Skip to content

ALT-FLOW II Trial of the Edwards APTURE Transcatheter Shunt System

A Randomized, Sham-controlled Clinical Trial for Evaluation of the Edwards APTURE Transcatheter Shunt System (ALT-FLOW II)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05686317
Acronym
ALT-FLOW II
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-01-17
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2030-08-31
Last updated
2026-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Brief summary

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded (participant and outcomes assessor) clinical trial.

Detailed description

The objectives of this trial are to assess the safety, performance, and effectiveness of the Edwards APTURE transcatheter shunt system when used for the treatment of patients with heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) or mildly reduced (HFmrEF) ejection fraction (LVEF \>40%) who remain symptomatic despite guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT)

Interventions

DEVICEEdwards APTURE transcatheter shunt system

Treatment with APTURE shunt

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSham procedure

CS angiography

Sponsors

Edwards Lifesciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: • Symptomatic heart failure 1. A primary diagnosis of HFmrEF or HFpEF (LVEF \> 40%), and 2. NYHA class II to ambulatory NYHA class IV (IVa), and 3. Documentation of at least one of the following from the date of initial informed consent or date of enrollment: i. Within the prior 12 months, EITHER: * HF hospital admission (with HF as the primary or secondary diagnosis) * Treatment with intravenous (IV) or intensification of oral diuretics for HF ii. Within the prior 6 months, EITHER: * BNP value \> 35 pg/ml in normal sinus rhythm (NSR) or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) * BNP \> 125 pg/ml for permanent or long-term persistent AF * NT-proBNP \> 125 pg/ml in NSR or paroxysmal AF * NT-proBNP \> 375 pg/ml for permanent or long-term persistent AF d. There is objective evidence of cardiogenic pulmonary congestion based on hemodynamic criteria obtained by right heart catheterization (RHC) at exercise, and confirmed by hemodynamics core lab as: As measured at end-expiration, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at ≥ 20 Watts exercise (PCWP ≥ 20W) is elevated to ≥ 25 mmHg and exceeds \[the corresponding\] right atrial pressure (RAP) by ≥ 8 mmHg • In the judgment of the treating physician and the Central Screening Committee the patient is on GDMT for HFpEF/HFmrEF for \>30 days prior to screening and baseline assessments, that is expected to be maintained without change for 6 months. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Severe heart failure defined as one or more of the below: 1. ACC/AHA/ESC Stage D HF, non-ambulatory NYHA Class IV HF 2. If Body Mass Index (BMI) \< 30, cardiac index \< 2.0 L/min/m2 3. If BMI ≥ 30, cardiac index \< 1.8 L/min/m2 4. Inotropic infusion (continuous or intermittent) within the past 6 months 5. Patient is on the cardiac transplant waiting list 6. Prior diagnosis of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), including patients with improvement in LVEF to \> 40% * Valve disease: 1. Degenerative mitral regurgitation \> moderate 2. Functional or secondary mitral valve regurgitation defined as grade \> moderate 3. Mitral stenosis \> mild 4. Primary or secondary tricuspid valve regurgitation defined as grade \> moderate 5. Aortic valve disease defined as aortic regurgitation grade \> moderate or aortic stenosis \> moderate * More than mild right ventricular (RV) dysfunction as determined by the echo core lab, taking into account the following available parameters: 1. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) \<1.4 cm, or 2. RV size ≥ LV size 3. Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) \< 35%; or 4. Imaging or clinical evidence of congestive hepatopathy * Mean right atrial pressure (mRAP) \> 15 mmHg at rest * Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≥ 5.0 WU * BMI ≥ 45 * Myocardial infarction (MI) and/or any therapeutic invasive, non-valvular cardiovascular procedure within past 3 months or current indication for coronary revascularization * Stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolus within the past 6 months * Renal insufficiency as determined by creatinine (sCr) level \> 2.5 mg/dL or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 25ml/min/1.73 m2 by CKD-Epi equation; or currently requiring dialysis * Performance of the six-minute walk test (6MWT) with a distance \< 50m OR \> 450m * Active endocarditis or infection requiring intravenous antibiotics within 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device + Medical Therapy: Subjects with Early Major Adverse Events30 daysShunt implant safety: proportion of patients in the APTURE shunt group without any serious device or procedure-related (CEC adjudicated) complications (i.e., Major Adverse Cardiovascular, Cerebrovascular, and Renal Events \[MACCRE\]; at 30 days post index procedure or hospital discharge, whichever is later.
Mean change in PCWL from baseline at 6 months6-monthsHemodynamic Effectiveness: change in pulmonary capillary wedge during load (PCWL, mmHg/W/kg) from baseline at 6 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
KCCQ-OSS change from baseline at 6-month follow-up6-monthsChange in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS) from baseline at 6-month follow-up.
Proportion of individual patient success defined as being free from death, disabling stroke, and HF hospitalization with at least (≥) a 15-point improvement from baseline KCCQ-OSS or at least (≥) a 25m improvement from baseline 6MWT.6-months
6MWT change from baseline at 6-month follow-up6-monthsChang in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) from baseline at 6-month follow-up

Countries

Brazil, Canada, Germany, Switzerland, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 5, 2026