Skip to content

lIfestyle iNterventionS for PaIn ReliEf (INSPIRE)

Molecular Signatures of Endocannabinoid Induced Pain Relief in Humans: Lifestyle Interventions, Systemic and Localised Changes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05670314
Acronym
INSPIRE
Enrollment
117
Registered
2023-01-04
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2025-02-25
Last updated
2025-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Brief summary

This is a 2x2 factorial design randomised controlled trial in which participants with knee pain will be grouped into the diet intervention, exercise intervention, diet and exercise intervention or placebo arm. The study involves intake of dietary supplements and performing routine exercises which are commonly used and are not pharmacological agents. N= 117. 2x2 intervention with individuals per block: placebo (n=27), diet only (n=26), exercise only (n=40), diet + exercise (n=24)

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTInulin Fibre supplement

20g/ day. Inulin is easily dissolvable in liquid and can be incorporated into the usual diet - by adding to water, juice, smoothies, cereal, yogurt etc.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTMaltodextrin (Placebo)

10g/ day which can be consumed by adding to breakfast cereal/ smoothie/ yogurt or drink of choice

BEHAVIORALExercise

Joint Academy An app-based exercises platform (Joint Academy®) will be used as an intervention given to the treatment arm. The programme consists of a mixture of open and close chain exercises, a combination of concentric, eccentric and focusing on the global strength of legs including the muscles around the hips and knee joints as well as balance enhancement exercises.

Sponsors

University of Nottingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Randomisation will be performed using an online software (sealedenvelope.com). The inulin vs placebo allocation will be double blinded. The exercise part of the intervention will not be blinded

Intervention model description

2x2 intervention with individuals per block: placebo (n=27), diet only (n=26), exercise only (n=40), diet + exercise (n=24)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with any pain in or around a knee on most days for more than 3 months * Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study * Participant eligibility includes those aged \>18 years who have a body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 39.9 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following apply: * Have psychosocial or gastrointestinal (e.g. malabsorptive conditions such as IBS/IBD, coeliac) * Are taking the following medications: immunosuppressants, anticoagulants, amiodarone and/or perhexiline * Are currently following or anticipated to commence a specialised commercially available weight loss diet and/or program * Pregnant or breast feeding * History or current psychiatric illness * History or current neurological condition (e.g. epilepsy) * Those undergoing revision, having severe hip OA, inflammatory arthropathies * Diagnosed non-OA cause of knee pain (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) * Neuropathy or diabetes mellitus * Having taken part in a research study in the last 3 months involving invasive procedures or an inconvenience allowance (this must remain for ALL UoN FMHS UREC approved studies)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for PainBaseline and 6 weeksThe Numerical Rate Score (NRS) will be used to assess the changes in the level of pain in response to the intervention between baseline and follow-up. Participants reported their pain on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG)Baseline and 6 weeksTime in seconds to stand up, walk 3m, return, and sit. Average of 3 trials at baseline and follow-up (at the end of 6 weeks).
Change in Functional Outcome Grip StrengthBaseline and 6 weeksMeasured with dynamometer; average of 3 trials on dominant hand in seated position with participant applying as much grip pressure as possible on the dynamometer. The maximum reading (kg) in taken for each repetition.
Change in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS)Baseline and 6 weeksPain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality temporal summation (TS). TS assesses sensitivity to sharpness by applying a brief pinprick stimulus (256 mN Pinprick; MRC-Systems, Heidelberg, Germany) to the skin with higher ratings potentially suggesting increased spinal cord pain sensitivity. A single stimulus was applied to the rectus femoris (5cm above the mid-point of the patella of the most painful knee), followed by 10 repetitive stimuli at 1/s. Participants rated pain/sharpness intensity on a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale after both the single and the average of the repeated stimuli. Each test was performed twice, with a 2-minute break between repetitions and the average was taken.
Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella SiteBaseline and 6 weeksPain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: quadricep (2cm above superolateral edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.
Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella SiteBaseline and 6 weeksPain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: quadricep (2cm above superomedial edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.
Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line SiteBaseline and 6 weeksPain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from abeline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at the anatomical position: medial joint line (3cm medially from medial edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.
Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle SiteBaseline and 6 weeksPain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: tibialis anterior (5 cm distal and 1 cm lateral to the tibial tuberosity). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.
Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle SiteBaseline and 6 weeksPain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: brachioradialis (5 cm medial and distal to the lateral epicondyle) on the arm opposite the painful knee. PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the arm opposite the painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.
Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric AcidBaseline and 6 weeksChange in serum levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyric acid in response to the interventions. SCFA levels in serum will be measured using mass spectrometry.
Change in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST)Baseline and 6 weeksMeasures how many times a participant can rise from a chair to a full standing position in 30 seconds.
Change in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) LevelsBaseline and 6 weeksChange in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.
Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein LevelsBaseline and 6 weeksChange in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.
Change in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) LevelsBaseline and 6 weeksChange in Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.
Changes in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index)Baseline and 6 weeksThe gut microbiome will be measured with shotgun metagenomic sequencing of stool samples and the Shannon Diversity Index will be calculated. The Shannon Diversity Index assesses both the richness (number of different species) and evenness (distribution of individuals among species) within the gut microbiome. A higher Shannon index indicates a more diverse microbiome, while a lower index suggests less diversity.
Change in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) LevelsBaseline and 6 weeksSerum levels of Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) will be measured using mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). This will help us ascertain the change in levels of Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) in response to the intervention.
Change in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid LevelsBaseline and 6 weeksSerum levels of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid will be measured using mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). This will help us ascertain the change in levels of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid in response to the intervention.
Changes in Calcium Voltage-gated Channel Subunit alpha1 B Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of IndividualsBaseline and 6 weeksTranscriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood, and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.
Changes in Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 5 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of IndividualsBaseline and 6 weeksTranscriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood, and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.
Changes in Sodium Voltage-gated Channel Alpha Subunit 11 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of IndividualsBaseline and 6 weeksTranscriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected atbaseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood,and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.
Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic AcidBaseline and 6 weeksChange in serum levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) acetic acid in response to theinterventions. SCFA levels in serum will be measured using mass spectrometry.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo Arm
The participants in the placebo/control arm will be required to take 10g of maltodextrin for the same period of 6 weeks.
27
Diet Only Arm
The participants in the dietary intervention arm will be required to take 20g of inulin for a period of 6 weeks.
26
Exercise Only Arm
Joint Academy An app-based exercises platform (Joint Academy®) will be used as an intervention given to the treatment arm. The programme consists of a mixture of open and close chain exercises, a combination of concentric, eccentric and focusing on the global strength of legs including the muscles around the hips and knee joints as well as balance enhancement exercises. The intervention also includes educational sessions integrated into the programme covering the basics of OA, its treatment, self-managing symptoms of OA and the benefits of maintaining a healthy lifestyle. The exercise intervention focuses on core stability and performance, neuromuscular leg strengthening and balance enhancement.
40
Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm
The participants in this arm will be required to take 20g of inulin for a period of 6 weeks and doing exercise at the same time.
24
Total117

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo ArmDiet Only ArmExercise Only ArmDiet + Exercise Intervention ArmTotal
Age, Continuous69.59 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.41
66.54 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.39
67.75 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.22
66.71 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.44
67.69 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.48
Body mass index29.60 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.65
30.15 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.75
29.00 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.15
29.60 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.65
29.48 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.32
Pain Numerical Rating Scale3.52 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.77
4.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.85
4.21 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.88
3.92 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75
3.96 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.67
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants14 Participants26 Participants14 Participants68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants12 Participants14 Participants10 Participants49 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 260 / 400 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2710 / 260 / 4013 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 260 / 400 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain

The Numerical Rate Score (NRS) will be used to assess the changes in the level of pain in response to the intervention between baseline and follow-up. Participants reported their pain on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain0.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Diet Only ArmChange in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain-0.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
Exercise Only ArmChange in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain-1.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain-1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
Secondary

Change in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST)

Measures how many times a participant can rise from a chair to a full standing position in 30 seconds.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST)1.23 standsStandard Deviation 1.67
Diet Only ArmChange in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST)2.12 standsStandard Deviation 3.02
Exercise Only ArmChange in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST)2.54 standsStandard Deviation 3.38
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST)3.21 standsStandard Deviation 5.37
Secondary

Change in Functional Outcome Grip Strength

Measured with dynamometer; average of 3 trials on dominant hand in seated position with participant applying as much grip pressure as possible on the dynamometer. The maximum reading (kg) in taken for each repetition.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Functional Outcome Grip Strength-1.43 kgStandard Deviation 6.44
Diet Only ArmChange in Functional Outcome Grip Strength0.76 kgStandard Deviation 3.42
Exercise Only ArmChange in Functional Outcome Grip Strength0.02 kgStandard Deviation 5.62
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Functional Outcome Grip Strength0.76 kgStandard Deviation 3.42
Secondary

Change in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG)

Time in seconds to stand up, walk 3m, return, and sit. Average of 3 trials at baseline and follow-up (at the end of 6 weeks).

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG)-0.43 secondsStandard Deviation 1.06
Diet Only ArmChange in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG)-1.19 secondsStandard Deviation 2.19
Exercise Only ArmChange in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG)-2.07 secondsStandard Deviation 5.82
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG)-0.78 secondsStandard Deviation 1.14
Secondary

Change in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels

Change in Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide blood samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels0.32 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.72
Diet Only ArmChange in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels0.04 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.56
Exercise Only ArmChange in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels-0.72 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.25
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels-0.36 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.56
Secondary

Change in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels

Change in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide blood samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels-1.85 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.45
Diet Only ArmChange in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels-0.70 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.12
Exercise Only ArmChange in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels-0.25 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.78
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels-0.12 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.92
Secondary

Change in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS)

Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality temporal summation (TS). TS assesses sensitivity to sharpness by applying a brief pinprick stimulus (256 mN Pinprick; MRC-Systems, Heidelberg, Germany) to the skin with higher ratings potentially suggesting increased spinal cord pain sensitivity. A single stimulus was applied to the rectus femoris (5cm above the mid-point of the patella of the most painful knee), followed by 10 repetitive stimuli at 1/s. Participants rated pain/sharpness intensity on a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale after both the single and the average of the repeated stimuli. Each test was performed twice, with a 2-minute break between repetitions and the average was taken.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS)0.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Diet Only ArmChange in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS)-0.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Exercise Only ArmChange in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS)-0.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS)-0.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.01
Secondary

Change in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels

Serum levels of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid will be measured using mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). This will help us ascertain the change in levels of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid in response to the intervention.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide blood samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels35.45 nMStandard Deviation 72.07
Diet Only ArmChange in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels6.28 nMStandard Deviation 44.17
Exercise Only ArmChange in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels37.58 nMStandard Deviation 78.17
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels16.83 nMStandard Deviation 79.1
Secondary

Change in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels

Serum levels of Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) will be measured using mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). This will help us ascertain the change in levels of Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) in response to the intervention.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide blood samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels0.32 nMStandard Deviation 0.82
Diet Only ArmChange in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels0.05 nMStandard Deviation 0.66
Exercise Only ArmChange in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels0.05 nMStandard Deviation 0.7
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels0.31 nMStandard Deviation 0.77
Secondary

Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid

Change in serum levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) acetic acid in response to theinterventions. SCFA levels in serum will be measured using mass spectrometry.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: This analysis excludes individuals who either did not provide blood samples or whose values fell belowthe detection limit and thus did not pass quality control.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid-869.59 ng/mlStandard Error 3744.05
Diet Only ArmChange in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid306.32 ng/mlStandard Error 1406.99
Exercise Only ArmChange in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid-1081.01 ng/mlStandard Error 3561.43
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid110.37 ng/mlStandard Error 3334.09
Secondary

Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid

Change in serum levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyric acid in response to the interventions. SCFA levels in serum will be measured using mass spectrometry.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: This analysis excludes individuals who either did not provide blood samples or whose values fell below the detection limit and thus did not pass quality control.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid-36.67 ng/mlStandard Error 1082.93
Diet Only ArmChange in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid345.61 ng/mlStandard Error 434.3
Exercise Only ArmChange in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid-233.17 ng/mlStandard Error 991.08
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid769.14 ng/mlStandard Error 3413.58
Secondary

Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels

Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide blood samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChange in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels-0.52 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.43
Diet Only ArmChange in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels-0.72 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.92
Exercise Only ArmChange in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels-0.39 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.8
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChange in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels-0.34 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.78
Secondary

Changes in Calcium Voltage-gated Channel Subunit alpha1 B Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals

Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood, and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: This analysis was conducted on a subset of samples from the Exercise-only and Diet + Exercise intervention arms, as it was designed to assess the effects of exercise alone, as well as the combined effects of exercise and diet, on gene expression. We specifically examined changes in the expression levels (fold change) of a predefined pain-related gene, calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, between baseline and follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChanges in Calcium Voltage-gated Channel Subunit alpha1 B Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals26.37 fold changeStandard Error 79.6
Diet Only ArmChanges in Calcium Voltage-gated Channel Subunit alpha1 B Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals49.50 fold changeStandard Error 140.48
Secondary

Changes in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index)

The gut microbiome will be measured with shotgun metagenomic sequencing of stool samples and the Shannon Diversity Index will be calculated. The Shannon Diversity Index assesses both the richness (number of different species) and evenness (distribution of individuals among species) within the gut microbiome. A higher Shannon index indicates a more diverse microbiome, while a lower index suggests less diversity.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide stool samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChanges in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index)0.01 indexStandard Deviation 0.26
Diet Only ArmChanges in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index)-0.07 indexStandard Deviation 0.26
Exercise Only ArmChanges in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index)-0.09 indexStandard Deviation 0.31
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChanges in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index)-0.08 indexStandard Deviation 0.33
Secondary

Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site

Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: brachioradialis (5 cm medial and distal to the lateral epicondyle) on the arm opposite the painful knee. PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the arm opposite the painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site-27.77 kPaStandard Deviation 107.82
Diet Only ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site-69.33 kPaStandard Deviation 119.04
Exercise Only ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site-37.31 kPaStandard Deviation 95.64
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site-25.75 kPaStandard Deviation 150.32
Secondary

Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site

Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from abeline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at the anatomical position: medial joint line (3cm medially from medial edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site-54.54 kPaStandard Deviation 132.9
Diet Only ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site-31.72 kPaStandard Deviation 132.51
Exercise Only ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site-10.91 kPaStandard Deviation 149.56
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site-24.02 kPaStandard Deviation 160.48
Secondary

Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site

Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: quadricep (2cm above superolateral edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site-87.19 kPaStandard Deviation 103.53
Diet Only ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site-29.89 kPaStandard Deviation 175.35
Exercise Only ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site-92.74 kPaStandard Deviation 159.03
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site-39.22 kPaStandard Deviation 240.27
Secondary

Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site

Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: quadricep (2cm above superomedial edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site-46.73 kPaStandard Deviation 137.77
Diet Only ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site-25.33 kPaStandard Deviation 122.58
Exercise Only ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site-41.25 kPaStandard Deviation 126.96
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site-22.28 kPaStandard Deviation 131.1
Secondary

Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site

Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: tibialis anterior (5 cm distal and 1 cm lateral to the tibial tuberosity). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site-47.36 kPaStandard Deviation 160.31
Diet Only ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site-17.57 kPaStandard Deviation 161.22
Exercise Only ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site-7.74 kPaStandard Deviation 122.59
Diet + Exercise Intervention ArmChanges in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site-20.66 kPaStandard Deviation 180.73
Secondary

Changes in Sodium Voltage-gated Channel Alpha Subunit 11 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals

Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected atbaseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood,and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: This analysis was conducted on a subset of samples from the Exercise-only and Diet + Exercise intervention arms, as it was designed to assess the effects of exercise alone, as well as the combined effects of exercise and diet, on gene expression. We specifically examined changes in the expression levels (fold change) of a predefined pain-related gene, sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 11, between baseline and follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChanges in Sodium Voltage-gated Channel Alpha Subunit 11 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals12.26 fold changeStandard Error 33.7
Diet Only ArmChanges in Sodium Voltage-gated Channel Alpha Subunit 11 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals31.97 fold changeStandard Error 90.21
Secondary

Changes in Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 5 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals

Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood, and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

Population: This analysis was conducted on a subset of samples from the Exercise-only and Diet + Exercise intervention arms, as it was designed to assess the effects of exercise alone, as well as the combined effects of exercise and diet, on gene expression. We specifically examined changes in the expression levels (fold change) of a predefined pain-related gene, solute carrier family 12 member 5, between baseline and follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ArmChanges in Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 5 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals14.02 fold changeStandard Error 41.6
Diet Only ArmChanges in Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 5 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals20.75 fold changeStandard Error 59.51

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026