Skip to content

Speed-based and Mechanical Work Considered HIIT for Football Referees

Effects of Speed-based and Mechanical Work Considered HIIT on Physical and Physiological Performance of Chinese Elite Female Referees in Fitness Tests

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05682430
Enrollment
44
Registered
2023-01-12
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2023-07-15
Last updated
2023-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Fitness

Keywords

high speed interval running, mechanical work

Brief summary

Majority of the existing studies on the high intensity training of referees are heart rate-based prescription. It is probably the most commonly measured physiological marker used to control or measure exercise intensity in the field.Indeed, speed-based intensity training is more acute than heart rate-based training on the intensity of physical work performed above v/pVO2max. This study the setting of exercise intensity reference the ending velocity of the 30-15 intermittent fitness test.

Detailed description

This study was carried out during the 10 weeks of before the seminar which conducted before the season. The assessments were carried out pre and post training intervention in the before and after week of the intervention, it includes 30-15 intermittent fitness test(VIFT),dynamic Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test, 40m repeat speed ability test, change direction test and cooper test.The experimental group(EG) take 10 weeks Speed-based (VIFT) HIIT protocol performed on each Wednesday and Saturday, 60 min for each session. One EG with mechanical work combined in the HIIT exercises, and another EG is not. The control group during the study performed on the same occasion heart rate-based HIIT. The TL was assessed using the 0-10-point rating perceived exertion (RPE) scale according to the procedures. With the aim to obtain more detailed information especially the muscle strain, during each occasion (i.e., training session or match) the referees should provide differentiated RPE (dRPE) for respiratory (RPEres) and leg muscle (RPEmus) exertion perception.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHeart rate based HIIT

Week1,90% HRmax long duration HIIT + 90% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week2,90% HRmax long duration HIIT + 90% long duration HRmax HIIT. Week3,90% HRmax long duration HIIT + 90% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week4,90% HRmax long duration HIIT + 90% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week5,90% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week6,90% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week7,90% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week8,90% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax long duration HIIT. Week9,90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT. Week10,90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT. Week11,90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT. Week12,90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT + 90~95% HRmax short duration HIIT.

BEHAVIORALVIFT speed-based HIIT with mechanical work

Week1,Wednesday 65% VIFT HIIT, saturday 65% VIFT HIIT. Week2,Wednesday 65% VIFT HIIT, saturday 65% VIFT HIIT. Week3,Wednesday 67.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 67.5% VIFT HIIT. Week4,Wednesday 67.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 67.5% VIFT HIIT. Week5,Wednesday 70% VIFT HIIT, saturday 90% VIFT HIIT. Week6,Wednesday 70% VIFT HIIT, saturday 90% VIFT HIIT. Week7,Wednesday 72.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 92.5% VIFT HIIT. Week8,Wednesday 72.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 92.5% VIFT HIIT. Week9,Wednesday 92.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 100% VIFT HIIT. Week10,Wednesday 92.5% VIFT HIIT, saturday 100% VIFT HIIT. Week11,Wednesday 95% VIFT HIIT, saturday 105% VIFT HIIT. Week12,Wednesday 95% VIFT HIIT, saturday 105% VIFT HIIT.

Sponsors

Universiti Putra Malaysia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

In this experiment, the experimental groups conduct the speed-based HIIT with mechanical work. In contrast, the control group take heart rate based HIIT.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
23 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* the female referees who register as reserve national degree and above for 2022 and 2023.

Exclusion criteria

* Injured * Any reason can not complete all the required training sessions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical performance in fitness tests3 days before the interventionDistance covered during dynamic yo-yo test
Physiological performance in the fitness tests3days before the interventionThe HRmax and HRmean and lactic acid concentration during dynamic yo-yo test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physiological performance in the fitness tests3 days after the 12 weeks interventionThe HRmax and HRmean and lactic acid concentration in dynamic yo-yo test
Physical performance in fitness tests3 days after the 12 weeks interventionDistance covered during dynamic yo-yo test, evaluate the participants' ability to repeatedly perform intense exercise.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical performance in fitness testsSaturday of the fourth weekDistance covered during dynamic yo-yo test;The timing consume during the 40m repeat speed ability test;The timing consume during the change of direction test;
Training load12 weeks,during each high intensity trainingRPEcr10,RPEmuscle,RPErespiratory
Physiological performance in fitness testsSaturday of the fourth weekThe HRmax and HRmean and lactic acid concentration during dynamic yo-yo test

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactLingling ZHANG, PhD
qdzhll@hotmail.com+8613685326677
Backup ContactKIM Geok Soh, Professor
kims@upm.edu.my0397698153

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026