Osteoarthritis, Knee
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a 2x2 factorial design randomised controlled trial in which participants with knee pain will be grouped into the diet intervention, exercise intervention, diet and exercise intervention or placebo arm. The study involves intake of dietary supplements and performing routine exercises which are commonly used and are not pharmacological agents. N= 117. 2x2 intervention with individuals per block: placebo (n=27), diet only (n=26), exercise only (n=40), diet + exercise (n=24)
Interventions
20g/ day. Inulin is easily dissolvable in liquid and can be incorporated into the usual diet - by adding to water, juice, smoothies, cereal, yogurt etc.
10g/ day which can be consumed by adding to breakfast cereal/ smoothie/ yogurt or drink of choice
Joint Academy An app-based exercises platform (Joint Academy®) will be used as an intervention given to the treatment arm. The programme consists of a mixture of open and close chain exercises, a combination of concentric, eccentric and focusing on the global strength of legs including the muscles around the hips and knee joints as well as balance enhancement exercises.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Randomisation will be performed using an online software (sealedenvelope.com). The inulin vs placebo allocation will be double blinded. The exercise part of the intervention will not be blinded
Intervention model description
2x2 intervention with individuals per block: placebo (n=27), diet only (n=26), exercise only (n=40), diet + exercise (n=24)
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participants with any pain in or around a knee on most days for more than 3 months * Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study * Participant eligibility includes those aged \>18 years who have a body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 39.9 kg/m2
Exclusion criteria
The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following apply: * Have psychosocial or gastrointestinal (e.g. malabsorptive conditions such as IBS/IBD, coeliac) * Are taking the following medications: immunosuppressants, anticoagulants, amiodarone and/or perhexiline * Are currently following or anticipated to commence a specialised commercially available weight loss diet and/or program * Pregnant or breast feeding * History or current psychiatric illness * History or current neurological condition (e.g. epilepsy) * Those undergoing revision, having severe hip OA, inflammatory arthropathies * Diagnosed non-OA cause of knee pain (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) * Neuropathy or diabetes mellitus * Having taken part in a research study in the last 3 months involving invasive procedures or an inconvenience allowance (this must remain for ALL UoN FMHS UREC approved studies)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain | Baseline and 6 weeks | The Numerical Rate Score (NRS) will be used to assess the changes in the level of pain in response to the intervention between baseline and follow-up. Participants reported their pain on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG) | Baseline and 6 weeks | Time in seconds to stand up, walk 3m, return, and sit. Average of 3 trials at baseline and follow-up (at the end of 6 weeks). |
| Change in Functional Outcome Grip Strength | Baseline and 6 weeks | Measured with dynamometer; average of 3 trials on dominant hand in seated position with participant applying as much grip pressure as possible on the dynamometer. The maximum reading (kg) in taken for each repetition. |
| Change in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS) | Baseline and 6 weeks | Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality temporal summation (TS). TS assesses sensitivity to sharpness by applying a brief pinprick stimulus (256 mN Pinprick; MRC-Systems, Heidelberg, Germany) to the skin with higher ratings potentially suggesting increased spinal cord pain sensitivity. A single stimulus was applied to the rectus femoris (5cm above the mid-point of the patella of the most painful knee), followed by 10 repetitive stimuli at 1/s. Participants rated pain/sharpness intensity on a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale after both the single and the average of the repeated stimuli. Each test was performed twice, with a 2-minute break between repetitions and the average was taken. |
| Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site | Baseline and 6 weeks | Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: quadricep (2cm above superolateral edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity. |
| Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site | Baseline and 6 weeks | Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: quadricep (2cm above superomedial edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity. |
| Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site | Baseline and 6 weeks | Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from abeline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at the anatomical position: medial joint line (3cm medially from medial edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity. |
| Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site | Baseline and 6 weeks | Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: tibialis anterior (5 cm distal and 1 cm lateral to the tibial tuberosity). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity. |
| Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site | Baseline and 6 weeks | Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: brachioradialis (5 cm medial and distal to the lateral epicondyle) on the arm opposite the painful knee. PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the arm opposite the painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity. |
| Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid | Baseline and 6 weeks | Change in serum levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyric acid in response to the interventions. SCFA levels in serum will be measured using mass spectrometry. |
| Change in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST) | Baseline and 6 weeks | Measures how many times a participant can rise from a chair to a full standing position in 30 seconds. |
| Change in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels | Baseline and 6 weeks | Change in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays. |
| Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels | Baseline and 6 weeks | Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays. |
| Change in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels | Baseline and 6 weeks | Change in Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays. |
| Changes in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index) | Baseline and 6 weeks | The gut microbiome will be measured with shotgun metagenomic sequencing of stool samples and the Shannon Diversity Index will be calculated. The Shannon Diversity Index assesses both the richness (number of different species) and evenness (distribution of individuals among species) within the gut microbiome. A higher Shannon index indicates a more diverse microbiome, while a lower index suggests less diversity. |
| Change in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels | Baseline and 6 weeks | Serum levels of Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) will be measured using mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). This will help us ascertain the change in levels of Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) in response to the intervention. |
| Change in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels | Baseline and 6 weeks | Serum levels of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid will be measured using mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). This will help us ascertain the change in levels of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid in response to the intervention. |
| Changes in Calcium Voltage-gated Channel Subunit alpha1 B Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals | Baseline and 6 weeks | Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood, and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines. |
| Changes in Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 5 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals | Baseline and 6 weeks | Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood, and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines. |
| Changes in Sodium Voltage-gated Channel Alpha Subunit 11 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals | Baseline and 6 weeks | Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected atbaseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood,and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines. |
| Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid | Baseline and 6 weeks | Change in serum levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) acetic acid in response to theinterventions. SCFA levels in serum will be measured using mass spectrometry. |
Countries
United Kingdom
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Arm The participants in the placebo/control arm will be required to take 10g of maltodextrin for the same period of 6 weeks. | 27 |
| Diet Only Arm The participants in the dietary intervention arm will be required to take 20g of inulin for a period of 6 weeks. | 26 |
| Exercise Only Arm Joint Academy An app-based exercises platform (Joint Academy®) will be used as an intervention given to the treatment arm. The programme consists of a mixture of open and close chain exercises, a combination of concentric, eccentric and focusing on the global strength of legs including the muscles around the hips and knee joints as well as balance enhancement exercises. The intervention also includes educational sessions integrated into the programme covering the basics of OA, its treatment, self-managing symptoms of OA and the benefits of maintaining a healthy lifestyle. The exercise intervention focuses on core stability and performance, neuromuscular leg strengthening and balance enhancement. | 40 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm The participants in this arm will be required to take 20g of inulin for a period of 6 weeks and doing exercise at the same time. | 24 |
| Total | 117 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo Arm | Diet Only Arm | Exercise Only Arm | Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 69.59 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.41 | 66.54 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.39 | 67.75 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.22 | 66.71 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.44 | 67.69 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.48 |
| Body mass index | 29.60 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.65 | 30.15 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.75 | 29.00 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.15 | 29.60 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.65 | 29.48 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.32 |
| Pain Numerical Rating Scale | 3.52 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.77 | 4.06 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.85 | 4.21 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.88 | 3.92 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75 | 3.96 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.67 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 14 Participants | 14 Participants | 26 Participants | 14 Participants | 68 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 13 Participants | 12 Participants | 14 Participants | 10 Participants | 49 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 27 | 0 / 26 | 0 / 40 | 0 / 24 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 27 | 10 / 26 | 0 / 40 | 13 / 24 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 27 | 0 / 26 | 0 / 40 | 0 / 24 |
Outcome results
Change in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain
The Numerical Rate Score (NRS) will be used to assess the changes in the level of pain in response to the intervention between baseline and follow-up. Participants reported their pain on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain | 0.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain | -0.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.32 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain | -1.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.69 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain | -1.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.76 |
Change in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST)
Measures how many times a participant can rise from a chair to a full standing position in 30 seconds.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST) | 1.23 stands | Standard Deviation 1.67 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST) | 2.12 stands | Standard Deviation 3.02 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST) | 2.54 stands | Standard Deviation 3.38 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST) | 3.21 stands | Standard Deviation 5.37 |
Change in Functional Outcome Grip Strength
Measured with dynamometer; average of 3 trials on dominant hand in seated position with participant applying as much grip pressure as possible on the dynamometer. The maximum reading (kg) in taken for each repetition.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Functional Outcome Grip Strength | -1.43 kg | Standard Deviation 6.44 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Functional Outcome Grip Strength | 0.76 kg | Standard Deviation 3.42 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Functional Outcome Grip Strength | 0.02 kg | Standard Deviation 5.62 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Functional Outcome Grip Strength | 0.76 kg | Standard Deviation 3.42 |
Change in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG)
Time in seconds to stand up, walk 3m, return, and sit. Average of 3 trials at baseline and follow-up (at the end of 6 weeks).
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG) | -0.43 seconds | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG) | -1.19 seconds | Standard Deviation 2.19 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG) | -2.07 seconds | Standard Deviation 5.82 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG) | -0.78 seconds | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
Change in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels
Change in Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide blood samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels | 0.32 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.72 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels | 0.04 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.56 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels | -0.72 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.25 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels | -0.36 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.56 |
Change in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels
Change in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide blood samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels | -1.85 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.45 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels | -0.70 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.12 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels | -0.25 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels | -0.12 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.92 |
Change in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS)
Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality temporal summation (TS). TS assesses sensitivity to sharpness by applying a brief pinprick stimulus (256 mN Pinprick; MRC-Systems, Heidelberg, Germany) to the skin with higher ratings potentially suggesting increased spinal cord pain sensitivity. A single stimulus was applied to the rectus femoris (5cm above the mid-point of the patella of the most painful knee), followed by 10 repetitive stimuli at 1/s. Participants rated pain/sharpness intensity on a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale after both the single and the average of the repeated stimuli. Each test was performed twice, with a 2-minute break between repetitions and the average was taken.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS) | 0.30 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.66 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS) | -0.20 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.52 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS) | -0.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.62 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS) | -0.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.01 |
Change in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels
Serum levels of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid will be measured using mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). This will help us ascertain the change in levels of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid in response to the intervention.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide blood samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels | 35.45 nM | Standard Deviation 72.07 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels | 6.28 nM | Standard Deviation 44.17 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels | 37.58 nM | Standard Deviation 78.17 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels | 16.83 nM | Standard Deviation 79.1 |
Change in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels
Serum levels of Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) will be measured using mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). This will help us ascertain the change in levels of Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) in response to the intervention.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide blood samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels | 0.32 nM | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels | 0.05 nM | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels | 0.05 nM | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels | 0.31 nM | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid
Change in serum levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) acetic acid in response to theinterventions. SCFA levels in serum will be measured using mass spectrometry.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Population: This analysis excludes individuals who either did not provide blood samples or whose values fell belowthe detection limit and thus did not pass quality control.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid | -869.59 ng/ml | Standard Error 3744.05 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid | 306.32 ng/ml | Standard Error 1406.99 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid | -1081.01 ng/ml | Standard Error 3561.43 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid | 110.37 ng/ml | Standard Error 3334.09 |
Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid
Change in serum levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyric acid in response to the interventions. SCFA levels in serum will be measured using mass spectrometry.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Population: This analysis excludes individuals who either did not provide blood samples or whose values fell below the detection limit and thus did not pass quality control.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid | -36.67 ng/ml | Standard Error 1082.93 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid | 345.61 ng/ml | Standard Error 434.3 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid | -233.17 ng/ml | Standard Error 991.08 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid | 769.14 ng/ml | Standard Error 3413.58 |
Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels
Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide blood samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels | -0.52 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.43 |
| Diet Only Arm | Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels | -0.72 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.92 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels | -0.39 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels | -0.34 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.78 |
Changes in Calcium Voltage-gated Channel Subunit alpha1 B Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals
Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood, and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Population: This analysis was conducted on a subset of samples from the Exercise-only and Diet + Exercise intervention arms, as it was designed to assess the effects of exercise alone, as well as the combined effects of exercise and diet, on gene expression. We specifically examined changes in the expression levels (fold change) of a predefined pain-related gene, calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 B, between baseline and follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Changes in Calcium Voltage-gated Channel Subunit alpha1 B Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals | 26.37 fold change | Standard Error 79.6 |
| Diet Only Arm | Changes in Calcium Voltage-gated Channel Subunit alpha1 B Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals | 49.50 fold change | Standard Error 140.48 |
Changes in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index)
The gut microbiome will be measured with shotgun metagenomic sequencing of stool samples and the Shannon Diversity Index will be calculated. The Shannon Diversity Index assesses both the richness (number of different species) and evenness (distribution of individuals among species) within the gut microbiome. A higher Shannon index indicates a more diverse microbiome, while a lower index suggests less diversity.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Population: This analysis excludes individuals who did not provide stool samples or whose values failed quality control or for which results were not obtained
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Changes in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index) | 0.01 index | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Diet Only Arm | Changes in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index) | -0.07 index | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Changes in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index) | -0.09 index | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Changes in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index) | -0.08 index | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site
Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: brachioradialis (5 cm medial and distal to the lateral epicondyle) on the arm opposite the painful knee. PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the arm opposite the painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site | -27.77 kPa | Standard Deviation 107.82 |
| Diet Only Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site | -69.33 kPa | Standard Deviation 119.04 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site | -37.31 kPa | Standard Deviation 95.64 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site | -25.75 kPa | Standard Deviation 150.32 |
Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site
Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from abeline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at the anatomical position: medial joint line (3cm medially from medial edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site | -54.54 kPa | Standard Deviation 132.9 |
| Diet Only Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site | -31.72 kPa | Standard Deviation 132.51 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site | -10.91 kPa | Standard Deviation 149.56 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site | -24.02 kPa | Standard Deviation 160.48 |
Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site
Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: quadricep (2cm above superolateral edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site | -87.19 kPa | Standard Deviation 103.53 |
| Diet Only Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site | -29.89 kPa | Standard Deviation 175.35 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site | -92.74 kPa | Standard Deviation 159.03 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site | -39.22 kPa | Standard Deviation 240.27 |
Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site
Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: quadricep (2cm above superomedial edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site | -46.73 kPa | Standard Deviation 137.77 |
| Diet Only Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site | -25.33 kPa | Standard Deviation 122.58 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site | -41.25 kPa | Standard Deviation 126.96 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site | -22.28 kPa | Standard Deviation 131.1 |
Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site
Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: tibialis anterior (5 cm distal and 1 cm lateral to the tibial tuberosity). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site | -47.36 kPa | Standard Deviation 160.31 |
| Diet Only Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site | -17.57 kPa | Standard Deviation 161.22 |
| Exercise Only Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site | -7.74 kPa | Standard Deviation 122.59 |
| Diet + Exercise Intervention Arm | Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site | -20.66 kPa | Standard Deviation 180.73 |
Changes in Sodium Voltage-gated Channel Alpha Subunit 11 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals
Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected atbaseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood,and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Population: This analysis was conducted on a subset of samples from the Exercise-only and Diet + Exercise intervention arms, as it was designed to assess the effects of exercise alone, as well as the combined effects of exercise and diet, on gene expression. We specifically examined changes in the expression levels (fold change) of a predefined pain-related gene, sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 11, between baseline and follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Changes in Sodium Voltage-gated Channel Alpha Subunit 11 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals | 12.26 fold change | Standard Error 33.7 |
| Diet Only Arm | Changes in Sodium Voltage-gated Channel Alpha Subunit 11 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals | 31.97 fold change | Standard Error 90.21 |
Changes in Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 5 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals
Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood, and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Population: This analysis was conducted on a subset of samples from the Exercise-only and Diet + Exercise intervention arms, as it was designed to assess the effects of exercise alone, as well as the combined effects of exercise and diet, on gene expression. We specifically examined changes in the expression levels (fold change) of a predefined pain-related gene, solute carrier family 12 member 5, between baseline and follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Arm | Changes in Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 5 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals | 14.02 fold change | Standard Error 41.6 |
| Diet Only Arm | Changes in Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 5 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals | 20.75 fold change | Standard Error 59.51 |