Skip to content

Resistance-type Exercise Training in Postmenopausal Women Survivors of Breast Cancer

Comparison of the Effects of Prolonged Resistance-type Exercise Training Between Healthy Postmenopausal Women Versus Postmenopausal Women Survivors of Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05690295
Acronym
MUSCLE-CLIM
Enrollment
26
Registered
2023-01-19
Start date
2023-03-22
Completion date
2024-05-15
Last updated
2024-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer Survivors, Postmenopause, Resistance Training

Keywords

breast cancer, hormone therapy, exercise, muscle mass, strength

Brief summary

Background: In postmenopausal women, an alteration in body composition occurs as a consequence of the secretion of low levels of serum estrogens by the ovaries. Observing an increase in abdominal and mammary fat mass and a decrease in skeletal muscle mass, which is also accompanied by loss of muscle strength and physical function, which leads early to a sarcopenia. On the other hand, the increase in estrogen production by adipose tissue has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer during menopause because the mammary parenchyma is particularly sensitive to this type of estrogen. For this reason, Hormone Therapy (Aromatase Inhibitors and Tamoxifen) is prescribed in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Antineoplastic treatments (Chemotherapy and Hormonal Therapy) have contributed to non-metastatic breast cancer currently presenting a high survival rate, not without adverse effects associated with the course of the disease, age and antineoplastic treatment, affecting various systems, but particularly skeletal muscle mass. Therefore, resistance exercise training has been proposed as an effective intervention strategy to increase muscle mass and strength in different populations. However, the level of muscle response to this type of training in postmenopausal women survivors of breast cancer with and without hormone treatment (Aromatase Inhibitors and Tamoxifen) is unknown.

Detailed description

Hypothesis: The increase in skeletal muscle mass after 12 weeks of progressive resistance-type exercise training is less in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors compared to healthy women of the same age range. Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors without hormonal therapy will have greater gains in skeletal muscle mass compared to breast cancer survivors with Hormone Therapy (Aromatase Inhibitors or Tamoxifen) of the same age range after 12 weeks of progressive resistance-type exercise training. Goals: The primary aim of this study is to compare the effects of a 12-week progressive resistance-type exercise training on muscle mass (whole body muscle mass) in healthy postmenopausal women versus postmenopausal women survivors of breast cancer with and without Hormone Therapy (Aromatase Inhibitors and Tamoxifen). Specific goals Determine whether resistance-type exercise training can increase muscle strength and quality of life in healthy postmenopausal women versus postmenopausal women survivors of breast cancer with and without Hormone Therapy (Aromatase Inhibitors and Tamoxifen). Identify whether circulating biochemical markers are up- or down-regulated in in healthy postmenopausal women versus postmenopausal women survivors of breast cancer with and without Hormone Therapy (Aromatase Inhibitors and Tamoxifen) after resistance-type exercise training Methodology: Study design Twenty-six postmenopausal women between 45 to 59 years will be divided into two groups: participants without cancer (CLIMHEALTHY, n=13) and participants survivors of breast cancer without or with Hormone Therapy (CLIMCANCER, n=13). All volunteers will be subjected to 12 weeks of whole-body resistance-type exercise training (3x/wk). Before, and after 12 weeks of training, whole-body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan will be performed for measured skeletal muscle mass and fasting blood samples will be obtained. Maximal strength will be determined by 1-repetition maximum (1RM), physical functioning by the short physical performance battery (SPPB) and quality of life by QLQ-BR23 at the same time points. Study parameters/endpoints: The main study endpoint is the increase in the skeletal muscle mass of whole-body assessed vial dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Secondary endpoints include: Maximal strength assessment (1RM); Hand grip strength; Short physical performance battery (SPPB); quality of life (QLQ-BR23), Inflammatory and molecular markers (blood samples analysis). Other study parameters include: Age, body weight, body height, body mass index (BMI), lipid profile, glucose, and insulin. Expected results: The impact of resistance-type exercise training to increase muscle mass in postmenopausal women survivors of breast cancer with or without hormonal therapy remains unclear. With the proposed project, the investigators expect that resistance-type exercise training will increase skeletal muscle mass, although the impact will be relatively lower in the participants survivors of breast cancer when compared with a group of healthy postmenopausal woman. The potential findings will define the efficacy of resistance-type exercise training to increase muscle mass in individuals with postmenopausal woman survivors of breast cancer. Better maintenance, or even an increase in muscle mass and strength increases independence, prolonging good health, recovery from disease and illness, and ultimately decreases burden on healthcare systems. These results will allow the creation of local, regional, national and international strategies to combat the adverse effects of breast cancer and its antineoplastic treatment, especially in postmenopausal women.

Interventions

All volunteers will be subjected to 12 weeks of whole-body resistance-type exercise training (3x/wk).

Sponsors

Universidad de La Frontera
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
45 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy postmenopausal women and postmenopausal women survivors of breast cancer with and without Hormonal Therapy (Aromatase Inhibitors and Tamoxifen) between 45 to 59 years. * Women survivors of breast cancer with active Hormone Therapy in the last 12 months. * Women breast cancer survivors with luminal molecular profile and positive estrogen receptors. * Body mass index 18.5 \< BMI \< 30 kg/m2. * Volunteers without cognitive impairment (abbreviated Minimental \>13 points).

Exclusion criteria

* Active antineoplastic treatment in the last 12 months. * \>200 mL of volume difference between upper limbs and/or stage IV breast cancer. * Performing regular resistance training (2 or more times per week, carrying out progressive training) in the previous 6 months. * Cardiovascular diseases that are contradictory for physical activity (not included controlled Hypertension). * All co-morbidities interacting with mobility and muscle metabolism of the body and that do not allow to (safely) perform the resistance-type exercise training (e.g. debilitating arthritis, spasticity/rigidity, all neurological disorders and paralysis).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The changes in skeletal muscle thickness, including measurements for the biceps, triceps brachii, rectus femoris, vastus intermedius, and the total quadriceps, will be assessed using muscular ultrasound after prolonged resistance-type exercise trainingBefore, and after 12 weeks of trainingMeasurements will be in centimeters.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in kilograms of the legs strength measured via 1-Repetition Maximum (1RM) testing) after prolonged resistance-type exercise trainingBefore, and after 12 weeks of trainingMaximal strength assessment via 1RM testing of leg press, and leg extension exercises
Change in kilograms of the hand grip strength measured via JAMAR handheld dynamometer after prolonged resistance-type exercise trainingBefore, and after 12 weeks of trainingMaximal strength assessment via 1RM testing of JAMAR handheld dynamometer
Change in points of the physical performance measured via Short physical performance battery (SPPB) after prolonged resistance-type exercise trainingBefore, and after 12 weeks of trainingMeasurement of physical performance via SPPB, the minimum value is 0 point and the maximum value is 12 points. Higher score in the Physical Performance mean a better outcome and lower score mean a worse outcome
Change in kilograms of the arms strength measured via 1-Repetition Maximum (1RM) testing) after prolonged resistance-type exercise trainingBefore, and after 12 weeks of trainingMaximal strength assessment via 1RM testing of horizontal row, lat pull down and chest press exercises
Change in microgram per milliliter (µg/ml) of Human Insulin via ELISA after prolonged resistance-type exercise trainingBefore, and after 12 weeks of trainingMeasurement in blood samples, the insulin will evaluate by ELISA using the Human Insulin ELISA Kit, following the manufacturer's recommendations
Change in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) of glucose via methods enzymatic-colorimetricBefore, and after 12 weeks of trainingMeasurement in blood samples, the glucose will determined by enzymatic-colorimetric methods using an automatic photometer.
Change in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) of lipid profile via methods enzymatic-colorimetricBefore, and after 12 weeks of trainingMeasurement in blood samples, the lipid profile will determined by enzymatic-colorimetric methods using an automatic photometer
Change in points quality of life measured via questionnaire European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) after prolonged resistance-type exercise trainingBefore, and after 12 weeks of trainingMeasurement of quality of life via EORTC QLQ-30, this questionnaire has 30 question covering functional state and cancer related symptoms. Besides, there are two specific question covering the overall health and overall quality of life. The scores obtained are standardized and a score between 0 and 100 is obtained. High values on the global health and functional status scales indicate a better quality of life. However, high values on the symptom scale indicate a lower quality of life

Countries

Chile

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026