Skip to content

Impact of Remote Care in Patients Diagnosed With Thromboembolic Disease of Low Risk

Evaluation of Feasibility and Impact of Remote Care in Patients With Thromboembolic Disease of Low Risk

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05684770
Acronym
TEVEDOM
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-01-13
Start date
2025-09-30
Completion date
2028-03-31
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thromboembolic Disease

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the feasibility and impact of remote care in patients diagnosed with thromboembolic disease of low risk. The main questions it aims to answer are: * the evaluation of feasibility of organisation between different healthcare professionals (hospital physicians, primary care physician) at 6 months and 1 year * the evaluation of complication rate, hospitalisation related to thromboembolic disease rate, compliance to treatment rate at 6 months and 1 year Participants will receive indication of treatment according to national recommendations. Additionnally, they will receive for the length of study a 4G tablet in order to fill questionnaires, learn information about their drugs (patient education), have a remote consultation and evaluate treatment compliance.

Interventions

OTHER4G tablet

Participants will receive for the whole period of study a 4G tablet in order to fill questionnaires, learn information about their drugs (patient education), have a remote consultation and evaluate treatment compliance.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Eure-Seine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients identified in the emergency department with a thromboembolic disease, with a deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with a low risk of mortality according to recommendations * affiliated or beneficiary of social protection

Exclusion criteria

* patient having a severe obstruction syndrome, a thromboembolic disease already under treatment or a suspicion of thrombocytopenia induced by heparin * patient with an active hemorrhage or a major risk of hemorrhage, a renal severe failure, comorbidities such as cancer, or the impossibility to organise a consultation or a patient in a non favorable medico-social context * patient with a caval thrombosis * patient suffering of a disease at hemorrhagic risk or neurosurgery intervention done in the last month or other surgery in the last 15 days prior to inclusion * patient with contraindication of direct oral anticoagulants, such as bitherapy with antiplatelet agent, imidazoles, macrolides, antiretroviral treatments or an anti-phospholipid syndrome * patient that lives in an area not covered by internet * patient that has no primary care physician * patient not able to understand the study (language, psychological problem) or not able to read or write * patient under legal protection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants in which the evaluation of medical and patient satisfaction regarding feasibility of organisation assessed by three scales (patient scale, hospital physician scale and primary care physician scale) is satisfactory6 monthsThree scales were created for this study : * patient scale : difficulty perceived to use the tablet, added value in the use of tablet, improvement of communication with physicians * hospital physician scale : global satisfaction (scale from 0 to 10), perception on the follow-up of patient through tablet, improvement of communication with patients and with primary care physician * primary care physician scale : global satisfaction (scale from 0 to 10), perception on the follow-up of patient through tablet, improvement of communication with patients and with hospital physician

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients in which the evaluation of medical and patient satisfaction regarding feasibility of organisation assessed by three scales (patient scale, hospital physician scale and primary care physician scale) is satisfactory1 yearThree scales were created for this study : * patient scale : difficulty perceived to use the tablet, added value in the use of tablet, improvement of communication with physicians * hospital physician scale : global satisfaction (scale from 0 to 10), perception on the follow-up of patient through tablet, improvement of communication with patients and with primary care physician * primary care physician scale : global satisfaction (scale from 0 to 10), perception on the follow-up of patient through tablet, improvement of communication with patients and with hospital physician
Evaluation of complication rate related to thromboembolic disease6 months and 1 year
Evaluation of hospitalisation rate related to thromboembolic disease1 year
Evaluation of treatment compliance6 months and 1 yearThis will be evaluated by the communication between the physician and the patient during consultation

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactLydia BEN BEKKOU, ARC
arc2.circe@ch-eureseine.fr+332 32 33 86 75

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026