Skip to content

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Polybutester Suture on Postoperative Complications in Lower Impacted Third Molar Surgery

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Polybutester Suture on Postoperative Complications in Lower Impacted Third Molar Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05679973
Enrollment
35
Registered
2023-01-11
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2020-09-01
Last updated
2023-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impacted Third Molar Tooth

Keywords

Polybutester, Polypropylene, Pain, Edema, Trismus

Brief summary

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of polybutester sutures on postoperative complications in lower impacted third molar surgery.

Detailed description

After extraction of the bilateral lower third molars (35 patients), two different types of sutures were used on each side. Group 1( Polybutester suture) , group 2 (Polypropylene suture). Measurements to evaluate edema, trismus, and pain (using the VAS scale) had been taken pre-procedure and post-procedure( 2nd and 7th day )

Interventions

DEVICEPolybutester suture

After third molar surgery this suture used for primary closure.

After third molar surgery this suture used for primary closure.

Sponsors

Yuzuncu Yil University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Any medication until 2 weeks before the operations, * Impacted teeth in mesial and horizontal positions and in class 2 and class B according to Pell & Gregory classification, * Asymptomatic impacted teeth. * Coming to control and fill in the given and requested forms, * Regularly use the given drugs

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic disease, * Smoking, * Pregnancy or breastfeeding, * Allergy to the drugs to be used in the study, * Using any additional medication that may affect the outcome of the study, * Post-operative alveolitis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain EvaluationPostoperative 1st dayPatients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analoge scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).
Edema evaluation using Facial measurementPreoperativeThe distance between predetermined facial anatomic landmarks (from the mandibular angle to lateral corner of the eye, from tragus to labial commissura, and from tragus to soft tissue pogonion) which was measured with using thread and millimeter ruler.
Edema evaluationPostoperative 7th dayPostoperative edema was evaluated by the distance between predetermined facial anatomic landmarks (from the mandibular angle to lateral corner of the eye, from tragus to labial commissura, and from tragus to soft tissue pogonion) which was measured with using thread and millimeter ruler.
Trismus EvaluationPreoperativePreoperative trismus was evaluated by the maximum distance between the incisive borders of the upper and lower right incisive teeth which were measured with a caliper.
Trismus evaluationPostoperative 2nd dayPostoperative trismus was evaluated by the maximum distance between the incisive borders of the upper and lower right incisive teeth which was measured with a caliper.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026