Skip to content

Vocal Cord vs Whole Laryngeal Radiotherapy for T1aN0 Glottic Cancer

Vocal Cord Only Hypofractionated Radiotherapy vs Whole Laryngeal Radiotherapy for T1aN0 Glottic Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05679856
Acronym
VC-Larynx
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-01-11
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2023-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glottic Carcinoma, Larynx Cancer Stage I

Keywords

Larynx, Glottic, T1, hypofractionated radiotherapy, Vocal cord, Laryngeal carcinoma

Brief summary

The primary objective of this prospective randomized clinical trial is to assess non inferiority in terms of local control achieved with single vocal cord hypofractionated radiotherapy compared to standard of care whole laryngeal radiotherapy in patients with T1aN0 glottic cancer . Secondary objectives include overall survival rate and to compare the Voice Handicap Index score between the 2 arms as well as acute and late toxicities. Patients are randomized in 1:1 ratio.

Detailed description

Most laryngeal cancers present in early stage and more than two thirds of it occur in the glottic region(T1-T2). Early glottic carcinoma is historically treated with conventional radiotherapy using large box fields (from lower border of hyoid to lower border of cricoid), using wedged parallel opposed photon beams. In spite of good local control rate of more than 90% for T1a glottic cases, the tumor-free contralateral vocal cord, arytenoids, thyroid cartilage, and all muscles responsible for opening and closing the vocal cords, the swallowing muscles, carotid arteries and thyroid gland are exposed to high radiation doses (fully or partially) which could lead to an increased probability of complications that negatively influence the quality of life of these patients. Typical complications have involved voice/ speech impairment, diet problems (swallowing, trismus), arytenoids edema, an increased risk of strokes, and reduced treatment options for previously irradiated patients. Many studies showed that increasing fraction size and shortening the overall treatment time (hypofractionated radiotherapy) could result in better local control of T1 glottic cancer The use of 63Gy/28 Fractions(Fx) showed superior local control compared with conventional use of 66Gy/33Fx with shorter overall treatment time. Based on this study this dose is the standard in our institute. In contrast to the traditional radiotherapy principle to treat the whole larynx, surgical laser excision of T1a glottic cancer involves removal of gross tumor with minimal, often sub-millimeter, excisional margins with good oncological outcome and good quality of voice. Similar to this surgical concept and with modern radiotherapy IMRT/VMAT technique, the approach of single vocal cord irradiation (SVCI) was introduced. A study of 30 patients with T1a glottis cancer treated by image guided vocal cord radiotherapy was published in 2015 and it showed 100% local control at 2 years and with no grade 3 toxicities reported and better quality of voice when compared to historical cohorts Dosimetric analysis showed that IMRT resulted in markedly reducing the dose to contralateral cord, arytenoids, thyroid cartilage, inferior constrictor muscle and carotid arteries. To date no prospective phase 3 trial was done to compare treatment outcome and toxicity profile of vocal cord only hypofractionated radiotherapy vs traditional whole laryngeal radiotherapy.

Interventions

RADIATIONHypofractionated single vocal cord irradiation

Only the affected vocal cord with additional margin to account for motion and setup errors will receive 58.08Gy/16 fractions using IMRT/VMAT technique

RADIATIONWhole laryngeal radiotherapy

The whole larynx from lower border of hyoid bone to lower border of cricoid cartilage will receive 63Gy/28 fractions using IMRT/VMAT technique

Sponsors

Cairo University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Cancer Institute, Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* T10N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma * Ability to provide written informed consent * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2

Exclusion criteria

* Previous head and neck irradiation. * WHO performance status above 2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Local controlat 1 year follow upRate of local control

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Voice Handicap indexPretreatment- 2 months 6 months 1 year and 1 year follow upnVoice Handicap index score Scores are rated on a 0-4 scale to indicate the presence and severity of the symptoms. Lower scores represent better functioning and quality of life.
Rates of acute toxicityWeek 0 post-treatment and at 2-month follow-upRates of acute toxicity as per CTCAE v5.0
Rates of chronic toxicityat 6 months - 1 year and 2 years follow upRates of chronic toxicity as per CTCAE v5.0
Overall survivalat 2 year follow upOverall survival

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed Mortada Elsharief
drmohamedelcherif@gmail.com+0201128512966

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026