Skip to content

Public's Intended Uptake and Views on Organization of Esophageal Cancer Screening

Dutch Population's Intended Uptake and Views on the Organization of Esophageal Cancer Screening: a Nationwide Survey

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05690958
Acronym
ACCEPT-survey
Enrollment
2088
Registered
2023-01-19
Start date
2023-02-13
Completion date
2023-07-01
Last updated
2023-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Barrett Adenocarcinoma, Barrett Esophagus, Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Brief summary

Rationale: Research on novel methods to screen for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has expanded. Insight into individuals' drivers and barriers to attend screening is essential to tailor a potential new screening policy to their preferences. Public preferences should also be considered on the organizational level to guarantee client-centered decision-making in the design of the screening process. Objective: This study will examine Dutch individuals' intended uptake of EAC screening, including factors that predict uptake, and their views on its organization. Study design: Cross-sectional population-based survey. Study population: Dutch individuals aged 45-75 years. The required sample size is 2088 and 8350 individuals will be invited based on an assumed participation rate of 25%. Methods: Eligible individuals will be selected from the Dutch population registry (BRP) using simple random sampling. Invitations will be sent by postal mail with participants being directed to a digital survey. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome of the study is the intended uptake of EAC screening (strong vs weak). Secondary study endpoints are the perceived need for consultation, perceived need for general education campaigns, acceptability of risk stratification scenarios, and acceptability of using health care resources for EAC screening. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Subjects will not directly benefit from participating in this study. Nonetheless, participating in this study is not associated with any healthcare risks and the burden for the subjects is very low. The survey has a low burdensome nature and will take approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete. All data will be pseudonymized, refusal to fill out the survey or desire to withdraw from the study will not have any consequences for the invited subject.

Interventions

OTHERSurvey

Filling in a survey

Sponsors

ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
CollaboratorOTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 45 to 75 years

Exclusion criteria

* Previous diagnosis of EAC. * Unable to provide informed consent. * Unable to fill out the digital survey.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intended uptake of EAC screeningBaselineParticipants will be informed about BE/EAC screening. Participants will also be informed about using upper endoscopy for this purpose and 1 out of 3 alternative hypothetical screening scenario's (transnasal endoscopy, ingestible cell-collection device, or breath analysis. Subsequently, participants will be asked if they intend to attend upper endoscopy and the alternative test if they were invited.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Views on the organization of EAC screeningBaselineVarious items that are based on qualitative focus group results on the topic

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
EducationBaseline
Current GERD symptoms7 daysReflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ)
Marital statusBaseline
EthnicityBaseline
Previous upper endoscopy experienceBaseline
Personal history of cancerBaseline
AgeBaseline
General cancer worryBaselineLerman's cancer worry scale (CWS)
Perceived risk of EACBaselineItem adapted from HINTS survey
General screening intent and beliefs about cancer screeningBaselineItem adapted from screening module of awareness and beliefs about cancer (ABC) measure
Anticipated discomfort during the screening testBaseline7-point Likert scale
Acceptability of screening test accuracyBaseline7-point Likert scale
Knowing someone affected by esophageal cancerBaseline
GenderBaseline

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactJasmijn D Sijben, drs
jasmijn.sijben@radboudumc.nl+31629061198

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026