Skip to content

Probability of Optimal Target Attainment of Amikacin in Patients With Febrile Neutropenia During Treatment for a Hematological Disorder

Probability of Optimal Target Attainment of Amikacin in Patients With Febrile Neutropenia During Treatment for a Hematological Disorder: a Prospective, Single-centre Study and PKPD-analysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05689450
Enrollment
92
Registered
2023-01-19
Start date
2022-12-21
Completion date
2024-02-02
Last updated
2024-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Febrile Neutropenia (FN)

Keywords

Amikacin, Hematological disorder, Aminoglycoside (AG), Area under the curve (AUC), Acute kidney injury (AKI), Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PKPD) analysis, Peak serum concentration (Cmax), Trough serum concentration (Cmin), Renal toxicity, Pharmacological target attainment, Amikacin concentration

Brief summary

The present trial is a single center, prospective, observational pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PKPD) cohort study investigating whether patients suffering from a hematological disorder and treated with amikacin due to febrile neutropenia (FN) achieve the predefined amikacin target concentration (Cmax ≥60 mg/L).

Detailed description

Amikacin is an aminoglycoside (AG) that exerts a rapid bactericidal effect against many Gram-negative pathogens. Its pharmacological effect depends on the peak concentration achieved. However, a common side effect of AG is dose-dependent acute kidney injury (AKI), especially when administered over several days due to an accumulation of the drug in the proximal renal tubular cells. In patients in advanced stage of a hematological disease, low body weight influences amikacin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PKPD) and increases its clearance. However, there is little known about amikacin PKPD in patients with febrile neutropenia (FN). Whereas the therapeutic efficacy is associated with the peak concentration of AG, toxicity of AG depends on the area under the curve (AUC) or trough level of the drug. When using the AUC to predict renal toxicity, an AUC between 200 and 300 mg/L \* h of amikacin has been proposed as a potential threshold for renal toxicity. At the University Hospital Basel (USB), amikacin is administered intravenously (iv) as once daily infusion combined with cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam immediately after the occurrence of a fever spike in patients with FN. After the iv administration of amikacin, peak concentration is achieved after 30-60 min. The in-house guidelines recommend the administration of lower amikacin dosages compared to other published studies (15 mg/kg body weight vs. 20 mg/kg or up to 30 mg/kg). It remains unclear if adequate peak concentrations are achieved in patients with FN, when lower amikacin doses are administered. The aim of this study is to investigate the probability of optimal pharmacological target attainment (Cmax ≥60 mg/L) during amikacin treatment among patients with FN treated for hematological disorder in order to evaluate the in-house amikacin dosage recommendations. The current project includes the sampling of biological material during hospital admission and the collection of health-related personal data.

Interventions

OTHERData collection: Amikacin concentration

Blood samples for the measurement of the concentration and calculation of the AUC of amikacin are collected 60 min (+/-30 min) and 8 h (+/-1 h) after the beginning of amikacin infusion. The blood collection after the start of the amikacin infusion will be repeated during every subsequent amikacin administration, but max. during 3 consecutive days.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Informed consent (IC) as documented by signature * Documented hematological disorder * Hospitalization at the USB due to the treatment for a hematological disorder (e.g. chemotherapy, stem cell transplantation) * Being at risk of developing FN during the hospital stay (e.g. because of chemotherapy)

Exclusion criteria

* Previous enrolment into the current study * Outpatients * Patients undergoing hemodialysis * Women who are pregnant (special pharmacokinetic)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pharmacological target attainment (Cmax ≥60 mg/L) in blood during amikacin treatment60 minutes (+/-30 minutes) and 8 hours (+/-1 hour) after the beginning of amikacin infusion on day 1, day 2 and day 3Percentage of patients with optimal pharmacological target attainment (Cmax ≥60 mg/L) in blood during amikacin treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AUC >200 mg/L and AUC >300 mg/L* h during amikacin treatmentUp to 3 days after the beginning of amikacin infusionPercentage of patients achieving the threshold of potential renal toxicity defined as AUC \>200 mg/L and AUC \>300 mg/L\* h respectively during amikacin treatment
Percentage of patients achieving a calculated Cmin <4 mg/L in bloodUp to 3 days after the beginning of amikacin infusionPercentage of patients achieving a calculated Cmin \<4 mg/L in blood during amikacin treatment
Incidence of Acute kidney injury (AKI)Within 7 days after application of amikacinIncidence of AKI
Percentage of patients with optimal pharmacological target attainmentUp to 3 days after the beginning of amikacin infusionPercentage of patients with optimal pharmacological target attainment using a Cmax/minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥8 in patients with an identified causative pathogen
Time interval between the detection of the first fever spike and the administration of amikacinOne time assessment at baseline (Day 1)Time interval between the detection of the first fever spike and the administration of amikacin

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026