Myocardial Infarction
Conditions
Keywords
cardiac rehabilitation, telerehabilitation, myocardial infarction
Brief summary
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of eHealth-based cardiac rehabilitation with the effect of usual care on exercise capacity and qualify of life in patients after myocardial infarction.
Detailed description
Cardiac rehabilitation can improve exercise capacity, life of quality, readmission rate and mortality rate for patients after myocardial infarction. International guidelines list cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction as class IA recommendation. However, low participation rate of cardiac rehabilitation due to barriers such as lacking of time, transport or affordability issues is an unsolved problem worldwide. eHealth, consisting of telemedicine, mobile health and personalized care using wearable devices has the potential to remove the barriers and become an effective model to deliver cardiac rehabilitation. Thus, we design a randomized controlled trial to compare the effect of a case manager-led eHealth-based cardiac rehabilitation program with usual care on the compliance, physical activity, quality of life, and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients after myocardial infarction.
Interventions
OTHEReHealth-based cardiac rehabilitation
The 12-wk case manager-led eHCR program includes: 1. Individualized exercise prescription according to the results of cardiopulmonary exercise test. 2. At least one session of in-person physical therapy to familiarize participants with the process of exercise training before the initiation of telerehabilitation. 3. Telerehabilitation: a 30-minute moderate aerobic exercise training with remote monitoring and instruction using video conferencing. (Frequency: twice per week in the first 4 weeks, once per week in the 5th-8th week, once every 2 weeks in the 9th-12th week) 4. Additional self-exercise to achieve the target volume of 150-minute moderate aerobic exercise and 2 sessions of resistance training per week. 5. Patient education for secondary prevention delivered regularly via a communication app on the smartphone. 6. Weekly follow-up call from a case manager via phone call or communication app.
Sponsors
National Taiwan University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. ≥ 20 years of age. 2. Within 6 months after the onset of acute myocardial infarction. 3. At lowest to moderate risk according to the guideline from American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. 4. Unable or refused to attend center-based cardiac rehabilitation.
Exclusion criteria
1. Unable to walk independently or use a stationary bike. 2. Unable to follow verbal command. 3. Not having a smartphone which can get on the internet. 4. Having contraindications for exercise according to American College of Sports Medicine's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 5. Unable to provide informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of peak oxygen uptake | at baseline, 12 weeks(post-intervention), and 12 months. | Peak oxygen uptake will be assessed using cardiopulmonary exercise test before intervention, at 12 weeks (post-intervention), and at 12 months. |
| Change of ventilatory anaerobic threshold | at baseline, 12 weeks(post-intervention), and 12 months. | Ventilatory anaerobic threshold will be assessed using cardiopulmonary exercise test before intervention, at 12 weeks (post-intervention), and at 12 months. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Depression | at baseline, 12 weeks(post-intervention), and 12 months. | The investigators will assess the change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 score ranges from 0-27. Higher scores indicate worsen symptoms. |
| Anxiety | at baseline, 12 weeks(post-intervention), and 12 months. | The investigators will assess the change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 score ranges 0-21. Higher scores indicate worsen symptoms. |
| Adherence to prescribed exercise | at 12 weeks(post-intervention) and 12 months. | The degree of completion of prescribed exercise will be assessed at 12 weeks and 12 months. |
| Evaluation of grip strength | at baseline, 12 weeks(post-intervention), and 12 months. | The grip strength will be measured using a grip goniometer with the participants seated and the elbow flexed at 90 degrees. |
| Evaluation of isometric knee extension strength | at baseline, 12 weeks(post-intervention), and 12 months. | The isometric knee extension strength will be measured using a dynamometer with participants seated and knee flexed at 90 degrees. |
| Evaluation of physical activity | at baseline, 12 weeks(post-intervention), and 12 months. | The investigators will assess the change in physical activity using Long form International Physical Activity Questionnaire(IPAQ) Taiwan version. |
| Evaluation of Quality of life | at baseline, 12 weeks(post-intervention), and 12 months. | The investigators will assess the change in 36-Item Short Form Survey(SF-36). |
Countries
Taiwan
Contacts
Primary ContactHung-Jui Chuang, MD
Outcome results
None listed