Skip to content

Evaluation of Maxillary Canine Retraction Assisted With Two Different Methods of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound

Evaluation of Maxillary Canine Retraction Assisted With Two Different Methods of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound: A Controlled Clinical Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05692817
Enrollment
16
Registered
2023-01-20
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2025-07-01
Last updated
2023-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Brief summary

The current clinical study will be done for evaluation of maxillary canine retraction assisted with application of two different methods of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound.

Interventions

The total sample will be randomly divided into two equal groups (according to method of application of the lipus on the intervention side)as follows: ■ Group I: will include 8 patients who will receive lipus with maxillary canine retraction that will be performed every (3 weeks) on intervention 6 sides according to a standardized protocol. ▪ Group II: will include 8 patients who will receive lipus that will be performed every (1 week) on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol.

Sponsors

Ammar Kasem Alzoubi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 22 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- All patients should satisfy the following criteria: 1. An age ranges from 15-22 years. 2. Severe crowding or protrusion requiring 1st premolar extractions followed by symmetrical canine retraction. 3. All permanent teeth present, 3rd molars are excluded. 4. Good oral hygiene. 5. No systemic disease/medication that could interfere with orthodontic tooth Movement (OTM). 6. No previous orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Patient diagnosed to have an indication for non-extraction approach. 2. Poor oral hygiene or periodontally compromised patient. 5 3. Patient with craniofacial anomalies or previous history of trauma, bruxism or parafunctions. 4. Previous orthodontic treatment. 5. Any implanted assistive devices (e.g., pacemakers, cochlear implants, etc.) 6. Pregnant females.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of canine retractionfour monthsdistance

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAmmar Alzoubi
ammar.alzoubi91@gmail.com01200726270

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026