Skip to content

Intermittent Caloric Restriction in Patients With Mild to Moderate Crohn's Disease

Intermittent Caloric Restriction in Patients With Mild to Moderate Crohn's Disease: A Randomized, Open-label, Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05683730
Acronym
TONIC
Enrollment
174
Registered
2023-01-13
Start date
2023-04-18
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2023-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn's Disease

Keywords

intermittent caloric restriction, Crohn's disease

Brief summary

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. CD is a common inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), frequent (150,000 patients in France and 1.5 million in Europe), disabling and incurable. The environmental factors, and in particular diet, play a major role in the pathogenesis of CD. The prevalence of CD is steadily increasing in highly industrialized countries, where the Western diet rich in saturated fats and refined sugars, is blamed for this to explain this true pandemic. On the other hand, enteral nutrition, exclusive or partial, is known to be effective in the initial treatment of CD, especially in pediatrics. There are a number of evidence in favor of a nutritional management nutritional management of caloric restriction during inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis,whose physiopathology is similar to that of IBD. To date, and despite patient concern, there is no consensus nutritional in the management of CD to influence the natural course of the disease. The investigators have decided to initiate a clinical study to evaluate for the first time the efficacy, acceptability and safety of intermittent caloric restriction in patients with CD.

Interventions

Intermittente caloric restriction: 1. st month: restriction of 50% of the caloric intake previously determined by the dietician 1 day per week 2. nd month: restriction of 50% of the caloric intake 2 days per week 3. rd month: restriction of 60% of the caloric intake 2 days per week 4. th month: restriction of 75% of the caloric intake 2 days per week

Sponsors

Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between 18 to 65 years old * Established diagnosis of Crohn's disease with a minimum disease duration of 3 months * Patient with mild to moderate Crohn's disease defined by a fecal calprotectin ≥ 250 μg/g and a CDAI score between 150 to 300 * Medical treatment of Crohn's disease stable for at least 3 months * Patient compliant with an intermittent caloric restriction during 16 weeks * Person affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security plan * Person informed about study organization and having signed the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with a BMI \< 18.5kg/m2 * Patient having a weight loss of 5% the first month and 10% during the first 6 months * Patient with active ano-perineal lesions * Patient with an ostomy * Patient with eating disorders (anorexia, bulimia) * Person referred in articles L.1121-5, L. 1121-7 and L.1121-8 of the Public Health Code: * Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman * Minor person (non-emancipated) * Adult person under legal protection (any form of public guardianship) * Adult person incapable of giving consent and not under legal protection * Person deprived of liberty for judicial or administrative decision, person under psychiatric care as referred in articles L. 3212-1 and L. 3213-1.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intestinal inflammationweek 16Evaluate the effectiveness of personalized nutritional management of intermittent caloric restriction during 16 weeks on the level of intestinal inflammation (induction of of a biological response) in patients with mild to moderate CD mild to moderate. The effectiveness will be evaluated in each group by a biological response change, that is to say a decrease at least 50% of calprotectin fecal level.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improving quality of lifeweek 16Evaluated by short-Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (short-IBDQ) short-IBDQ is a 10-items measure that assesses self-reported quality of life. Total score ranges from 10 to 70. Higher the score is better life quality is.
Improving work productivityweek 16Evaluated by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) WPAI questions measure the effect of patients health problems (any physical or emotional problem or symptom) on their ability to work and perform regular activites.
Induction of a clinical responseweek 16Evaluate the impact of personalized nutritional management of intermittent caloric restriction during 16 weeks on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) that is to say change by al least 100 points. The following cut-offs correlate with level of disease activity: Non-active disease: CDAI \< 150 Mild disease activity: CDAI \>= 150 and \<220 Moderate disease activity: CDAI \>= 220 and \<450 Severe disease activity: CDAI \> 450
Induction of a clinical remissionweek 16Evaluate the impact of personalized nutritional management of intermittent caloric restriction during 16 weeks on clinical remission, that is to say Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) \< 150 The following cut-offs correlate with level of disease activity: Non-active disease: CDAI \< 150 Mild disease activity: CDAI \>= 150 and \<220 Moderate disease activity: CDAI \>= 220 and \<450 Severe disease activity: CDAI \> 450
Induction of a biological remissionweek 16Evaluate the impact of personalized nutritional management of intermittent caloric restriction during 16 weeks on biological remission that is to say fecal calprotection \< 250 µg/g
Induction of a radiological responseweek 16Evaluate the impact of personalized nutritional management of intermittent caloric restriction during 16 weeks on radiological response that is to say change of 50% of Nancy score measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Total MRI score: 0 at 36
Improving fatigueweek 16Evaluated by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) FACIT-F is a 40-items measure that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function.
Improving anxiety disorderweek 16Evaluated by Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) The following cut-offs correlate with level of anxiety severity: Score 0-4: Minimal Anxiety Score 5-9: Mild Anxiety Score 10-14: Moderate Anxiety Score greater than 15: Severe Anxiety
Evaluate the safety of intermittent caloric restriction in patients with mild to moderate with mild to moderate CD.weeks 4;8;12 and 16Percentage of adverse event related to intermittent caloric restriction (fatigue; nausea; headache, dizziness, hypotension, irritability, capacity reduced to concentrating, undernutrition/sarcopenia)
Evaluate compliance of intermittent caloric restriction during 16 weeks in patients with with mild to moderate CD.week 16Percentage of patient compliance measured by for example a intermittent caloric restriction during at least 21 days on the 16 weeks of the study
Determine the level of patient satisfaction with intermittent caloric restrictionweek 16Evaluated by Likert scale at 4 items ad-hoc 4 point likert scale for the frequency; assign each response a point value from 1 to 4.
Estimate, in the experimental arm, the prevalence of compensatory hyperphagia after intermittent caloric restriction48 hours after intermittent caloric restrictionPercentage of patients having a compensatory hyperphagia after 2 days of intermittent caloric restriction.
Improving functional disabilityweek 16Evaluated by Inflammatory Bowel Disease - Disability Index (IBD-DI) IBD-DI is a 14-items measure that assesses self-reported disability. It ranges from 0-100: 0-20 (no disability), 20-35 (mild disability), 35-50 (moderate disability) and 50-100 (severe disability)

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactCARON Bénédicte, MD
b.caron@chru-nancy.fr0383155580
Backup ContactLudivine ODOUL, CPM
l.odoul@chru-nancy.fr0383155580

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026