reference standard being histopathology biopsy results.

Detailed description

An explorative diagnostic study was performed at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Denmark from October 1st, 2021, to April 30th, 2022. The study investigators invited adult patients from the outpatient cancer clinic referred with a suspicion of oropharynx cancer to participate in the study. At the study investigators' center, all head & neck cancer patients receive diagnostic work-up which includes clinical exam, flexible laryngoscopy with narrow-band imaging, surgeon-performed neck ultrasound and biopsy and/or cytology with same-day results. Patients were enrolled after verbal and written consent and were offered an ultrasound examination of the oropharynx as an addition to the standard diagnostic workup in the outpatient clinic. All included patients also received an MRI of the head and neck. Clinical data including age, sex, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, date of MRI scan, and histopathology results were obtained from medical charts after inclusion. Interventions included transoral ultrasound of the tonsils and base of tongue, conducted with BK5000 ultrasound machines using the X18L5s hockey stick transducer. Transcervical ultrasound was also performed in patients where a tongue base cancer was most likely. Standard linear neck transducers (X18L5) or a curved 9C2 transducer was used. The tonsils and tongue base were scanned in two planes if possible, and doppler flow was recorded as well. Ultrasound images were stored as video clips. The detection of tumors with ultrasound was recorded as positive if a well-defined tumor was seen that was clearly visualized compared to the contralateral side. A negative result was given if no tumors were suspected on either side. An inconclusive result was given if a tumor was not clear, but there was suspicious asymmetry visualized. The anatomical sub-location of tumors were stratified into right and left tonsil, tongue base, overlapping tonsil and tongue base, and other sub-locations. Other sub-locations included the soft palate, uvula, oropharynx posterior wall, vallecula, anterior pharyngeal arch and posterior pharyngeal arch. MRI was used as the reference test. An expert neuroradiologist blinded to ultrasound results and histopathology rated all tests for tumor detection in the oropharynx and tumor size in detected tumors. Statistical analysis: Tumor detection of oropharynx ultrasound and MRI will be compared using the histopathologic diagnosis (cancer or benign) as reference standard to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive- and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV). Inconclusive tests will be analyzed as a positive result due to the clinical consequences often leading to diagnostic tonsillectomy. McNemar's test for differences between sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV between ultrasound and MRI will be calculated. The greatest tumor diameter will be compared between ultrasound and MRI using scatter plots and the Pearson's R correlation coefficient. Tumor volumes calculated using the formula for an ellipse: π/6 \* craniocaudal \* anteroposterior \* mediolateral will be compared. Statistical analysis will be performed using R software version 4.2.2.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTransoral ultrasound

Under local anesthetic with xylocaine spray in the oropharynx, the tonsils and tongue base are scanned with small-footprint, high-frequency ultrasound transducers (such as the 18XL5s hockey-stick from BK Medical)

The tongue base and tonsils are scanned externally via the neck, where a (preferably low-frequency) transducer is placed onto the skin above the hyoid bone to visualize the tongue base. The tonsils are visualized adjacent to the tongue base on either side and are located deep to the submandibular glands in a oblique coronal plane.

Sponsors

The Novo Nordic Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(any of the following): * Visible and/or palpable tumor or asymmetry of the tonsils, tongue base or oropharynx. * Subjective symptoms of oropharynx cancer including dysphagia, odynophagia and/or referred otalgia.

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to understand Danish or English. * Unable to provide written informed consent. * Age younger than 18 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients with oropharynx cancer detected by ultrasound compared to MRIWithin two weeks.Patients with cancer (histopathology verified) correctly detected by a positive ultrasound or MRI test result.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Greatest tumor diameter compared between ultrasound and MRI.1 dayGreatest tumor diameter measured in millimeters.
Proportion of patients without oropharynx cancer detected by ultrasound compared to MRIWithin three months.Patients with benign tonsillar asymmetry (histopathology verified) correctly detected by a negative ultrasound or MRI test result.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026