Skip to content

Effects of Coherent Breathing Breathwork on Health

Effects of Coherent Breathing Breathwork on Mental Health and Wellbeing: A Randomised Placebo-controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05676658
Enrollment
400
Registered
2023-01-09
Start date
2023-02-22
Completion date
2023-04-26
Last updated
2023-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, Sleep Disturbance, Stress, Wellbeing

Brief summary

The investigators are conducting a randomised-controlled trial comparing coherent breathing at \ 5.5 breath cycles per minute-bcpm (with equal inhalation/exhalation durations of \ 5.5secs each) to a well-designed placebo (paced breathing at 12bcpm with equal inhalation/exhalation durations of 2.5secs each). The metric of 12bcpm is in line with guidance from the British Journal of Nursing, Royal College of Physicians, and Johns Hopkins University which state that the average, healthy bcpm should range from: 12-20bcpm, 12-18bcpm, and 12-16bcpm, respectively, hence the investigators chose the minimum/lower bound for the active placebo control group. The main questions that our study attempts to address are: Does coherent breathing (and placebo coherent breathing) lead to improved mental health and wellbeing in a general population adult sample? The study will be conducted entirely online through the research platform Prolific, so participant data will be anonymous. The investigators will collect self-reports of mental health and wellbeing before and after the four-week breathwork period, along with a follow-up one-month later. Pre-post intervention and follow-up questionnaires will be completed online via the survey platform Qualtrics which will be linked to Prolific. Participants will also be asked how many times they practiced out of the assigned 28 days, to gauge self-reported adherence to the protocol. The investigators can then observe whether self-reported adherence correlates with changes in mental health and wellbeing, if any. Data on the self-reported credibility/expectancy of the breathwork randomly allocated to participants will also be collected, along with open-ended responses on participants' overall experience of the protocol/study.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCoherent breathing

Guided audio of coherent breathing pre-recorded by trained breathwork facilitator: \ 5.5bcpm (with equal inhalation/exhalation durations of \ 5.5secs each) for \ 10mins/day over four weeks / 28 days. Delivered remotely through audio link.

BEHAVIORALPlacebo coherent breathing

Same audio of coherent breathing but paced at: \ 12bcpm (with equal inhalation/exhalation durations of 2.5secs each) for \ 10mins/day over four weeks / 28 days.

Sponsors

Sylff Association
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Sussex
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

(self-assessed): * 18+ years of age (18 is the automatic minimum age on Prolific) * Able to breathe through nose * Have access to headphones * The following pre-screeners on Prolific will also be set so only those eligible on Prolific will see the study: Located/living in UK, Fluent in English, approval rate of 98% and at least 20 previous submissions (as recommended by Prolific to increase retention and reduce dropout rates in longitudinal and multi-part studies)

Exclusion criteria

(self-assessed): * Any problems which affect ones ability to pace their breathing (i.e., active/chronic respiratory infection including blocked nose/cough/cold/fever, etc.), breathlessness, cardiovascular problems, respiratory conditions or diseases (i.e., uncontrolled symptomatic asthma, COPD, lung cancer, etc.), abnormally slow breathing (bradypnea), or abnormally fast breathing (tachypnoea) * Any other physical/mental health conditions or current life events which impair or affect ones ability to engage in activities involving breath control

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective stressPre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention). Primary timepoint is post-interventionDepression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) - stress subscale (score range: 0-21; higher scores denote worse outcome). Score on DASS-21 is then multiplied by two to convert it to the longer form DASS-42 final score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective wellbeingPre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)The World Health Organisation-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) (score range: 0-25; higher scores denote better outcome)
Subjective sleep disturbancePre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)PROMIS Item Bank v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance - Short Form 8a (score range: 5-40; higher scores denote worse outcome). Data scored using a T-score transformation according to PROMIS Sleep scoring manual on: www.healthmeasures.net
Self-reported adherence to protocolPost-intervention (immediately after the intervention)Number of sessions participants self-report practicing out of 28 days assigned
Self-reported credibility and expectancy of protocolImmediately after starting breathwork interventionCredibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ-6). Two Sets (Credibility of course/therapy \[breathwork\] and expectancy of course/therapy \[breathwork\]). Four items scored 1-9 and two items scored 0-100%. Higher scores denote greater credibility and/or expectancy of specific breathwork technique
Subjective anxietyPre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)DASS-21 - anxiety subscale (score range: 0-21; higher scores denote worse outcome)
Subjective depressive symptomsPre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)DASS-21 - depression subscale (score range: 0-21; higher scores denote worse outcome)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypothesis guessingFollow-up (four weeks after the intervention)Optional open-ended question on whether participants can guess the hypothesis of the study
Overall experiencePost-intervention and follow-up (immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)Optional open-ended questions on participants' perspectives and overall experience of the protocol/study-period
Impairment of practicePost-intervention (immediately after the intervention)Optional open-ended question on whether anything impaired participants' ability to perform their randomly allocated breathwork

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026