Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment Resistant Depression
Conditions
Keywords
40 Hz stimulation, Major Depressive Disorder, Light therapy, GENUS
Brief summary
Recent research in mice models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has demonstrated that one hour per day of exposure to 40 Hz flickering light therapy can halt the disease's progression, and improve cognition and memory. Moreover, recent data suggest that 40 Hz light stimulation may induce neuroplasticity and reduce neuroinflammation. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the antidepressant effects of 40 Hz light stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Patients will be exposed to 40 Hz invisible spectral flickering light (active setting) or continuous non-flickering white light (sham setting) in a home setting for 1 hour each day.
Detailed description
Major depression is a major societal challenge worldwide and a substantial proportion of patients do not attain remission. Major depressive disorder (MDD) bears several key neurobiological similarities with Alzheimer's Disease, namely cognitive deficits, impaired neuroplasticity, neurodegeneration, and neuroinflammation. Inducing neuroplasticity and reducing neuroinflammation are thought to be key cellular targets in the treatment of MDD. However, 40 Hz light stimulation research in the context of MDD is limited. In this double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial the primary objective is to investigate the antidepressant effect of a non-invasive neurostimulation therapy using a 40 Hz masked flickering light. This study utilizes a novel way of masking light by alternating the spectral composition of white light, resulting in the flicker unnoticeable to human perception. The primary outcome measure of this study is the estimated difference in the Hamilton Depression Rating sub-scale (HAM-D6) scores between groups at week 6. Furthermore, investigators want to assess whether 40 Hz masked flickering light therapy produces a similar early shift in neural and cognitive response to emotional information seen with antidepressant therapy and whether this predicts treatment efficacy. Suicidal ideation, sleep patterns, and quality of life will be also investigated in order to evaluate the 40 Hz masked flickering light stimulation effects on other symptoms of depression. Explorative analysis of the EEG data will be performed from baseline to week 6 for the further development and validation of EEG-based biomarkers. A total of 60 participants will be enrolled for a six weeks treatment period followed by a two weeks follow-up period. Participants will be recruited from a psychotherapeutic outpatient unit. Medication should be unchanged for the last 4 weeks and during the study period.
Interventions
DEVICENeurostimulation System (NSS): Active Setting
Exposure to the active device for 1 hour a day for 6 weeks
DEVICENeurostimulation System (NSS): Sham Setting
Exposure to the sham device for 1 hour a day for 6 weeks
Sponsors
Klaus Martiny
Technical University of Denmark
OptoCeutics
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Subjects between 18 and 75 years of age. 2. Subjects with a diagnosis of major depressive episode and currently experiencing a depressive episode according to DSM-5 3. Subjects with an MDI score \> 21 at screening 4. Subjects on stable medication and/or psychotherapy for at least 4 weeks before starting the trial. 5. Subjects, who are willing to comply with the scheduled plan and are able to use the device for 1 hour per day for 6 weeks. 6. Subjects who can understand the oral and written study information and willing to sign an informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
1. Subjects with a history of photosensitive migraines and/or epileptic seizures 2. Subjects with a known eye disorder that might be sensitive to light treatment. 3. Subjects with a known history of bipolar disorder according to DSM-5 criteria 4. Subjects with suicidal ideation corresponding to a score of 2 or more on the HAM-D 17 scale item 3 or if the patient or investigator is uncertain of the degree of suicidal risk 5. Subjects with current psychotic symptoms. However, subjects with a prior psychotic depression or subjects with an actual psychotic depression episode that at the time of informed consent no longer fulfills the psychosis criteria are allowed to participate. 6. Subjects with current drug or alcohol dependence based on their medical records or the M.I.N.I. interview. 7. Subjects with a known history of borderline personality disorder 8. Subjects currently enrolled in another investigational treatment study. 9. Subjects with progressive neurodegenerative or neoplastic disease. 10. Subjects who are unable to understand the study procedures or handling of the NSS device. 11. Subjects who are pregnant at the time of inclusion or unsafe contraception in women of fertile age
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Depression severity measured by Hamilton Depression Rating sub-scale (HAM-D6) | Baseline and week 6 | The HAM-D6 scale is designed to rate the severity of depression by a healthcare professional. The assessment scale contains 6 items pertaining to the symptoms of depression experienced over the week. The primary endpoint is the mean difference in scores between treatments at baseline and week 6. The score range is from, 0-24 (24=highest depression level). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-reported depression symptoms measured by Major Depression Inventory (MDI) | Baseline, week 1, 3, 6 and 8. | The MDI is a depression self-assessment questionnaire. It consists of the 10 ICD-10 symptoms for depression. The sum of 10 questions indicates the degree of depression. The score range is from 0-50 (50=highest depression level). |
| Cognition measured by Facial Expression Recognition Test (FERT) | Baseline, week 1 and 6 | Assessing attention and recognition of emotional facial expressions using the FERT. The outcome is accuracy (% correct expressions identified, range: 0-100, higher is better) and response times for accurate identifications (milliseconds, range can vary quite a bit, smaller number is better because it reflect higher speed). |
| Cognition measured by Emotional Categorization and Memory test (ECMT) | Baseline, week 1 and 6 | Assessing self-referent memory for emotional words using the ECMT. Outcome is response times for correct identifications during encoding phase (milliseconds, smaller better) and for recall phase: number of positive and negative words recalled (higher is better) |
| Cognition measured by Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP) | Baseline, week 1 and 6 | Non-emotional cognition is investigated with the SCIP. Outcomes is total score as well as scores for the five subtests, in all cases higher is better (numbers correct) |
| Sleep quality measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) | Baseline, week 3, 6 and 8 | PSQI consist of seven component scores that are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. A cut-off of 5 is recognized a indicative of sleep problems. |
| Sleep duration | Baseline, week 3, 6 and 8 | Average sleep duration assessed over last 7 days will be logged by the participants using a sleep diary. |
| Sleep timing | Baseline, week 3, 6 and 8 | Average sleep timing will be assessed over last 7 days logged by the participants using a sleep diary. |
| Cognition measured by Trail Making Test B (TMT- B) | Baseline, week 1 and 6 | Non-emotional cognition investigated with the Trail Making Test B (TMT- B). Outcome is time in seconds to complete the task, lower is better (higher speed) |
| Quality of Life measured by WHO quality of life index (WHO-5) | Baseline, week 3,6 and 8 | The WHO-5 score ranges from 0 to 25, with 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life. To obtain a percentage score ranging from 0 to 100, the raw score is multiplied by 4. A percentage score of 0 represents worst possible, whereas a score of 100 represents best possible quality of life. A 10% difference indicates a significant change. |
Countries
Denmark
Contacts
CONTACTKlaus Martiny
CONTACTMalina Ploug Larsen
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKlaus Martiny
Senior Consultant at Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen
Outcome results
None listed