Skip to content

Functional Tests to Resolve Unsolved Rare Diseases. Rares.

Resolving Unsolved Rare Diseases : Functional Tests and New Diagnosis Strategy to Study Genetic Variants From High-throughput Sequencing (RID)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05696912
Acronym
RID
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-01-25
Start date
2023-01-30
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2024-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Albinism, Congenital Heart Defect, Cystic Fibrosis, Intellectual Disability, Neurodegeneration With Brain Iron Accumulation (NBIA), Periventricular Nodular Heterotopia, Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome

Keywords

Variant of unknown significance, Functional genetics, Translational research, RNAseq, Gene expression regulation

Brief summary

Rares diseases are a heterogeneous group of conditions which need important tools for diagnosis. The use of high-throughput sequencing is able to diagnose half of the patients. For the other part it is impossible to conclude due to the presence of variants of unknown significance (VOUS). Functional analysis are needed to bring strong argument to reclassify variants as pathogenic or benign. The main objective is to evaluate the diagnosis yield of this strategy.

Detailed description

The main objective is the improvement of the diagnosis of rare genetic diseases. The investigator lab is expert for diagnosis of some rare diseases such as neurodevelopmental disorder, albinism, cystic fibrosis and congenital heart defect. Actually with implementation of high-throughput sequencing for diagnosis, a high number of genetic variants are found and need to be interpretated. The ACMG classification is used to classify variants with argument of variant frequency, predicted effect on protein and in-silico prediction. Functional evidence is a strong argument to help classify VOUS. The investigators propose the use of RNA-Seq, minigene and luciferase assay for study of VOUS to bring argument to classify them as benign or pathogenic.

Interventions

GENETICEx-vivo approach concerning 25 patients

Ex-vivo approach concerning 25 patients with blood sample in PAXgene tubes or skin biopsy and RNA-Seq analysis

GENETICIn-vitro approach concerning 25 patients

In-vitro approach concerning 25 patients without specific samples needed for analysis in minigene or luciferase assay

Sponsors

University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Ex-vivo approach concerning 25 patients with blood sample in PAXgene tubes or skin biopsy and RNA-Seq analysis. In-vitro approach concerning 25 patients without specific samples needed for analysis in minigene or luciferase assay.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Minor and adult patient. * Registered for the social security system. * Informed consent signed by patient or parent of a minor patient. * Patient affected by one of the rare diseases studied (albinism, congenital heart defect, cystic fibrosis, neurodevelopmental disease) * Patient bearing variants of unknown significance (VOUS)

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to participate in research protocol. * Patient under administrative supervision * Pregnant or nursing women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of VOUS reclassified as pathogenic (class 5) or benign (class 1)Inclusion visitIt's the proportion of VOUS that could be definitively reclassified as pathogenic (class 5) or benign (class 1) according to the ACMG classification (Richards et al., 2015 and Appendix 1). Indeed currently only variants considered as pathogenic or probably pathogenic make it possible to confirm a diagnosis and to propose genetic offer genetic counseling to families and perform a prenatal diagnosis. This is an evaluation that will be carried out at the end of the analyses carried out

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pre-analysis process : Time of sample transport to the laboratoryInclusion visitTime of transport to the laboratory. To calculate this time, the time of collection and the time of receipt by the and the time of reception by the molecular genetics technician will be recorded
Pre-analysis process : Quality of RNA extraction (RNA Integrity Number, RIN)Inclusion visitRNA quality measurement by RIN (RNA integrity number): very good \>7, good \>/=5, poor \<5. Only RNA with RIN \>5 will be retained.
Praticability :Characteristics and number of CPU (Central Processing Unit)Inclusion visitEvaluation of bioinformatic ressources by measure of number of CPU needed and turnaround time for processing data
Praticability : Training time of Biologists for interpretationInclusion visitEvaluation of training time needed to interpret the data
Global costInclusion visitEvaluation of cost of global analyse and each test

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactVincent MICHAUD
vincent.michaud@chu-bordeaux.fr+335 57 82 01 93
Backup ContactNdeye-Fatou NGOM
ndeye-fatou.ngom@chu-bordeaux.fr

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026