Skip to content

Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) in CARDiac Surgery.

Validation of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score in Cardiac Surgery: The PROCARDS Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05684354
Acronym
PRO-CARDS
Enrollment
156
Registered
2023-01-13
Start date
2022-07-27
Completion date
2022-12-20
Last updated
2023-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Surgery

Keywords

cardiac, surgery, postoperative care

Brief summary

The use of Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in anaesthesia provides a measure of the patient's quality of postoperative recovery based on his/her own experience. The Quality-Of-Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a widely used questionnaire which has never been validated in cardiac surgery patients. This study aimed at validating the French version of the QoR-15 scale in a cohort of cardiac surgical patients. The QoR-15 scale would have similar psychometric properties and interpretability in assessing postoperative recovery in this population than in general surgery patients.

Detailed description

The French version of the QoR-15 scale as validated by Demumieux et al was used in this study. Eligible patients were given oral and written information the day before or the morning before surgery. After patient agreed to participate, the first QoR-15 scale was distributed by one of the investigators. The patient filled in the questionnaire alone or could be helped by one of the investigators in case of questions or difficulties. The second QoR-15 scale was distributed the day before or the day of discharge from the hospital and at the same time the patient was asked to rate his global recovery on a visual analog scale (VAS) graduated from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst recovery and 100 the best recovery. Patient demographic characteristics were collected including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, preoperative status of diabetes, hypertension, smoking status. Following perioperative data were recorded: type of surgery, duration of CPB, need for cardiac pacing or dobutamine support at the end of surgery, number of pleural and mediastinal chest tubes. Postoperative complications were also recorded: surgical revision, atrial fibrillation requiring antiarrhythmic medication or anticoagulation, pulmonary oedema requiring depletion, drained pleural effusion, drained pneumothorax, radiological atelectasis, radiologic pneumonia, stroke with radiological diagnosis, sepsis as defined by Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock \[Sepsis-3\], Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) documented by Serotonin release assay test. Total dose of morphine used in ICU, length of stay (LOS) in ICU and hospital, duration of surgical drains and mortality at day 28 were also assessed. Statistical analysis Sample size was The sample size was estimated at 150 patients and based on previous published studies(7,8) and guidelines recommending at least 10 subjects per item on the instrument scale(15). Data were reported as mean, median (inter-quartile range), or number (percentage) as appropriate. Correlations were calculated with Pearson correlation coefficient for Gaussian data or with Spearman correlation coefficient for non-Gaussian data. Factors associated with the QOR-15 score were searched by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for qualitative parameters and by linear regression for quantitative parameters. The null hypothesis was rejected if two-tailed P-value was inferior to 0.05

Interventions

The day before or the morning before surgery, the patient filled the first QoR-15 scale alone or could be helped by one of the investigators in case of questions or difficulties. The second QoR-15 scale was distributed the day before or the day of discharge from the hospital

Sponsors

Rennes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 18 years old * Hospitalized for planned cardiac surgery among: coronary artery bypass grafting, valve plasty, valve replacement or ascending aortic surgery * Patient not opposing his participation in the research Non-inclusion criteria: * Adults subject to legal protection (safeguard of justice, curatorship, guardianship) * Persons deprived of liberty * Patient unable to complete the questionnaire independently (cognitive deficit or patient who does not speak French) * Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess the validity of QoR-15 in the post-operative period of cardiac surgeryDay 5Validity (the accuracy of a scale - does the QoR-15 measure what is intended: the quality of postoperative recovery). Convergent validity was tested by the hypothesis that there would be a positive correlation between the postoperative QoR-15 score and the global recovery assessment by the patient, or between the QoR-15 (postoperative-preoperative QoR-15 scores) and the global recovery assessment. Construct validity was tested by the hypothesis that there would be a negative association between the QoR-15 score and various known determinants of postoperative recovery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess the Reliability of QoR-15 in the post-operative period of cardiac surgeryDay 5Reliability (the consistency of a scale) was tested by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha)
Assess the Responsiveness of QoR-15 in the post-operative period of cardiac surgeryDay 5Responsiveness (ability of a scale to detect clinically important change) was assessed by Cohen size effect and standardized response mean.
Assess the Feasibility of QoR-15 in the post-operative period of cardiac surgeryDay 5Feasibility (applicability of a scale in practice) was evaluated by the successful completion rate

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026