Skip to content

Efficacy of Mobilization With Post- Isometric Relaxation in Neck Pain Associated With Myofascial Trigger Points

Efficacy of Cervical Mobilization With Post Isometric Relaxation in Managing Mechanical Neck Pain Associated With Myofascial Trigger Points: a Randomized Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05684809
Enrollment
33
Registered
2023-01-13
Start date
2022-10-30
Completion date
2023-02-15
Last updated
2023-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mechanical Neck Pain

Brief summary

purpose of the study: to determine the effectiveness of cervical mobilization with PIR in reducing pain and improving neck ROM and function in people with mechanical neck pain associated with MTrPs

Detailed description

This study will be based on a randomized controlled design which will be comparative in nature. Participants will be recruited using the convenience sampling method and will be randomly divided into two groups A and B respectively. Thirty participants of mechanical neck pain associated with upper Trapezius trigger point pain will be recruited from the Physiotherapy department, at the Najran University, Saudi Arabia. Study objectives and procedure will be properly explained and written informed consent will be obtained at the beginning of the study. All the participants will be randomly assigned into two equal groups A and B. Group A will be receiving the hot pack, active Stretching, isometric exercise intervention, and PIR technique while group B will receive the hot pack, active Stretching, isometric exercise intervention, and cervical Mobilization.

Interventions

OTHERPost Isometric relaxation Technique (PIR)

In PIR intervention, the patients were requested to lie down in a supine position and their neck was in a lateral flexion to the opposite side so that the target upper Trapezius muscle fibers would be in a lengthened position. The therapist performed a moderate isometric contraction (approximately 75% of maximal) of upper Trapezius muscles, held it for 5 seconds, then relaxed for 3 seconds before moving the cervical spine into the new barrier. In each session, this technique was repeated for four times, on alternate days for three weeks.

OTHERCervical Mobilization (CM)

Cervical Mobilization was delivered in prone lying with their foreheads resting comfortably on his hands, and the chin was tucked in.The treatment session was done on alternate days (3 days a week) for 3 weeks, hence the total number of sessions were 9.

OTHERconventional treatment

Hot Pack was given for twenty minutes, slow sustained stretching exercises ( 20 second hold, 10-second relaxation) were given, and isometric exercise of the neck((10 repetitions of two sets with 10 seconds hold) alternate days for three weeks.

Sponsors

Najran University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age 20-40 years, * having mechanical neck pain located in the neck or scapular regions along with 1-2 MTrPs which, * on palpation replicated their chief complaints in the upper Trapezius muscle (unilateral).

Exclusion criteria

* known cases of fibromyalgia syndrome, * cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy, * history of cervical spine surgery, * congenital or acquired postural deformity, presence of MTrPs in bilateral upper Trapezius muscles, * patients who received any treatment for their pain one month prior to the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity3 WeeksThe pain intensity was assessed Using a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), Its a 11 point scale, where zero indicates no pain and 10 indicates severe pain
Neck Disability Index3 WeeksThe Neck Disability was assessed using a neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire, the minimum value 0- and the maximum value is 50
Range of Motion3 WeeksThe Neck Side Flexion range of motion was assessed using cervical range of motion(CROM) device
Pain Pressure Threshold3 WeeksThe Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) was assessed using an algometer algometer

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026