Anti-epileptic Prophylaxis in Intracranial Neurosurgery
Conditions
Keywords
anti-epileptic prophylaxis, intracranial neurosurgery, epileptic seizures
Brief summary
JUSTIFICATION Anti-epileptic prophylaxis has long been a systematic practice for supra-tentorial intracranial surgeries. Since 2021, European guidelines no longer recommend this prophylaxis and practices have evolved. We therefore propose to compare epileptic seizure's occurrence in the first postoperative month between two groups of neurosurgical patients.The first group consists of patients treated between January 2019 and late 2020 who were given systematic prophylaxis. Patients from the second group were treated between 2021 and 2022 and did not receive any prophylaxis. The secondary objective will consist in identifying the number of patients placed on prophylaxis, the length of prophylaxis, treatment's side effects (depression, elevated liver enzymes…), and comparing patients' neurological outcome at 3 and 6 months after surgical procedures.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adults over 18 years old * Expressed non-opposition * Patient who underwent supratentorial intracranial surgery (either resection or biopsy) at Brest University Hospital from January 01, 2019 to September 01, 2022.
Exclusion criteria
* Refusal to participate * Patient under legal protection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The number of epileptic seizures during the first postoperative month (between D-0 and D-30) of neurosurgery patients treated for elective supratentorial intracranial procedures. | the first postoperative month (between D-0 and D-30) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Commencement of anti-epileptic treatment Length of prophylaxis Treatment's side effects Neurological outcome at 3 and 6 months (RANKIN modified score) | 6 months |
Countries
France