Skip to content

Study on the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formula

Study on the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formula

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05672693
Enrollment
500
Registered
2023-01-05
Start date
2023-01-31
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2023-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formula

Brief summary

In this study, we will retrospectively collect patients who have performed phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation in our hospital, collect various preoperative biometric data and postoperative refractive data of patients, conduct statistical analysis, and compare the accuracy of various IOL calculation formulas.

Interventions

OTHERSeveral Calculation Formulas of Intraocular Lens

Comparison of the accuracy of several intraocular lens calculation formulas

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* (1) Conform to the diagnosis of cataract; (2) No complications occurred during and after operation; (3) Before and after operation, the measurement of ocular biological characteristics and refractive state can be successfully completed; (4) Patients who can be followed up regularly after operation.

Exclusion criteria

* (1) Serious intraoperative or postoperative complications; (2) Complicated with other eye diseases unsuitable for intraocular lens implantation; (3) Patients with systemic diseases cannot tolerate surgery; (4) Patients with incomplete follow-up data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean absolute error1 week、1 month and 3 months postoperationThe Friedman test was applied to compare the median absolute error between the formulas after the zeroing of the mean numerical error. Post hoc analysis and Bonferroni correction was performed for multiple comparisons.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distribution of error within ± 0.25D, ± 0.5D, ± 0.75D,and ± 1.0D1 week、1 month and 3 months postoperationFrequency comparisons were made with the chi-square test

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactWen Xu, PHD
xuwen2003@zju.edu.cn13858185223

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026