Arthritis, Avascular Necrosis, Traumatic Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of this randomized, controlled, monocentric, single-blind, 2-arm, feasibility clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety of MectaShield hydrogel coating and to capture its preliminary clinical performance in the prevention of early peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing cementless revision hip arthroplasty. The main questions it aims to answer are: * demonstrate that the hydrogel coating MectaShield does not interfere with primary stability; * evaluate clinical and functional outcomes, the rate of PJI and possible adverse events. Participants will undergo cementless revision hip arthroplasty; during surgery MectaShield hydrogel coating is applied on orthopaedic implants' surfaces (femoral stem and, if revised, acetabular cup) as a protective barrier for the prevention of bacterial adhesion. Surgery and follow-up are completed as per local standard practice. Stability will be assessed radiologically, while functional outcomes and PJI will be monitored by HOOS-PS, ASESPIS scores and according to the consensus document presented by European Society of Radiology (ESRa), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). Researchers will compare the results of the treatment group with those from a control group receiving cementless revision hip arthroplasty without the application of MectaShiled hydrogel coating.
Detailed description
Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is among the first three reasons for joint replacement failure. PJI is a serious condition that may lead to repeated surgical interventions, prolonged hospitalization, high costs, and significant morbidity, although low mortality. To address this concern, antibacterial coating of implants has been proposed, as the adherence of the microorganisms to the implant, forming a biofilm, plays a strategic role in the pathogenesis of PJI. MectaShield (Medacta International SA) is a novel resorbable hydrogel coating intended to be spread on orthopaedic implants' surfaces as a protective barrier for the prevention of PJI. The study aims to evaluate the safety of MectaShield and to capture its preliminary clinical performance in the prevention of early PJI in patients undergoing cementless revision hip arthroplasty. Patients suitable to receive MectaShield for cementless revision hip arthroplasty will be invited to take part to the study during the preoperative visit. Follow-up is performed after 3 and 12 months. Data collection includes clinical and functional data for preoperative and postoperative assessments, as well as intraoperative details, adverse events and device deficiencies. Patients will be randomized 1:1 in 2 groups: * Control (no MectaShield) * MectaShield hydrogel coating (+ antibiotic) The primary objective is to demonstrate that MectaShield hydrogel coating does not interfere with early primary stability at 3 months of follow-up Secondary objectives are: 1. To demonstrate that MectaShield does not interfere with primary stability at 12 months of follow-up 2. To evaluate clinical and functional outcomes at 3 and 12 months of follow-up 3. To evaluate the rate of PJI at 3 and 12 months of follow-up 4. To evaluate the occurrence of adverse events and device deficiencies
Interventions
DEVICEHydrogel coating
hydrogel coating applied to implant's surfaces during cementless hip revision arthroplasty
PROCEDUREControl
standard cementless hip revision arthroplasty
Sponsors
Medacta International SA
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The study requires a blinded evaluator for the assessment of the primary outcome (i.e. radiological signs of failed osseointegration). The investigators and the participating patients are not blinded to treatment allocation.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Informed Consent signed by the subject * Males and females aged over 18 years at time of surgery * Subjects who are scheduled to receive a conical collarless cementless revision hip arthroplasty, with or without revision of the acetabular cup * Subjects willing to comply with the pre- and post-operative evaluation schedule
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects with one or more medical conditions identified as a contraindication defined by the labelling on any implants used in this study * Subjects with immune suppressive treatment for organ transplantation, or known allergy to MectaShield hydrogel constituents (Chitlac, Mannitol, Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, Sodium phosphate dibasic) * Subjects presenting with progressive local or systemic infection at the time of surgery * Subjects whose prospects for a recovery to independent mobility would be compromised by known coexistent, medical problems * Subjects affected by concomitant spine, hip, ankle or contralateral knee pathologies that can affect walking capacity * Subjects unable to understand and take action * Subjects undergoing cementless revision hip arthroplasty in emergency interventions
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stem subsidence | 3 months follow up | Radiological measurements of stem subsidence (mm) will be performed in hydrogel coating and control groups, and mean subsidence will be compared |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Presence of radiolucent zones in the femur | 3 and 12 months follow up | Presence of radiolucent lines (≥1 mm) in the 7 Gruen zones will be assessed by radiologic assessment. |
| Cup migration (if revised) | 3 and 12 months follow up | Radiological measurements will be performed on the Acetabular cup (if revised) to measure cup migration. |
| Cup orientation (if revised) | 3 and 12 months follow up | Radiological measurements will be performed on the Acetabular cup (if revised) to measure cup tilt. |
| Presence of radiolucent lines in the acetabular cup (if revised) | 3 and 12 months follow up | Radiological measurements will be performed on the Acetabular cup (if revised) to evaluate the presence of radiolucent lines in the 3 DeLee-Charnley zones (≥1mm). |
| Stem subsidence | 12 months follow up | Radiological measurements of stem subsidence (mm) will be performed in hydrogel coating and control groups, and mean subsidence will be compared. |
| Signs of infection | 3 and 12 months follow up | Evaluation of any sign of infection at the site of surgery, measured with the ASESPIS score (acronym for Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria, and Stay as inpatient prolonged over 14 days) \[0 - \>40, best to worst\]. |
| occurrence of PJI | up to 12 months | The occurrence of PJI is assessed with the diagnostic flowchart proposed by the consensus document issued by the European Society of Radiology (ESRa), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). |
| Peri-operative and postoperative adverse events and device deficiencies. | up to 12 months | Monitoring of any peri-operative and postoperative adverse events and device deficiencies. |
| Clinical and functional outcomes | 3 and 12 months follow up | Evaluation of daily-life activities, measured with the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS) \[0 - 100, worst to best\]. |
Countries
Austria
Contacts
Primary ContactMarco Viganó, PhD
Outcome results
None listed