Skip to content

Central Nervous System Stimulants and Physical Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Effect of Central Nervous System Stimulants on Physical Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05675098
Acronym
CP
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-01-09
Start date
2023-05-01
Completion date
2027-02-01
Last updated
2023-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Keywords

methylphenidate, Modafinil, physical therapy, motor performance, spasticity, physical function

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of Central Nervous System Stimulants, represented by Methylphenidate and Modafinil, compared to placebo control on motor performance in children with Cerebral Palsy. This study will be a triple-masked study per the American Academy of Neurology guidelines for clinical trials.

Detailed description

Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a neurological disorder that commonly cause disability and limit physical function in children, and this disability persists into adulthood. There are several treatment options for motor impairments associated with CP, including oral medications (diazepam or related benzodiazepines, baclofen, dantrolene, and tizanidine hydrochloride), intraspinal infusion (baclofen), paralyzing agents (Botulinum toxin), and surgical interventions (dorsal rhizotomy). However, these interventions have drawbacks that could impact their benefits, such as drowsiness with oral medications and permanent change in muscle tone with the rhizotomy surgery. Other rehabilitation interventions showed significant improvements in motor function such as constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and strength training. A few researchers attempted using central nervous system stimulants (i.e., Modafinil \[Provigil\]) off-label for improving motor control and reducing spasticity in children with CP. Another medication that has been used for motor impairments is Methylphenidate (MPH), also a central nervous system stimulant. However, this medication was used for improving muscle tone and motor performance in children with Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), but not in children with CP. MPH is useful for children with combined CP and ADHD and showed beneficial results for ADHD symptoms and behavioral outcomes with minimal side effects. Therefore, the purpose of this pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to examine the effects of Central Nervous System (CNS) stimulants (Modafinil and MPH) vs. placebo in addition to physical therapy intervention on gross motor function and spasticity in children with CP.

Interventions

DRUGMethylphenidate

This medication is a psychostimulant medication and is usually prescribed for individuals with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder to manage ADHD behavioral symptoms

DRUGModafinil

This medication is a Central Nervous System stimulant and is usually used to treat neurological conditions, including Narcolepsy

OTHERPlacebo

Participant will receive placebo tablets (Methylphenidate and Modafinil shape)

Sponsors

Kuwait University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children diagnosed with spastic diplegic or quadriplegic CP by a physician. * Children aged between 7-12 years old. * Children with CP classified as level I & II based on the gross motor function classification system (GMFCS). * Children with CP that are receiving physical therapy for ≥ 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Children that had a seizure attack in the past 6 months * Children that have been diagnosed with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) * Children that had any surgery within the last 6 months * Children that has lower-extremity contractures determined by the passive range of motion (hips, knees, and ankles) * Children that use medications that interfere with spasticity (e.g., Baclofen)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gross motor function measure (GMFM)Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after interventionTo determine changes in functional motor abilities.
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after interventionTo determine changes in spasticity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Five times sit to stand test (5x Sit-To-Stand Test /5XSST)Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after interventionTo assess the change in functional strength
Modified clinical test for sensory interaction of balance (MCTSIB)Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after interventionTo assess static balance
Ten-meter walk test (10MWT) (normal pace)Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after interventionTo assess change in gait speed
Body heightBaseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after interventionTo determine body height
The University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSDSOBQ)Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after interventionTo determine changes in respiratory function
Body weightBaseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after interventionTo determine body weight
2-Minutes Walking Test (normal pace)Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after interventionTo determine changes in fatigue
Timed up and go (TUG)Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after interventionTo assess dynamic balance

Countries

Kuwait

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026