Skip to content

Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression - Pilot Study

Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD) - Phase 1

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05695209
Acronym
EQUIPD-Pilot
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-01-23
Start date
2023-06-22
Completion date
2024-04-23
Last updated
2025-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Depression, Health Equity

Keywords

chronic pain, depression, health equity, shared decision making, decision aid

Brief summary

This project is part of the NIH Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) initiative (https://heal.nih.gov/). This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) is part of phase 1 of a two-phase, 5-year project with the overarching goal of testing a decision aid (DA)/coaching intervention, tailored to Black patients with comorbid chronic pain and depression, to encourage use of and adherence to nonpharmacological pain treatments (NPTs). This 2-arm pilot trial randomized 30 Black patients with comorbid chronic musculoskeletal pain and depression in primary care from an urban safety-net health system. After the baseline assessment, patients randomized to the intervention were asked to participate in 4 coaching sessions over approximately 12 weeks. Sessions used Motivational Interviewing principles to foster openness to NPTs and self-efficacy by helping patients identify their goals and priorities, understand their NPT options, prepare them to discuss and choose options with their primary care providers (PCPs), and reinforce these choices to foster maintenance of these changes. DA contents were integrated into these sessions, which facilitated discussion of these options with their PCP. The first 3 sessions ideally took place prior to the patient's next scheduled PCP visit; the final session occurred after this visit. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 months (i.e., after completing the final coaching session), and 6 months. Patients randomized to the wait-list control group received usual care (in addition to study assessments at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months). After completing the final assessment, they were given the DA and offered a 20-minute coaching session to walk them through it (patients could decline the coaching session).

Interventions

Four (4) coaching sessions over approximately 12 weeks with integration of Decision Aid contents

Sponsors

Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Eligible patients must: * have musculoskeletal pain in the low back, cervical spine, or extremities (hip, knee, shoulder) for ≥3 months, * have at least moderate pain intensity and interference with function, defined by a score ≥4 (possible range: 0-10) on the Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity scale (PEG), a 3-item measure of pain intensity, interference with enjoyment of life, and interference with general activity, * have at least mild depression, defined as PHQ-8 score ≥5, * identify as Black or African American, * have consistent access to a telephone, * indicate openness to new pain treatments, and * have a scheduled appointment with their PCP in the next approximate 2-4 months

Exclusion criteria

Patients are excluded: * if previously participated in the PI's past pilot study (IRB #12885) or participation as a Patient Engagement Panel member for this project, * if medical records indicate severe medical conditions likely precluding participation (e.g., NY Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure), or * if the eligibility screener reveals (1) active suicidal ideation, or (2) severe hearing/speech or cognitive impairment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale at 3 Months3 monthsThe pain interference score averages seven ratings, 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interferes completely), of interference with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.
Change From Baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale at 6 Months6 monthsThe pain interference score averages seven ratings, 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interferes completely), of interference with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) at 3 Months3 monthsAnxiety will be measured with the 7 item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 is scored by assigning a value of 0 to 3 to each of the seven items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. The total score indicates the severity of anxiety symptoms (higher scores indicating a worse outcome).
Change From Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) at 6 Months6 monthsAnxiety will be measured with the 7 item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 is scored by assigning a value of 0 to 3 to each of the seven items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. The total score indicates the severity of anxiety symptoms (higher scores indicating a worse outcome).
Change From Baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 3 Months3 monthsThe Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item scale that assesses catastrophizing-a cognitive-emotional factor that predicts poor treatment response. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 6 Months6 monthsThe Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item scale that assesses catastrophizing-a cognitive-emotional factor that predicts poor treatment response. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure at 3 Months3 monthsPatient engagement will be measured with the 12-item Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure, which has 3 subscales: 1) commitment to manage one's health, 2) informed choice, and 3) confidence to participate in treatment decisions. Each item is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) with a total score ranging from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate greater engagement.
Change From Baseline Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure at 6 Months6 monthsPatient engagement will be measured with the 12-item Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure, which has 3 subscales: 1) commitment to manage one's health, 2) informed choice, and 3) confidence to participate in treatment decisions. Each item is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) with a total score ranging from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate greater engagement.
Change From Baseline Use of Nonpharmacological and Self-Care Approaches (NSCAP) at 3 Months3 monthsThe NSCAP asks about 9 nonpharmacological treatment (NPT) modalities and assesses details of use such as frequency, location/source of service, and patients' judgments of effectiveness. Space is also provided for other NPTs that are used but not listed. The number of modalities for which patients answer yes will be summed for analyses.
Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 at 3 Months3 monthsThe PHQ-8 is a widely-used, validated 8-item measure of depression severity. The PHQ-8 is scored by assigning a value of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) to each of the 8 items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate worse depression severity.
Change From Baseline Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Scale (PEPPI-5) at 3 Months3 monthsCommunication self-efficacy will be measured with this 5-item scale that measures patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and getting their most important health concern discussed in a clinic visit. Higher scores indicate greater communication self-efficacy. The scale uses ratings from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (extremely confident) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 50.
Change From Baseline Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Scale (PEPPI-5) at 6 Months6 monthsCommunication self-efficacy will be measured with this 5-item scale that measures patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and getting their most important health concern discussed in a clinic visit. Higher scores indicate greater communication self-efficacy. The scale uses ratings from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (extremely confident) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 50.
Change From Baseline CollaboRATE at 3 Months3 monthsShared decision making will be measured with CollaboRATE, a 3-item measure assessing provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making during a recent appointment. The CollaboRATE scale uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from No effort was made (0) to Every effort was made (4) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate higher provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making.
Change From Baseline CollaboRATE at 6 Months6 monthsShared decision making will be measured with CollaboRATE, a 3-item measure assessing provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making during a recent appointment. The CollaboRATE scale uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from No effort was made (0) to Every effort was made (4) or each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate higher provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making.
Change From Baseline Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form at 3 Months3 monthsThe Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form assesses patient-provider agreement on treatment goals, collaboration to achieve these goals, and degree of emotional bond (liking and trust) between patients and providers. The scale uses ratings from 1 (Never) to 7 (Always) for each item with a total score ranging from 12 to 84. Higher scores indicate greater alliance between patient and provider.
Change From Baseline Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form at 6 Months6 monthsThe Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form assesses patient-provider agreement on treatment goals, collaboration to achieve these goals, and degree of emotional bond (liking and trust) between patients and providers. The scale uses ratings from 1 (Never) to 7 (Always) or each item with a total score ranging from 12 to 84. Higher scores indicate greater alliance between patient and provider.
Change From Baseline Use of Nonpharmacological and Self-Care Approaches (NSCAP) at 6 Months6 monthsThe NSCAP asks about 9 nonpharmacological treatment (NPT) modalities and assesses details of use such as frequency, location/source of service, and patients' judgments of effectiveness. Space is also provided for other NPTs that are used but not listed. The number of modalities for which patients answer yes will be summed for analyses.
Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 at 6 Months6 monthsThe PHQ-8 is a widely-used, validated 8-item measure of depression severity. The PHQ-8 is scored by assigning a value of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) to each of the 8 items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate worse depression severity.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Potentially eligible participants (primary care patients within an academic, safety-net healthcare system) were identified through electronic medical records and sent a letter and brochure describing the study. A study team member followed up with a phone call to assess interest and, if interested, screen for eligibility.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Coaching and Decision Aid
Individual coaching sessions and Decision Aid Coaching and Decision Aid: Four (4) coaching sessions over approximately 12 weeks with integration of Decision Aid contents
16
Control
Wait-list control group
14
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
3-monthsUnable to contact for 3-month data collection01
3-monthsWithdrawal by Subject20
6-monthsLost to Follow-up11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalCoaching and Decision Aid
Age, Continuous61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
Current relationship status
Divorced/Separated
7 Participants10 Participants3 Participants
Current relationship status
Married/Domestic Partner
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Current relationship status
Never Married
2 Participants10 Participants8 Participants
Current relationship status
Other
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Current relationship status
Widowed
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Employment status
Full-time employment
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Employment status
Not employed
7 Participants20 Participants13 Participants
Employment status
Part-time employment
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants30 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Highest level of education completed
Associate's or Technical Degree Complete
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Highest level of education completed
College/Baccalaureate/Doctoral or Postgraduate Education
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Highest level of education completed
High School (or Secondary School) Degree Complete
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Highest level of education completed
Some Secondary School or High School Education
1 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Household income
Comfortable
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Household income
Just enough to make ends meet
8 Participants18 Participants10 Participants
Household income
Not enough to make ends meet
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Pain duration146.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 165.9
143.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 139.5
140.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 117.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
14 Participants28 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants30 participants16 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
9 Participants21 Participants12 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 140 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 140 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 140 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale at 3 Months

The pain interference score averages seven ratings, 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interferes completely), of interference with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale at 3 Months-1.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
ControlChange From Baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale at 3 Months-0.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.24
Primary

Change From Baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale at 6 Months

The pain interference score averages seven ratings, 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interferes completely), of interference with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale at 6 Months-1.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
ControlChange From Baseline Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Scale at 6 Months-1.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Secondary

Change From Baseline Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure at 3 Months

Patient engagement will be measured with the 12-item Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure, which has 3 subscales: 1) commitment to manage one's health, 2) informed choice, and 3) confidence to participate in treatment decisions. Each item is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) with a total score ranging from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate greater engagement.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure at 3 Months2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.96
ControlChange From Baseline Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure at 3 Months-2.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.16
Secondary

Change From Baseline Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure at 6 Months

Patient engagement will be measured with the 12-item Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure, which has 3 subscales: 1) commitment to manage one's health, 2) informed choice, and 3) confidence to participate in treatment decisions. Each item is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) with a total score ranging from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate greater engagement.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure at 6 Months4.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.16
ControlChange From Baseline Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure at 6 Months-0.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.93
Secondary

Change From Baseline CollaboRATE at 3 Months

Shared decision making will be measured with CollaboRATE, a 3-item measure assessing provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making during a recent appointment. The CollaboRATE scale uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from No effort was made (0) to Every effort was made (4) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate higher provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline CollaboRATE at 3 Months0.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
ControlChange From Baseline CollaboRATE at 3 Months-0.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Secondary

Change From Baseline CollaboRATE at 6 Months

Shared decision making will be measured with CollaboRATE, a 3-item measure assessing provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making during a recent appointment. The CollaboRATE scale uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from No effort was made (0) to Every effort was made (4) or each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate higher provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline CollaboRATE at 6 Months0.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
ControlChange From Baseline CollaboRATE at 6 Months-0.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Secondary

Change From Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) at 3 Months

Anxiety will be measured with the 7 item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 is scored by assigning a value of 0 to 3 to each of the seven items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. The total score indicates the severity of anxiety symptoms (higher scores indicating a worse outcome).

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) at 3 Months-3.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.01
ControlChange From Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) at 3 Months-0.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) at 6 Months

Anxiety will be measured with the 7 item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 is scored by assigning a value of 0 to 3 to each of the seven items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. The total score indicates the severity of anxiety symptoms (higher scores indicating a worse outcome).

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) at 6 Months-3.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.75
ControlChange From Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) at 6 Months-0.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 3 Months

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item scale that assesses catastrophizing-a cognitive-emotional factor that predicts poor treatment response. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 3 Months-4.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.26
ControlChange From Baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 3 Months3.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.78
Secondary

Change From Baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 6 Months

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item scale that assesses catastrophizing-a cognitive-emotional factor that predicts poor treatment response. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 6 Months-5.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.39
ControlChange From Baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 6 Months-2.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.01
Secondary

Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 at 3 Months

The PHQ-8 is a widely-used, validated 8-item measure of depression severity. The PHQ-8 is scored by assigning a value of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) to each of the 8 items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate worse depression severity.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 at 3 Months-2.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.57
ControlChange From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 at 3 Months-0.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.44
Secondary

Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 at 6 Months

The PHQ-8 is a widely-used, validated 8-item measure of depression severity. The PHQ-8 is scored by assigning a value of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) to each of the 8 items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate worse depression severity.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 at 6 Months-2.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.18
ControlChange From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 at 6 Months-0.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.75
Secondary

Change From Baseline Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Scale (PEPPI-5) at 3 Months

Communication self-efficacy will be measured with this 5-item scale that measures patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and getting their most important health concern discussed in a clinic visit. Higher scores indicate greater communication self-efficacy. The scale uses ratings from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (extremely confident) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 50.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Scale (PEPPI-5) at 3 Months0.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.45
ControlChange From Baseline Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Scale (PEPPI-5) at 3 Months2.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Scale (PEPPI-5) at 6 Months

Communication self-efficacy will be measured with this 5-item scale that measures patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and getting their most important health concern discussed in a clinic visit. Higher scores indicate greater communication self-efficacy. The scale uses ratings from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (extremely confident) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 50.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Scale (PEPPI-5) at 6 Months1.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.41
ControlChange From Baseline Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions Scale (PEPPI-5) at 6 Months0.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.71
Secondary

Change From Baseline Use of Nonpharmacological and Self-Care Approaches (NSCAP) at 3 Months

The NSCAP asks about 9 nonpharmacological treatment (NPT) modalities and assesses details of use such as frequency, location/source of service, and patients' judgments of effectiveness. Space is also provided for other NPTs that are used but not listed. The number of modalities for which patients answer yes will be summed for analyses.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Use of Nonpharmacological and Self-Care Approaches (NSCAP) at 3 Months0.23 counts of NPTsStandard Deviation 1.96
ControlChange From Baseline Use of Nonpharmacological and Self-Care Approaches (NSCAP) at 3 Months-0.46 counts of NPTsStandard Deviation 1.61
Secondary

Change From Baseline Use of Nonpharmacological and Self-Care Approaches (NSCAP) at 6 Months

The NSCAP asks about 9 nonpharmacological treatment (NPT) modalities and assesses details of use such as frequency, location/source of service, and patients' judgments of effectiveness. Space is also provided for other NPTs that are used but not listed. The number of modalities for which patients answer yes will be summed for analyses.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Use of Nonpharmacological and Self-Care Approaches (NSCAP) at 6 Months0.38 counts of NPTsStandard Deviation 1.5
ControlChange From Baseline Use of Nonpharmacological and Self-Care Approaches (NSCAP) at 6 Months0.54 counts of NPTsStandard Deviation 1.94
Secondary

Change From Baseline Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form at 3 Months

The Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form assesses patient-provider agreement on treatment goals, collaboration to achieve these goals, and degree of emotional bond (liking and trust) between patients and providers. The scale uses ratings from 1 (Never) to 7 (Always) for each item with a total score ranging from 12 to 84. Higher scores indicate greater alliance between patient and provider.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form at 3 Months3.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.34
ControlChange From Baseline Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form at 3 Months-5.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form at 6 Months

The Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form assesses patient-provider agreement on treatment goals, collaboration to achieve these goals, and degree of emotional bond (liking and trust) between patients and providers. The scale uses ratings from 1 (Never) to 7 (Always) or each item with a total score ranging from 12 to 84. Higher scores indicate greater alliance between patient and provider.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Decision AidChange From Baseline Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form at 6 Months5.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.78
ControlChange From Baseline Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form at 6 Months-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.05

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026