Arrhythmia-induced Cardiomyopathy (AiCM), Cardiomyopathy
Conditions
Keywords
atrial fibrillation (AF), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), ventricular tachycardia, atrial flutter, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE), cardiac arrhythmia
Brief summary
The goal of the this observational study is to gather clinically available data on patients presenting with a suspicion for arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AiCM) at the University Hospital Basel.
Detailed description
Current studies indicate that AiCM is an under-recognized and an underestimated clinical entity and its prevalence is poorly documented. This project consists of a retrospective longitudinal cohort and case-control study followed by a prospective observational cohort study. The retrospective pilot study (1200 patients) is to define the incidence of AiCM in patients who presented to the University Hospital of Basel with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction before or after the diagnosis of an arrhythmia suggestive to lead to an AiCM. The prospective study part (1500 patients) is to evaluate the predictors of adverse events and re-hospitalizations in patients with a suspicion of AiCM. The diagnosis of AiCM will be established using a goldstandard diagnosis: 2 independent cardiologists will adjudicate the diagnosis based on all data from the initial hospital stay and follow-up including ECG, laboratory measurements, vital signs, echocardiography, coronary angiography, stress testing and other cardiovascular diagnostic steps. The most likely diagnosis will be chosen among a list of comprehensive, pre-selected choices. In cases of disagreement of the two reviewers, diagnosis will be discussed with a third senior physician and decision made. In order to optimize the care of patients with AiCM, the researchers intend to determine the prevalence of AICM, evaluate diagnostic criteria that allow an early diagnosis of AICM, and evaluate the current therapeutic management and prognosis of patients with AICM.
Interventions
OTHERData collection: Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) assessment questionnaire (prospective part)
Data collection: Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) assessment questionnaire (prospective part). The assessment will be done via mail, letter or phone
OTHERData collection: Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire (prospective part)
Data collection: Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire (prospective part). The questionnaire EQ-5D-5L questionnaire will be used to assess quality of life.
OTHERData collection (retrospective study)
Anonymized search and review of patients electronic health records of the University Hospital of Basel for patients with a reduced LVEF and a concomitant (±1year or after any observation of a reduced LVEF in imaging) diagnosis of arrhythmia known to be causing AiCM.
OTHERData collection (prospective study database)
Data collection on alcohol consumption, family history, rhythm disorder, hospitalizations, cardiac assessments, adverse events at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years.
Sponsors
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Prospective part Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnostic or suspicion of AiCM as presence of specified keyword in patient's file or as screened by colleagues of the internal medicine or cardiology clinics * Signed study consent
Exclusion criteria
* Patient's active refusal of the general consent of the University Hospital Basel * Age \<18 years old * Temporary
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of AiCM (retrospective part of the study) | one time data extraction and analysis at baseline | Categorization (based on a diagnostic algorithm) into 4 categories: Likely AiCM, possibly AiCM, unlikely AiCM and Diagnostic work-up and longitudinal assessment insufficient to establish diagnosis done by study team. AiCM will be defined as the presence of a reduced (\<50%) ejection fraction in a transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with a concomitant diagnosis of an arrhythmia present in the electronic patient's chart 6 months before or after the date of the diagnostic study. |
| Incidence of AiCM (Prospective part of the study) | at 1 year Follow- up | Categorization using a goldstandard diagnosis (GSD): diagnosis by 2 independent cardiologists based on all data from the initial hospital stay and follow-up. The most likely diagnosis will be chosen among a list of comprehensive, pre-selected choices (Standard operating procedures (SOP) provided to the adjudicators to ensure homogenous knowledge and adjudication process. The booklet will contain information from the guidelines and position papers) |
| Change in Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) assessment questionnaire | at 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year Follow- up | MACE is a composite endpoint of nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of hybrid (both antiarrhythmics and ablation) or a sequential (first anti-arrhythmic and then ablation) therapeutic options (prospective part) | one time data extraction and analysis | Data generated by patient's chart review and automated IT export |
| Percentage of patients in whom a diagnosis of AiCM could be diagnosed or excluded with certainty per goldstandard diagnosis. (prospective part) | up to 5 years | Data generated by patient's chart review and automated IT export |
| Change in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) quality of life (QoL) questionnaire in patients with and without a arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (prospective part) | at 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year Follow- up | The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 parts: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement. |
| Number of patients with tachymyopathies (prospective part) | up to 5 years | supraventricular tachycardias such as atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia vs premature-ventricular complex induced arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy versus right-ventricle pacing induced arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy |
| Percentage of patients in whom a diagnosis of AiCM could not surely be established and/or where an overlap with another cause of cardiomyopathy was present per goldstandard diagnosis. (prospective part) | up to 5 years | Data generated by patient's chart review and automated IT export |
| Percentage of patients in whom the goldstandard diagnosis procedures came to a different diagnosis than the one done by the clinician. (prospective part) | up to 5 years | Data generated by patient's chart review and automated IT export |
Countries
Switzerland
Contacts
Primary ContactPatrick Badertscher, MD
Backup ContactJeanne du Fay de Lavallaz, MD-PhD
Outcome results
None listed