Skip to content

International Post-PCI FFR Extended Registry

International Post-PCI FFR Registry for Extended Follow up Outcomes After Coronary Stenting

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05672862
Enrollment
2128
Registered
2023-01-05
Start date
2021-09-06
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Disease

Keywords

fractional flow reserve, percutaneous coronary intervention, drug-eluting stent, coronary atherosclerosis

Brief summary

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment strategy for coronary artery disease (CAD). With the presence of myocardial ischemia, PCI reduces the risks of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization compared to medical therapy. However, the risk of future clinical events remains high, and about 10% of patients experienced further cardiovascular events after PCI. Several factors are associated with these poor outcomes. Well-known patient-related risk factors are diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, left ventricular dysfunction, previous MI, and presentation with acute coronary syndrome. Procedure-related factors, such as stent under expansion, malposition, edge dissection, the number of the used stent, and total stent length, are also related to poor prognosis after PCI. Recent studies reported that fractional flow reserve (FFR) after coronary stenting, or post-PCI FFR, was associated with future clinical outcomes after PCI, and low post-PCI FFR value was associated with procedural factors. However, optimal cut-off values of post-PCI FFR ranged widely, from 0.86 to 0.96, and some studies reported the limited prognostic value of post-PCI FFR. This might result from differences in study populations, the definition of outcomes, type of stent used, and distribution of included vessels among previous studies. Previously, the investigators incorporated previous data into the International Post-PCI FFR registry and demonstrated the prognostic value of post-PCI FFR using the machine learning technique. However, the results were based on the two years follow-up of patients after PCI, and the prognostic value of post-PCI FFR in long-term outcomes is still uncertain. Therefore, the investigators planned to extend the International Post-PCI FFR registry to define the long-term prognostic implication of post-PCI FFR.

Detailed description

The investigators planned to extend the International Post-PCI FFR registry (NCT04684043) to explore the long-term prognostic value of post-PCI FFR. The International Post-PCI FFR registry (NCT04684043) already included the 2,200 patients who underwent PCI and measured post-PCI FFR between June 2011 and May 2018. As the clinical, angiographic, and physiologic data are already collected in the International Post PCI FFR registry, the investigators will further collect the most recent clinical outcome data until 2021.5 and incorporate them into the International Post-PCI FFR Extended registry. As the current study will evaluate clinical outcomes at 5 years, 2,128 patients who underwent PCI and measured post-PCI FFR between June 2011 and Nov 2016 will be included and studied. The investigators will request further clinical outcome data from 10 hospitals that provided the data for the International Post-PCI FFR registry before. A standardized form of a spreadsheet, including standardized definitions of variables, was used to collect the individual patient data from the principal investigators of each qualified registry. Patient clinical, angiographic, and physiologic data at the time of index PCI were recorded and already collected at Seoul National University Hospital. As clinical outcome data of 2 years of follow-up after index PCI are already collected in the International Post-PCI FFR registry (NCT04684043), clinical outcome data after 2 years of index PCI will be collected by medical records until 2021.5 of each hospital. All submitted data were double-checked by a central monitoring team in Seoul National University Hospital. All patients' identifying numbers are anonymized as Subject\_No and the investigators will request the patients' clinical outcome data using these anonymized identifying numbers of the patients. Also, the investigators will share collected data with collaborators, using these numbers.

Interventions

DEVICEPercutaneous coronary intervention

PCI was performed using drug-eluting stents

Sponsors

Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, South Korea
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Samsung Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sejong General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Bon-Kwon Koo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Patients who underwent PCI and post-PCI FFR measurements after angiographically successful stent implantation (residual stenosis \< 20% by visual estimation)

Exclusion criteria

* Post-PCI TIMI (The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow of \< 3 * Depressed left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction \< 30%) * Culprit lesion for the acute coronary syndrome * Graft vessel * Collateral feeder * In-stent stenosis * Primary myocardial or valvular heart disease * Patients with life expectancy \< 2 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The cumulative incidence (percent) of target vessel failure5 yearsTarget vessel failure is a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. The cumulative incidence will be calculated as Kaplan-Mier estimates at 5 years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The cumulative incidence (percent) of cardiac death or myocardial infarction5 yearsThis outcome is a composite of cardiac death and target vessel myocardial infarction. The cumulative incidence will be calculated as Kaplan-Mier estimates at 5 years.
The cumulative incidence (percent) of target vessel myocardial infarction5 yearsTarget vessel myocardial infarction is myocardial infarction that occurred in the target vessel in which post-PCI FFR was measured. The cumulative incidence will be calculated as Kaplan-Mier estimates at 5 years.
The cumulative incidence (percent) of target vessel revascularization5 yearsTarget vessel revascularization is a revascularization event in the target vessel in which post-PCI FFR was measured. The cumulative incidence will be calculated as Kaplan-Mier estimates at 5 years.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cut-off value of post-PCI FFR5 yearsDefine the best cut-off value for predicting future adverse events. The optimal cut-off value of post-PCI FFR for predicting outcomes was calculated based on maximizing the difference of log-rank statistics.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026