Skip to content

Needless Laser Injector for Antiaging Effect of Dermal Filler

Needless Laser Injector Versus Needle Injection for Antiaging Effect of Dermal Filler: A Randomized Split-face Comparison

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05685667
Enrollment
24
Registered
2023-01-17
Start date
2021-08-01
Completion date
2022-12-01
Last updated
2023-01-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging Problems

Brief summary

The investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of needless laser injector for antiaging effect of dermal filler.

Detailed description

A 24-week prospective, single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, split-face study was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of needless laser injector versus needle injection for anti-aging effect of dermal filler.

Interventions

DEVICEneedless laser injector (Mirajet)

Mirajet injection was performed 2-3 passes until a total of 2cc of diluted PLA/HA solution was completely injected to the one half of the face.

For traditional method of needle injection, intradermal injection using multi-puncture/micro-papule technique was used. A series of injections at 0.5-1 cm apart was performed on one half of the face so that a total of 2cc of diluted PLA/HA solution was injected.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients who wanted to improve facial skin aging

Exclusion criteria

* a history of skin rejuvenation treatment (including filler, botulinum toxin, lasers, chemical peeling, and topical retinoid) within 6 month prior to the start of the study * having a plan for skin rejuvenation treatment during the study * current pregnancy or breastfeeding * an allergy to polylactic acid (PLA) or hyaluronic acid (HA) * uncontrolled medical diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Skin hydration using a Corneometer® CM 825at 12 weeks after treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skin elasticity using a Cutometer® MPA 580at 12 weeks after treatment
Erythema index (EI) using a Mexameter® MX 18 (Courage & Khazaka)at 12 weeks after treatment
Skin aging analyzed by three-dimensional photogrammetryat 12 weeks after treatment
Patient's satisfaction score for antiaging effectsat 12 weeks after treatmentfrom 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 7 (extremely satisfied)
Patient's pain score during treatmentup to 24 weeksfrom 0 (none) to 10 (worst)
Adverse events related to the procedureup to 24 weeks

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026