Skip to content

Cauterization of the Anterior Ethmoidal Artery by Transconjunctival Approach

Cauterization of the Anterior Ethmoidal Artery by Transconjunctival Approach

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05663099
Acronym
AEA
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-12-23
Start date
2023-02-07
Completion date
2024-02-07
Last updated
2023-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epistaxis, Anterior Ethmoid Artery

Keywords

Epistaxis, Anterior Ethmoid Artery, Arterial hypertension, Hemostasis disorders, Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery, Endonasal endoscopic, Anterior ethmoidectomy

Brief summary

The incidence of epistaxis varies from 7 to 14% in the general population and represents 30 per 100,000 emergency room admissions in adults. Most nasal bleeding is self-limiting without the need for specific medical treatment. Cauterization under local anesthesia and control of medical comorbidities (arterial hypertension and hemostasis disorders) are effective in most cases. In case of failure of cauterization or in case of more posterior epistaxis, an antero-posterior packing can be put in place for 48 hours. In case of failure or recurrence of packing removal, endoscopic sphenopalatine artery (SPA) ligation or embolization is proposed. In case of persistent epistaxis despite hemostasis of the PSA, ligation of the anterior ethmoidal artery (AEA) is recommended. This artery cannot be embolized because of the risk to the ophthalmic artery. The ligation of the AEA is most often performed via the external paracanthal approach. It can also be performed by endonasal endoscopic approach but involves the performance of an anterior ethmoidectomy, a long surgery with a significant risk of complications. Its identification by the endonasal route is complicated in the event of abundant bleeding. Moreover, its endoscopic cauterization is difficult if the artery is not procidente. The transconjunctival approach avoids a visible scar and the complications of an ethmoidectomy.

Detailed description

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of transconjunctival and external cauterization of the anterior ethmoidal artery in patients with refractory epistaxis

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female (age ≥18 years) * Persistent epistaxis after meching * Having required transconjunctival anterior ethmoidal artery cauterization surgery * Subject operated at the University Hospitals of Strasbourg between 01/01/2015 and 01/05/2023 * Subject not objecting to the reuse of his/her data for scientific research purposes.

Exclusion criteria

\- Subject who has expressed opposition to the reuse of his/her data for scientific research purposes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To retrospectively compare the efficacy of transconjunctival and external cauterization of the anterior ethmoidal artery in patients with refractory epistaxisFiles analysed retrospectively from January 01, 2015 to May 01, 2023 will be examinedThe endpoint is the efficacy of the technique with the presence of postoperative epistaxis recurrence

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactLéa FATH, MD
lea.fath@chru-strasbourg.fr33 3 88 12 64 98

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026