Skip to content

The Effectiveness of Lymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery

The Effectiveness of Lymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery for Primary Lymphedema Prevention After Breast Cancer Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: a Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05682885
Acronym
ELYBS
Enrollment
140
Registered
2023-01-12
Start date
2022-10-06
Completion date
2027-11-18
Last updated
2025-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema, Lymphedema Arm

Keywords

Lymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery, Primary Lymphedema Prevention, Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Brief summary

This study evaluate the effectiveness of lymphatic bypass supermicrosurgery (LBS) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) compare to ALND alone to prevent breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL).

Detailed description

In the intervention group, LBS was performed after ALND with the intima-to-intima coaptation using the supermicrosurgery technique. The anastomosis is done between the afferent lymphatic vessel to the recipient's vein, or if possible, from the afferent to the efferent lymphatic vessel. The upper extremity lymphedema (UEL) index and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography are utilized to evaluate the development of lymphedema.

Interventions

PROCEDURELymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery

Axillary Lymph Node Dissection with Lymphatic Bypass Supermicrosurgery

Sponsors

Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Blinding is implemented in two conditions: the main researcher (Bayu Brahma) will not know the identity and medical history of the patient when assessing the indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography results and the patients will not know the received type of surgical procedure.

Intervention model description

This study is a single-blind pragmatic parallel arm randomized clinical trial to analyze the effectiveness of lymphatic bypass supermicrosurgery (LBS).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Breast cancer patient aged \>18 years old * Breast cancer patient with clinically ALNs metastases (cN1 or cN2). * Breast cancer patient with no clinical metastasis and tumor size ≥5cm or no sentinel lymph node biopsy facility in the hospital. * Any breast cancer patients that receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Exclusion criteria

* Stage IV breast cancer patients who do not show clinical and radiological improvement after primary systemic therapy. * Breast cancer patients with previous surgeries such as mastectomy, axillary lymph node biopsy, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and ALND. * Breast cancer patients with prior breast, chest wall, axillary, or neck radiotherapy. * Breast cancer patients with preoperative lymphatic system abnormality detected by ICG lymphography. * Breast cancer patients with iodine allergy, asthma, decreased kidney function, pregnancy, and lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative incidence of BCRL1 yearBCRL definition: Post operation subject condition with presence of minimum DB 2 with one or both symptoms (swelling, heaviness), and increment of UEL index \>10% compared to pre operation OR Post operation subject condition with presence of ≥ DB 2 with minimum area 30% in one arm region in one of the arm lymphatic pathway (anterior or posterior), without presence of symptoms (swelling or heaviness), and increment of UEL index \>10% compared to pre operation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BCRL and SCL progression-free survival rate1 yearPercentage of subjects who do not progress to subclinical lymphedema or lymphedema during the research.
Collateral lymphatic pathway1 yearThe number of lymphatic pathways flow into the region: supraclavicular, internal mammary, and contralateral axillary and supraclavicular nodes based on the ICG lymphography.
Quality of life lymphedema1 yearAssessment of lymphedema quality of life score after the surgery using the lymphedema quality of life score questionnaire that is self-reported by the subjects every 2 months and every 3 months in the second year. Calculation of the lymphedema quality of life score is the summation of the score from each question. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. A higher score indicates lower lymphedema quality of life.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Association of body mass index (BMI) with BCRL1 yearBMI was calculated by weight (kilograms) and height (centimeters). Categorized based on Asia Pacific classification are overweight (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m\^2) and no overweight (BMI \< 23 kg/m\^2). Measured at one time point.
Association of axillary fat weight with BCRL1 yearAxillary fat weight in grams is taken at the time of surgery. Measured at one time point.
Association of number of axillary lymph nodes metastases with BCRL1 yearThe number of metastases lymph nodes and classified into \>3 lymph nodes and ≤3 lymph nodes. Measured at one time point.
Association of number of taxane chemotherapy with BCRL1 yearTaxane chemotherapy data from the subject's medical record and categorized into yes or no. Measured at one time point.
Association of regional lymph node radiation with BCRL1 yearRegional lymph node radiation data from the subject's medical record and categorized into yes or no. Measured at one time point

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026