Skip to content

A Confirmatory Trial of ETC-1002 in Patients With Hyper-LDL Cholesterolemia

A Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Parallel-group Trial to Confirm the Superiority of ETC-1002 in Patients With Hyper-LDL Cholesterolemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05683340
Enrollment
96
Registered
2023-01-13
Start date
2023-02-13
Completion date
2024-03-12
Last updated
2025-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyper-low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterolemia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to confirm the superiority of ETC-1002 after 12 weeks of administration at 180 mg/day to placebo in patients with hyper-LDL cholesterolemia who have inadequate control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL C).

Interventions

180mg, tablet, once daily, for 12 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

placebo, tablet, once daily, for 12 weeks

Sponsors

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with inadequate response to statins or statin intolerance as defined below \[Inadequate response to statins\] Patients with hyper-LDL cholesterolemia who have been taking statins\[and other lipid-modifying therapies(LMTs) if needed\] and cannot achieve the lipid management goals of LDL-C \[Statin intolerance\] Patients with hyper-LDL cholesterolemia for whom safety problems have occurred while taking at least one type of statin, and who experienced resolution of the problems after discontinuation or dose reduction, and who cannot achieve the lipid management goals of LDL-C. Patients must be on the lowest or under the dosage of the approved dose of statin and/or on stable LMT(s). * Patients with fasting TG levels of \<400 mg/dL at screening * Other protocol specific inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion criteria

* Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding or who have a positive pregnancy test (urine) result at screening or baseline visits * Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) * Patients who currently have or who have had within the past 3 months prior to screening any cardiovascular diseases, or those who have developed any cardiovascular diseases during the screening or before baseline visit * Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as sitting systolic blood pressure after resting 5 minutes of ≥160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of ≥100 mmHg at screening * Patients with uncontrolled and serious hematologic or coagulation disorders or with hemoglobin of \<10.0 g/dL at screening * Patients with uncontrolled diabetes with HbA1c of ≥9% at screening * Patients with uncontrolled hypothyroidism with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) of \>1.5 × ULN at screening * Patients with liver disease or dysfunction, including: * Positive serology for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or a positive hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody test at screening * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) of ≥3 × ULN or total bilirubin of ≥2 × ULN at screening * Patients with creatine kinase (CK) of \>3 × ULN at screening * Patients with a history or current renal dysfunction, nephritic syndrome, or nephritis, and with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at screening * Other protocol specific

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Week 12Baseline, week12Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Day 1.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12Baseline, week12Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 12Baseline, week12Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.
Percent Change in Non-HDL Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12Baseline, week12Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.
Percent Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to Week 12Baseline, week12Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.
Proportion of Subjects Whose LDL-C Value Achieved the Lipid Management Goals Based on Risk Assessment at Week 12Baseline, week12The proportion of subjects whose LDL-C value achieves the lipid management goal at Week 12.
Percent Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein From Baseline to Week 12Baseline, week12Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ETC-1002 180 mg
ETC-1002 180 mg tablet once daily for 12 weeks.
48
Placebo
Placebo tablet once daily for 12 weeks.
48
Total96

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicETC-1002 180 mgTotalPlacebo
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
28 Participants51 Participants23 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants45 Participants25 Participants
Age, Continuous64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.02
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.93
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.98
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Japanese
48 Participants96 Participants48 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
48 participants96 participants48 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants51 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants45 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 480 / 48
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 486 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 480 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Week 12

Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Day 1.

Time frame: Baseline, week12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) will include all subjects who receive at least one dose of IMP during the treatment period and for whom LDL-C values at baseline and at least one post-dose are observed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ETC-1002 180 mgPercent Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Week 12-25.25 Percent ChangeStandard Error 1.864
PlaceboPercent Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Week 12-3.46 Percent ChangeStandard Error 1.901
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-26.71, -16.85]MMRM
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 12

Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, week12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ETC-1002 180 mgPercent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 12-18.10 Percent ChangeStandard Error 1.762
PlaceboPercent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 12-0.67 Percent ChangeStandard Error 1.799
Secondary

Percent Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to Week 12

Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, week12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ETC-1002 180 mgPercent Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to Week 12-0.87 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.59
PlaceboPercent Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to Week 120.16 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.594
Secondary

Percent Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein From Baseline to Week 12

Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, week12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ETC-1002 180 mgPercent Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein From Baseline to Week 1215.40 Percent ChangeStandard Error 65.246
PlaceboPercent Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein From Baseline to Week 12119.60 Percent ChangeStandard Error 66.542
Secondary

Percent Change in Non-HDL Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12

Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, week12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ETC-1002 180 mgPercent Change in Non-HDL Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12-20.33 Percent ChangeStandard Error 1.704
PlaceboPercent Change in Non-HDL Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12-2.76 Percent ChangeStandard Error 1.72
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12

Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, week12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ETC-1002 180 mgPercent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12-16.36 Percent ChangeStandard Error 1.405
PlaceboPercent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12-2.23 Percent ChangeStandard Error 1.409
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Whose LDL-C Value Achieved the Lipid Management Goals Based on Risk Assessment at Week 12

The proportion of subjects whose LDL-C value achieves the lipid management goal at Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline, week12

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ETC-1002 180 mgProportion of Subjects Whose LDL-C Value Achieved the Lipid Management Goals Based on Risk Assessment at Week 1230 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Whose LDL-C Value Achieved the Lipid Management Goals Based on Risk Assessment at Week 124 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026