Hyper-low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterolemia
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to confirm the superiority of ETC-1002 after 12 weeks of administration at 180 mg/day to placebo in patients with hyper-LDL cholesterolemia who have inadequate control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL C).
Interventions
180mg, tablet, once daily, for 12 weeks
placebo, tablet, once daily, for 12 weeks
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with inadequate response to statins or statin intolerance as defined below \[Inadequate response to statins\] Patients with hyper-LDL cholesterolemia who have been taking statins\[and other lipid-modifying therapies(LMTs) if needed\] and cannot achieve the lipid management goals of LDL-C \[Statin intolerance\] Patients with hyper-LDL cholesterolemia for whom safety problems have occurred while taking at least one type of statin, and who experienced resolution of the problems after discontinuation or dose reduction, and who cannot achieve the lipid management goals of LDL-C. Patients must be on the lowest or under the dosage of the approved dose of statin and/or on stable LMT(s). * Patients with fasting TG levels of \<400 mg/dL at screening * Other protocol specific inclusion criteria may apply
Exclusion criteria
* Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding or who have a positive pregnancy test (urine) result at screening or baseline visits * Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) * Patients who currently have or who have had within the past 3 months prior to screening any cardiovascular diseases, or those who have developed any cardiovascular diseases during the screening or before baseline visit * Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as sitting systolic blood pressure after resting 5 minutes of ≥160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of ≥100 mmHg at screening * Patients with uncontrolled and serious hematologic or coagulation disorders or with hemoglobin of \<10.0 g/dL at screening * Patients with uncontrolled diabetes with HbA1c of ≥9% at screening * Patients with uncontrolled hypothyroidism with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) of \>1.5 × ULN at screening * Patients with liver disease or dysfunction, including: * Positive serology for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or a positive hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody test at screening * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) of ≥3 × ULN or total bilirubin of ≥2 × ULN at screening * Patients with creatine kinase (CK) of \>3 × ULN at screening * Patients with a history or current renal dysfunction, nephritic syndrome, or nephritis, and with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at screening * Other protocol specific
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline, week12 | Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Day 1. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline, week12 | Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. |
| Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline, week12 | Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. |
| Percent Change in Non-HDL Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline, week12 | Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. |
| Percent Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline, week12 | Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. |
| Proportion of Subjects Whose LDL-C Value Achieved the Lipid Management Goals Based on Risk Assessment at Week 12 | Baseline, week12 | The proportion of subjects whose LDL-C value achieves the lipid management goal at Week 12. |
| Percent Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline, week12 | Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. |
Countries
Japan
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| ETC-1002 180 mg ETC-1002 180 mg tablet once daily for 12 weeks. | 48 |
| Placebo Placebo tablet once daily for 12 weeks. | 48 |
| Total | 96 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | ETC-1002 180 mg | Total | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 28 Participants | 51 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 20 Participants | 45 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 64.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.02 | 64.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.93 | 63.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.98 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Japanese | 48 Participants | 96 Participants | 48 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 48 participants | 96 participants | 48 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 28 Participants | 51 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 20 Participants | 45 Participants | 25 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 48 | 0 / 48 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 13 / 48 | 6 / 48 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 48 | 0 / 48 |
Outcome results
Percent Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Week 12
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values from Week -1 and Day 1.
Time frame: Baseline, week12
Population: The full analysis set (FAS) will include all subjects who receive at least one dose of IMP during the treatment period and for whom LDL-C values at baseline and at least one post-dose are observed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETC-1002 180 mg | Percent Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Week 12 | -25.25 Percent Change | Standard Error 1.864 |
| Placebo | Percent Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Week 12 | -3.46 Percent Change | Standard Error 1.901 |
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 12
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.
Time frame: Baseline, week12
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETC-1002 180 mg | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 12 | -18.10 Percent Change | Standard Error 1.762 |
| Placebo | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Week 12 | -0.67 Percent Change | Standard Error 1.799 |
Percent Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to Week 12
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.
Time frame: Baseline, week12
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETC-1002 180 mg | Percent Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to Week 12 | -0.87 Percent Change | Standard Error 0.59 |
| Placebo | Percent Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to Week 12 | 0.16 Percent Change | Standard Error 0.594 |
Percent Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein From Baseline to Week 12
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.
Time frame: Baseline, week12
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETC-1002 180 mg | Percent Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein From Baseline to Week 12 | 15.40 Percent Change | Standard Error 65.246 |
| Placebo | Percent Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein From Baseline to Week 12 | 119.60 Percent Change | Standard Error 66.542 |
Percent Change in Non-HDL Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.
Time frame: Baseline, week12
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETC-1002 180 mg | Percent Change in Non-HDL Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12 | -20.33 Percent Change | Standard Error 1.704 |
| Placebo | Percent Change in Non-HDL Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12 | -2.76 Percent Change | Standard Error 1.72 |
Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] divided by the Baseline value) x 100.
Time frame: Baseline, week12
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETC-1002 180 mg | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12 | -16.36 Percent Change | Standard Error 1.405 |
| Placebo | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 12 | -2.23 Percent Change | Standard Error 1.409 |
Proportion of Subjects Whose LDL-C Value Achieved the Lipid Management Goals Based on Risk Assessment at Week 12
The proportion of subjects whose LDL-C value achieves the lipid management goal at Week 12.
Time frame: Baseline, week12
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| ETC-1002 180 mg | Proportion of Subjects Whose LDL-C Value Achieved the Lipid Management Goals Based on Risk Assessment at Week 12 | 30 Participants |
| Placebo | Proportion of Subjects Whose LDL-C Value Achieved the Lipid Management Goals Based on Risk Assessment at Week 12 | 4 Participants |