Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Clinical Safety and Performance of the CorNeat KPro for Treatment of Corneal Blindness

A Single Arm, Open Label, Multicenter Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Clinical Safety and Performance of the CorNeat Keratoprosthesis, for Treatment of Corneal Blindness

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05694247
Enrollment
15
Registered
2023-01-23
Start date
2024-06-27
Completion date
2026-05-04
Last updated
2026-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Corneal Disease, Corneal Injuries, Corneal Opacity

Brief summary

A Single Arm, Pivotal, Open Label, Multicenter Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Clinical Safety and Performance of the CorNeat Keratoprosthesis, for Treatment of Corneal Blindness

Detailed description

This clinical trial will assess the clinical safety and performance of the CorNeat Keratoprosthesis (KPro), a synthetic, artificial cornea for or the treatment of corneal blindness in subjects who are not candidates for traditional corneal transplant. 40 subjects who are willing to take part in the study will undergo screening examinations to verify their eligibility. The CorNeat KPro will be implanted unilaterally in eligible subjects. Follow up procedures will be performed at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,8, 10,12,15,18,21 and 24 months post-surgery and will include clinical assessment of the implanted eye using slit-lamp biomicroscopy, intra ocular pressure measurement and ocular imaging. Additionally, subjects' visual acuity will be assessed and recorded throughout the 24 months follow up period.

Interventions

The optical component of the CorNeat KPro will be implanted into a circular disc of the cornea (as performed in standard penetrating keratoplasty surgery) and the skirt component will be embedded under a 360º conjunctival flap.

Sponsors

CorNeat Vision Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female aged ≥ 21 and ≤ 80 years on the day of screening 2. Candidates must have the ability and willingness to attend all scheduled visits and comply with all study procedures 3. Legally blind (BCVA of 6/120 or worse in the better eye) in one or two eyes. In case of unilateral blindness - BCVA of Counting Fingers (CF) from 1 meter or worse in the operated eye 4. Keratoprosthesis surgery is indicated in cases when keratoplasty is not a reasonable option or following a verifiable history of prior failed corneal transplantation. 5. Indications that fall under poor candidate for keratoplasty include but are not limited to: herpetic keratitis, vascularized corneal scar, Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid, alkali burn, Steven Johnson Syndrome, and limbal stem cell deficiency; 6. Adequate tear film and lid function 7. Perception of light in all quadrants 8. Female patients of childbearing age must have negative pregnancy test at screening and agree to use an effective method of contraception throughout the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Reasonable chance of success with traditional keratoplasty 2. Current retinal detachment 3. Connective tissue diseases or severely scarred conjunctiva in the target eye 4. End stage glaucoma or evidence of current uncontrolled glaucoma 5. History or evidence of severe inflammatory eye diseases (i.e. conjunctivitis, uveitis, retinitis, scleritis) 6. Active inflammation of the conjunctiva in one or both eyes 7. History of ocular or periocular malignancy 8. History of extensive keloid formation 9. Any known intolerance or hypersensitivity to topical anaesthetics, mydriatics, or component of the device 10. Ocular ischemic syndrome 11. Signs of current infection, including fever and current treatment with antibiotics 12. Severe generalized disease that results in a life expectancy shorter than two years 13. Any clinical evidence that the investigator feels would place the subject at increased risk with the placement of the device 14. Corneal thickness less than 400 or higher than 1,200 microns in any region of the pachymetry map of the eye intended to be operated 15. Currently pregnant or breastfeeding 16. Participation in any study involving an investigational drug or device within the past 30 days or 5 half-lives of the drug (whichever longer) or ongoing participation in a study with an investigational drug or device 17. Intraoperative complication that would preclude implantation of the study device 18. Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) higher than 8% at screening indicating unbalanced diabetes and/or target organ damage associated with diabetes 19. Patients requiring anticoagulation treatment, which cannot be interrupted for the surgical procedure 20. Vulnerable populations - minors, pregnant women, prisoners, sponsor or study institution employees, military persons, terminally ill, comatose, physically and intellectually challenged individuals, institutionalized patients and refugees 21. Subjects with corneal disorders located outside the central 7 mm, such as Mooren ulcer, peripheral ulcerative keratitis, and necrotizing herpetic keratitis (if located outside the central 7 mm of the cornea) 22. Patients with a functioning trabeculectomy or existing Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) device that shunts aqueous from the anterior chamber into the subconjunctival space

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety AssessmentThroughout 24 months post-opThe frequency of all Unanticipated Adverse Device-related Events (UADE) during and following implantation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retention rate24 months post-opThe number of retained devices at the end of 24- months follow up period will be calculated
Change in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) from baselineThroughout 24 months post-opVisual acuity will be measured with ETDRS format charts. The number of patients with BCDVA better than 6/120 at 24 months after

Countries

Canada, France, Israel, Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 8, 2026