Skip to content

Reducing Free Sugar Intakes: A Role for Sweet Taste

Reducing Free Sugar Intakes: A Role for Sweet Taste

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05684757
Enrollment
29
Registered
2023-01-13
Start date
2023-03-01
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dietary Behaviour

Brief summary

This randomised controlled trial aims to assess the effects of three different types of dietary advice for reducing free sugar intakes, on intakes of free sugar, in a sample of the UK population.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this randomised control trial is to assess the effects of three different types of dietary advice, for reducing total energy intakes (TEI) of free sugar. A total of 150 participants (age 18-65years) consuming diets \>5% total energy intake from dietary free sugars will be recruited from across the Dorset region. All participants will be asked to reduce their free sugar intake to \<5% TEI, and to aid with this, they will be encouraged to reduce their intakes of specific foods identified as high in free sugars. Participants will also be advised to replace these foods with other foods dependent on their taste. Participants will be randomized to replace high sugar foods with: 1) foods that are low in sugars, but high in sweet taste; 2) foods that are low in sugars, but high in other tastes; and 3) foods that are low in taste. The primary outcome will be changes in free sugar consumption from baseline to endpoint at week 12. Secondary outcomes include change in: BMI; dietary profiles; sweetness preference; sweetness liking; food choices; low calorie sweetener intakes and adherence levels at week 12.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDietary Advice

Dietary Advice

Sponsors

Bournemouth University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Investigators, outcomes assessors and analysts will be masked. Masking of participants is not possible.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. aged 18-65 years; 2. able to provide consent and complete all study materials; 3. consuming \>5% of TEI from free sugars; 4. residing in the South of England, and able to attend Bournemouth University for testing.

Exclusion criteria

1. individuals who are pregnant or breastfeeding; 2. underweight (BMI \<18.5); 3. have pre-existing clinical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, eating disorders, Crohn's disease and other illness's leading to participants receiving external nutritional advice and dietary restrictions; 4. have pre-existing medical conditions affecting swallow ability, taste and smell perception; 5. currently following a specific dietary programme (e.g.: Slimming World); 6. current smokers or have smoked within 3 months of the study start date.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Free sugar intakesBaseline to week 12Percentage energy intake from free sugars, assessed using diet diaries
AdherenceBaseline to week 12Adherence to the recommendations provided, assessed using diet diaries and self-reported adherence

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dietary IntakesBaseline to week 12Nutrient composition and taste of dietary intakes, assessed using diet diaries
Body weightBaseline to week 12Body weight, in kg, assessed using researcher measurements
BMIBaseline to week 12BMI, in kg/m2, assessed using researcher measurements
Waist circumferenceBaseline to week 12Waist circumference, in cm, assessed using researcher measurements
Body fat percentageBaseline to week 12Body fat percentage, assessed using bioimpedence, as conducted by the researcher measurements
Sweet food preferencesBaseline to week 12Preferences for various sweet foods/fluids, assessed using a taste test, where participants sample several sweet and non-sweet foods and rate them for pleasantness on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale. Higher scores signify stronger preferences
Sweet food perceptionsBaseline to week 12Perceptions of the strength of sweet taste for various sweet foods/fluids, assessed using a taste test, where participants sample several sweet and non-sweet foods and rate them for strength of taste on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale. Higher scores signify stronger perceptions
Sweet food intakesBaseline to week 12Selection of sweet foods/fluids at a given meal, assessed where participants can consume freely from a meal composed of sweet and non-sweet foods, and proportion of sweet foods consumed is measured in terms of weight consumed
Sweet food attitudesBaseline to week 12Attitudes towards sugar, sweeteners, and sweet-tasting foods, assessed using a questionnaire, soon to be published. Higher scores denote stronger attitudes.
Adverse eventsBaseline to week 12Adverse events, assessed by self-report
Eating-based attitudesBaseline to week 12Attitudes towards eating, assessed using the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (Karlsson J, et al. IJO 2000; 24: 1715-1725)
Subjective Quality of LifeBaseline to week 12Quality of Life, measured using the SF-36 questionnaire (Ware et al, 1996), where Quality of Life is assessed out of 100, where a higher score demonstrates better quality of life
Barriers and facilitators to successWeek 12An assessment of barriers and facilitators to success, assessed by self-report questionnaire

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKatherine M Appleton

Bournemouth University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 30, 2026