Skip to content

Prospective Evaluation of Intrathecal Targeted Drug Delivery for Cancer Associated Pain

Intrathecal Targeted Drug Delivery for Cancer Associated Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05674240
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-01-06
Start date
2022-12-06
Completion date
2026-03-20
Last updated
2026-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer Associated Pain, Cancer Pain, Chronic Pain, Neuropathic Pain

Keywords

targeted drug delivery, cancer pain, conservative pain management, neuromodulation, opioid, healthcare-utilization, quality of life

Brief summary

This Registry study will prospectively evaluate the differences in treatment outcomes in terms of pain intensity, pain interference, concomitant medication use, health-related quality of life, opioid adverse effects, and healthcare utilization between targeted drug delivery and conservative medication management only groups.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, open-label, short term patient registry where up to 169 subjects with cancer associated pain will be enrolled. Subjects with cancer associated pain who are receiving conservative medical management (CMM) only and cancer patients receiving Intrathecal Drug Delivery system (IDDs) along with CMM will be followed for up to 3 months. Subjects will be evaluated monthly up to 3 months from the medical care initiation which is the implant day for the IDDs group and start of the new treatment plan for the CMM group. Subjects that decide to cross-over to the IDDs group in a future date, will still be followed for their progress. Based on routine care, subjects will be seen at day of implant, 1 month post-implant, 2 months post-implant, and 3- and 6- months post-implant.

Interventions

DEVICEIntrathecal Targeted Drug Delivery

Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDs) deliver small doses of analgesics directly to the spinal cord.

Including physical therapy, oral or transdermal medications and injections

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age of 21 and older * Uncontrolled cancer-associated pain (pain score of \>5 on NRS) despite oral use of 60 mg/d morphine equivalent a week prior to screening * Adverse side effects from long term opioid use defined as limiting or severely affecting patient's day to day function * Life expectancy of \> 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* Active infections * Controlled pain without adverse side effects that are limiting day to day function * Mechanical barriers * Obstruction of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain Intensity from Screening through 3-Months3-MonthsChange from baseline to Month 3 post treatment plan implementation in average pain as measured through Numerical Rating Scale (0-10 where higher scores mean worse outcome)
Change in Pain Interference from Screening through 3-Months3-MonthsChange from baseline to Month 3 post treatment plan implementation in pain interference as measured through Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Drug Adverse Levels3-MonthsAverage change from baseline to 3-Months in drug adverse levels as assessed through the Common Toxicity Criteria
Change in Oral Opioid Intake3-MonthsAverage change from baseline to 3-Months in oral opioid intake
Change in Healthcare Utilization3-MonthsAverage change from baseline to 3-Months in healthcare utilization as assessed by number of emergency, inpatient, and outpatient visits due to pain
Change in Patient Well-Being3-MonthsAverage change from baseline to 3-Months in patient well-being as measured through Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) (0-4 where higher scores mean worse outcome)
Change in Patient Global Impression Change3-MonthsAverage change from baseline to 3-Months in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (1-7 where higher scores mean better outcome)

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLauren Littlefield, MD

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026