Skip to content

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in the Dutch Population

Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms and Help-seeking Behavior, Medication Use and Esophageal Cancer Awareness: Dutch Population-based Survey

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05689918
Acronym
REFLUX
Enrollment
4719
Registered
2023-01-19
Start date
2022-12-07
Completion date
2023-05-07
Last updated
2023-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastro Esophageal Reflux

Brief summary

Rationale: Screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) precursors and treating them may help to decrease mortality of this malignancy. To understand the size of the target population for potential EAC screening, insight in the prevalence of registered and unregistered individuals with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms is needed. Insight in public awareness of EAC will provide additional useful information for public communication strategies. Objective: The aims of this study are to assess the prevalence of GERD symptoms and related help-seeking behavior, registered and unregistered medication use and awareness of esophageal cancer in the general Dutch population. Study design: Cross-sectional population-based survey. Study population: Dutch citizens aged 18-75 years. Methods: Eligible individuals will be selected from the Dutch population registry (BRP) using simple random sampling. Invitations will be sent by postal mail with participants being directed to a digital survey. Main study parameters/endpoints: The outcome variables are presence of current GERD symptoms, number of GERD patients that consulted a doctor, number of GERD patients using prescribed and/or over the counter (OTC) antacids, histamine-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and awareness and beliefs about esophageal cancer. The association between socio-demographic background and outcome variables will also be evaluated. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Subjects will not directly benefit from participating in this study. Nonetheless, participating in this study is not associated with any healthcare risks and the burden for the subjects is very low. The survey has a low burdensome nature and will take approximately 20 minutes to complete. All data will be pseudonymized, refusal to fill out the survey or desire to withdraw from the study will not have any consequences for the invited subject.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

No intervention

Sponsors

Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 - 75 years

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to provide informed consent for any reason; * Unable to fill out the digital survey for any reason.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of GERD symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation and/or dyspepsia)7 daysThe Dutch translation of the validated Reflux Disease Questionnaire will be used to measure this outcome.
Level of awareness of esophageal cancer risk factors and alarm symptomsBaselineThe awareness and beliefs about cancer (ABC) measure was adapted for this outcome. The alarm symptom module measures whether participants think dysphagia, change in stool pattern, change in appearance of a mole, weightloss and palpable lesions are alarm symptoms of cancer (yes/no/don't know). The risk factor module measures whether participants think alcohol, smoking, obesity, male sex, GERD symptoms, age\>50y, familial esophageal cancer, hot drinks and radiation are risk factors for esophageal cancer on a 4 point scale (strongly disagree - strongly agree).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of individuals that sought help for GERD (general practitioner/referral)20 yearsParticipants with GERD will be asked whether they discussed their symptoms with their GP, whether they have been referred to a gastroenterologist or internist and what their reasons were for seeking help or not seeking help (answer options were based on qualitative research).
Number of individuals with GERD that used antacids, H2RAs and PPI's (prescribed)6 monthsParticipants will be asked to indicate whether they used prescribed Omeprazol, Pantoprazol, Esomeprazol, Lansoprazol, Rabeprazol, Cimetidine, Famotidine, Nizatidine, Ranitidine, Sucralfate, Misoprostol, Antagel, Gastilox, Maalox, Gaviscon, Regla-pH, Rennie, Magnesiumhydroxide, Iberogast or A. Vogel Boldocynara in the past 6 months.
Number of individuals with GERD that used antacids, H2RAs and PPI's (over-the-counter)6 monthsParticipants will be asked to indicate whether they used over-the-counter Omeprazol, Pantoprazol, Esomeprazol, Lansoprazol, Rabeprazol, Cimetidine, Famotidine, Nizatidine, Ranitidine, Sucralfate, Misoprostol, Antagel, Gastilox, Maalox, Gaviscon, Regla-pH, Rennie, Magnesiumhydroxide, Iberogast or A. Vogel Boldocynara in the past 6 months.
Beliefs about esophageal cancerBaselineThe awareness and beliefs about cancer (ABC) measure was adapted for this outcome. The beliefs module measures whether participants think esophageal cancer can be treated, can be cured, is a death sentence, can benefit from early detection and whether they would wish to know about de diagnosis on a 4 point Likerts scale (strongly disagree - strongly agree).

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026