Skip to content

Technology Based Sedentary Reduction Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Technology-Based Sedentary Reduction Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05691452
Enrollment
31
Registered
2023-01-20
Start date
2023-01-24
Completion date
2024-07-30
Last updated
2025-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Type 2 Diabetes

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to develop and test an 8-week sedentary behavior reduction intervention (Sit Less program) for patients with type 2 diabetes. The program aims to reduce and break sitting times among this population using an objective activity monitor and mHealth. The investigators will test the program to help diabetes patients break up sitting time, reduce daily sitting time, and move more. The investigators will also study preliminary effects of the SB reduction intervention on light physical activity, cardiometabolic markers and patient-centered outcomes, and whether diabetes patients like the program and can follow it.

Detailed description

The investigators propose to develop and conduct a pilot study to test a wearable technology-based sedentary behavior reduction intervention in type 2 diabetes patients. The participants in the first cohort (n=15), 'Sit Less Version 1' will be randomized to either the control group or the sedentary behavior reduction intervention group. The intervention group will target a 120 minute per day reduction in sedentary behavior using an objective activity monitor and mHealth. The study will have an iterative design process with multiple cohorts. After the first cohort completed the study, we will collect their feedback to modify the Sit Less program. With Sit Less Version 2, Cohort 2 (n=20) participants will participate in the intervention as a single group, without randomization. The Sit Less Version 2 will be 8 weeks long. Specifically, the study aims to: determine the feasibility and acceptability of the sedentary behavior reduction intervention in type 2 diabetes patients by evaluating reach, retention, satisfaction, and compliance with the intervention; evaluate the preliminary efficacy of the sedentary behavior reduction intervention on changes in sedentary time; and explore preliminary effects of the sedentary reduction intervention on physical activity, cardiometabolic markers and patient-centered outcomes.

Interventions

The intervention group will target a 120 minute per day reduction in sedentary behavior using an objective activity monitor and mHealth. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and post-intervention.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ages 18 and above * diagnosed with type 2 diabetes * self-reported HbA1C\<13 * self-report of sitting ≥ 8hr/day * ability to stand and walk * ownership of a smartphone.

Exclusion criteria

* currently using an activity tracker * use of insulin * random blood glucose \>300 * currently participating in exercise or other research programs * non-English speaking * patients who are classified as unstable (e.g. heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmia) or have kidney disease that limits daily water intake, or any other conditions contradictory to standing or walking * currently pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes of Sit-to-stand TransitionsBaseline and 8 weeksNumber of sit-to-stand transitions will be measured by 7 days of activPAL 3 device monitoring.
Level of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s Questionnaires8 weeksAcceptability of the Sit Less program will be assessed using satisfaction surveys and exit interviews with Sit Less group participants. The surveys combined items from two questionnaires: Lyons et al., which measured overall program satisfaction (e.g., I would recommend the program), ease of use, and intention to continue using each program component, and Burner et al., which evaluated the text messaging component, including content relevance, motivational impact, frequency, and timing. Satisfaction with the overall program will be evaluated with six items like I would recommend the program and The program is likely to reduce sedentary behavior. All responses will be made on a Likert-type scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores mean higher levels of satisfaction.
Level of Compliance With the Intervention Assessed by Number of Days the Fitbit Device Was Worn8 weeksThe compliance with the intervention will be assessed by number of days the Fitbit device was worn per week.
Changes of Total Daily Sedentary TimeBaseline and 8 weeksTotal daily sedentary time will be measured from 7 days of activPAL 3 device monitoring.
Changes of Prolonged Sedentary TimeBaseline and 8 weeksProlonged sitting time (time spent sitting \>60mins) will be measured by 7 days of activPAL 3 device monitoring.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes of Confidence in Reducing Sedentary Behavior Measured by Using 6 Items From the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.Baseline and 8 weeksConfidence in reducing sedentary behavior will be measured using 6 items from the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior. The items assess the level of confidence for specific sitting behaviors and sedentary breaks. Each item is a likert-type scale, ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Changes of Habit Strength for Sedentary Behavior Assessed by Using the Self-Report Habit Index.Baseline and 8 weeksHabit strength for sedentary behavior will be assessed by 7 items from the Self-Report Sedentary Behavior Habit Index. This measure will evaluate changes in habit strength for sedentary behavior, assessed using the Self-Report Habit Index adapted for sedentary breaks (standing/walking). Habit strength for sedentary behavior will be assessed by using a validated measure, Self-Report Habit Index (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91). This 7- item index was adapted to sedentary breaks (standing/walking) to assess the degree to which sedentary breaks become habitual. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The total score is calculated by taking the mean of the 7 items, which range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating a stronger habit strength for taking sedentary breaks.
Changes of 24-hour Mean Glucose Levels Assessed by Continuous Glucose MonitorsBaseline and 8 weeks24-hour glucose levels will be measured by the use of a continuous glucose monitor over a 7-day period. The 24-hour glucose control will be evaluated by mean 24-hour glucose levels.
Changes of Physical Activity Measured by 7 Days of activPAL Device MonitoringBaseline and 8 weeksPhysical activity will be considered stepping time (minutes), measured by 7 days of activPAL monitoring.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1 - Control
Control Group (n=8) Participants in this group received standard care and did not participate in the Sit Less intervention.
8
Cohort 1 - Intervention
Sit Less Intervention Group (n=5) Participants in this group received the 8-week Sit Less sedentary behavior reduction intervention, which targeted a 120 minute per day reduction in sedentary time using an activity monitor and mHealth tools.
5
Cohort 2 - Intervention
Sit Less Intervention Group (n=15) All participants in Cohort 2 received the modified Sit Less Version 2 sedentary behavior reduction intervention, which was an 8-week program using an activity monitor and mHealth tools to target a reduction in daily sedentary time.
15
Total28

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1 - ControlCohort 1 - InterventionCohort 2 - InterventionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants3 Participants12 Participants20 Participants
Age, Continuous60.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.67
60.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.67
57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.19
BMI31.58 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.98
37.46 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.92
32.25 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.65
33.11 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic Black
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic White
6 Participants4 Participants12 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants4 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants1 Participants7 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 60 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 61 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 60 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Changes of Prolonged Sedentary Time

Prolonged sitting time (time spent sitting \>60mins) will be measured by 7 days of activPAL 3 device monitoring.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Prolonged Sedentary TimeBaseline262.978375 minutesStandard Deviation 167.0212359
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Prolonged Sedentary TimePost-intervention198.121663 minutesStandard Deviation 140.8557184
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Prolonged Sedentary TimeBaseline226.240200 minutesStandard Deviation 97.8064178
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Prolonged Sedentary TimePost-intervention147.582360 minutesStandard Deviation 140.4909207
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Prolonged Sedentary TimeBaseline187.086785 minutesStandard Deviation 110.8965832
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Prolonged Sedentary TimePost-intervention165.056000 minutesStandard Deviation 126.7480441
p-value: 0.6195% CI: [-101.9, 59.5]Regression, Linear
Primary

Changes of Sit-to-stand Transitions

Number of sit-to-stand transitions will be measured by 7 days of activPAL 3 device monitoring.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Sit-to-stand TransitionsBaseline31.25 Sit-to-Stand TransitionsStandard Deviation 12.51
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Sit-to-stand TransitionsPost-intervention32.75 Sit-to-Stand TransitionsStandard Deviation 11.298
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Sit-to-stand TransitionsBaseline42.80 Sit-to-Stand TransitionsStandard Deviation 9.445
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Sit-to-stand TransitionsPost-intervention43.20 Sit-to-Stand TransitionsStandard Deviation 8.167
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Sit-to-stand TransitionsBaseline46.08 Sit-to-Stand TransitionsStandard Deviation 19.448
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Sit-to-stand TransitionsPost-intervention45.31 Sit-to-Stand TransitionsStandard Deviation 15.25
p-value: 0.67495% CI: [-5.68, 8.78]Regression, Linear
Primary

Changes of Total Daily Sedentary Time

Total daily sedentary time will be measured from 7 days of activPAL 3 device monitoring.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Total Daily Sedentary TimeBaseline622.5488 minutesStandard Deviation 86.68241
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Total Daily Sedentary TimePost-intervention554.6351 minutesStandard Deviation 68.21266
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Total Daily Sedentary TimeBaseline670.8750 minutesStandard Deviation 99.19531
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Total Daily Sedentary TimePost-intervention602.8750 minutesStandard Deviation 122.18354
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Total Daily Sedentary TimeBaseline640.7781 minutesStandard Deviation 149.77
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Total Daily Sedentary TimePost-intervention609.5371 minutesStandard Deviation 155.22499
p-value: 0.57895% CI: [-50.68, 90.78]Regression, Linear
Primary

Level of Compliance With the Intervention Assessed by Number of Days the Fitbit Device Was Worn

The compliance with the intervention will be assessed by number of days the Fitbit device was worn per week.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Compliance With the Intervention Assessed by Number of Days the Fitbit Device Was Worn6.58 days per week
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Compliance With the Intervention Assessed by Number of Days the Fitbit Device Was Worn6.13 days per week
Primary

Level of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s Questionnaires

Acceptability of the Sit Less program will be assessed using satisfaction surveys and exit interviews with Sit Less group participants. The surveys combined items from two questionnaires: Lyons et al., which measured overall program satisfaction (e.g., I would recommend the program), ease of use, and intention to continue using each program component, and Burner et al., which evaluated the text messaging component, including content relevance, motivational impact, frequency, and timing. Satisfaction with the overall program will be evaluated with six items like I would recommend the program and The program is likely to reduce sedentary behavior. All responses will be made on a Likert-type scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores mean higher levels of satisfaction.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesText message frequency4 score on a scale
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesI would recommend the program to family and friends.5 score on a scale
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesI enjoyed the sedentary behavior reduction program5 score on a scale
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesThis program is likely to increase awareness of my sedentary behavior5 score on a scale
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesThis program is likely to change attitudes toward my sedentary behavior5 score on a scale
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesThis program is likely to increase intentions/motivation to reduce sedentary behavior4 score on a scale
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesParticipation in this program is likely to reduce sedentary behavior4 score on a scale
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesFitbit satisfaction5 score on a scale
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesSatisfaction on smart water bottle satisfaction4 score on a scale
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesSatisfaction on text message satisfaction4 score on a scale
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesGoal setting was useful5 score on a scale
Cohort 1 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesText message timing4 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesGoal setting was useful4 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesText message frequency4 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesParticipation in this program is likely to reduce sedentary behavior5 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesI would recommend the program to family and friends.4 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesSatisfaction on text message satisfaction3 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesI enjoyed the sedentary behavior reduction program4 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesFitbit satisfaction5 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesThis program is likely to increase awareness of my sedentary behavior5 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesText message timing4 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesThis program is likely to change attitudes toward my sedentary behavior5 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesSatisfaction on smart water bottle satisfaction4 score on a scale
Cohort 2 - InterventionLevel of Satisfaction With the Intervention Assessed by Lyons et al and Burner et al.'s QuestionnairesThis program is likely to increase intentions/motivation to reduce sedentary behavior5 score on a scale
Secondary

Changes of 24-hour Mean Glucose Levels Assessed by Continuous Glucose Monitors

24-hour glucose levels will be measured by the use of a continuous glucose monitor over a 7-day period. The 24-hour glucose control will be evaluated by mean 24-hour glucose levels.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of 24-hour Mean Glucose Levels Assessed by Continuous Glucose MonitorsBaseline120.7143 mg/dLStandard Deviation 21.83052
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of 24-hour Mean Glucose Levels Assessed by Continuous Glucose MonitorsPost-intervention126.0000 mg/dLStandard Deviation 56.60094
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of 24-hour Mean Glucose Levels Assessed by Continuous Glucose MonitorsBaseline135.2500 mg/dLStandard Deviation 29.15905
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of 24-hour Mean Glucose Levels Assessed by Continuous Glucose MonitorsPost-intervention115.7500 mg/dLStandard Deviation 20.51625
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of 24-hour Mean Glucose Levels Assessed by Continuous Glucose MonitorsBaseline129.3846 mg/dLStandard Deviation 28.43278
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of 24-hour Mean Glucose Levels Assessed by Continuous Glucose MonitorsPost-intervention153.5385 mg/dLStandard Deviation 35.08945
p-value: 0.37695% CI: [-68.99, 26.08]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Changes of Confidence in Reducing Sedentary Behavior Measured by Using 6 Items From the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.

Confidence in reducing sedentary behavior will be measured using 6 items from the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior. The items assess the level of confidence for specific sitting behaviors and sedentary breaks. Each item is a likert-type scale, ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Confidence in Reducing Sedentary Behavior Measured by Using 6 Items From the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.Baseline3.9038 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68874
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Confidence in Reducing Sedentary Behavior Measured by Using 6 Items From the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.Post-intervention3.3750 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22474
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Confidence in Reducing Sedentary Behavior Measured by Using 6 Items From the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.Baseline3.7000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83666
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Confidence in Reducing Sedentary Behavior Measured by Using 6 Items From the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.Post-intervention3.8500 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89443
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Confidence in Reducing Sedentary Behavior Measured by Using 6 Items From the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.Baseline3.9038 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6887
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Confidence in Reducing Sedentary Behavior Measured by Using 6 Items From the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.Post-intervention3.3846 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89916
p-value: 0.2995% CI: [-0.335, 1.109]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Changes of Habit Strength for Sedentary Behavior Assessed by Using the Self-Report Habit Index.

Habit strength for sedentary behavior will be assessed by 7 items from the Self-Report Sedentary Behavior Habit Index. This measure will evaluate changes in habit strength for sedentary behavior, assessed using the Self-Report Habit Index adapted for sedentary breaks (standing/walking). Habit strength for sedentary behavior will be assessed by using a validated measure, Self-Report Habit Index (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91). This 7- item index was adapted to sedentary breaks (standing/walking) to assess the degree to which sedentary breaks become habitual. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The total score is calculated by taking the mean of the 7 items, which range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating a stronger habit strength for taking sedentary breaks.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Habit Strength for Sedentary Behavior Assessed by Using the Self-Report Habit Index.Baseline6.2143 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6343
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Habit Strength for Sedentary Behavior Assessed by Using the Self-Report Habit Index.Post-intervention5.8214 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.10327
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Habit Strength for Sedentary Behavior Assessed by Using the Self-Report Habit Index.Baseline6.0857 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18924
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Habit Strength for Sedentary Behavior Assessed by Using the Self-Report Habit Index.Post-intervention5.5143 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24786
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Habit Strength for Sedentary Behavior Assessed by Using the Self-Report Habit Index.Baseline5.2967 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57517
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Habit Strength for Sedentary Behavior Assessed by Using the Self-Report Habit Index.Post-intervention5.8462 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0243
p-value: 0.70195% CI: [-1.24, 0.833]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Changes of Physical Activity Measured by 7 Days of activPAL Device Monitoring

Physical activity will be considered stepping time (minutes), measured by 7 days of activPAL monitoring.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Physical Activity Measured by 7 Days of activPAL Device MonitoringBaseline37.547425 minutesStandard Deviation 19.0937877
Cohort 1 - InterventionChanges of Physical Activity Measured by 7 Days of activPAL Device MonitoringPost-intervention54.1757038 minutesStandard Deviation 29.75937131
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Physical Activity Measured by 7 Days of activPAL Device MonitoringBaseline63.195200 minutesStandard Deviation 18.4359097
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Physical Activity Measured by 7 Days of activPAL Device MonitoringPost-intervention75.4577200 minutesStandard Deviation 60.05685663
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Physical Activity Measured by 7 Days of activPAL Device MonitoringBaseline67.806546 minutesStandard Deviation 18.0175217
Cohort 2 - InterventionChanges of Physical Activity Measured by 7 Days of activPAL Device MonitoringPost-intervention75.1487769 minutesStandard Deviation 24.21793627
p-value: 0.01395% CI: [-38.5, -4.59]Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026