Skip to content

Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Management

The Effect of Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Pain Management Cesarean Delivery Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05697315
Enrollment
56
Registered
2023-01-25
Start date
2021-12-01
Completion date
2022-04-01
Last updated
2023-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Post Operative Pain

Keywords

Pain, postoperative analgesia, Erector spinae plane block, cesarean section

Brief summary

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is an interfacial plane block with visceral and somatic analgesic activity at paraspinal muscles. This study aims to examine the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ESP block after cesarean section (CS) with Pfannenstiel incision under spinal anesthesia.

Detailed description

The study included 54 patients with mild systemic disease (ASA II patients) who would undergo elective CS under spinal anesthesia. They were randomly divided into an ESP block group (Group E) and a control group (Group C). After the surgery, Group E patients underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral ESP block with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine at the lateral decubitus position, while Group C received no intervention. Patients in both groups received parenteral patient-controlled analgesia. The patients' post-operative 24-hour opioid consumption, regular Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measurements, and need for rescue analgesics were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21 program. Demographic and other data were assessed using independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square analysis.

Interventions

PROCEDUREControl

No block was performed

PROCEDUREErector spinae plane block

Erector spinae plane block was performed, tramadol was administered with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and all patients were followed in the ward.

Sponsors

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ASA II patients * 18-45 years who underwent CS with Pfannenstiel incision under spinal anesthesia * agreed to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with infection at the injection site * Coagulopathy Allergy to amide-type local anesthetics * History of peripheral neuropathy * Hepatic and/or renal failure * Refusing the procedure * patients with heart disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
24-hour opioid consumptionup to 24 hourThe amount of tramadol consumed in milligrams in the first 24 hours was determined with a patient-controlled analgesia pump.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale (Vas)0, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hourspain scores,graded from 0 to 10, 0 no pain, 10 highest pain experienced

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026