Hypertension
Conditions
Keywords
Telemonitoring, Hypertension, E-Health, Coaching
Brief summary
Rationale: Hypertension is the most significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and can be mitigated by lifestyle and medical management. Telemonitoring as a novel management approach to perform hypertension management at distance has been thriving but became indispensable during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, evidence of an effective implementation for telemonitoring remains to be elucidated. Hypothesis: Telemonitoring with a smartphone application, which includes mixed automated services for a personal counselling program (PCP), on top of self-monitoring (SM) will lead to improvement of hypertension control rates, medication adherence and lifestyle behaviors and lower health care costs in patients with hypertension when compared to usual care. Objective: To investigate the effects of PCP+SM on hypertension control rate and lifestyle behaviors as compared with usual care. Study design: The study is a non-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial in adults with hypertension, in a multicenter hospital setting . We will randomize participants in a 1:1 fashion to the intervention group (PCP+SM), or to the control group (usual care). Study population: 400 patients, patients, aged ≥18 years with hypertension (RR \>140/90) Main study outcome: hypertension control rate (%\<140/90mmHg) after 6 months (as measured by the SPRINT protocol)
Interventions
Using a digital mobile phone based telemonitoring platform to A: monitor patients and adjust their treatment accordingly based on the remote monitoring outcomes and B: provide E-Coaching/self learning modules (lifestyle)
Standard outpatient blood pressure management
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age ≥18 years * Hypertension (\>140/90) * Have and use a smartphone or a partner/caregiver who is able to provide the necessary technical support * Able to provide written informed consent prior to participation in the study
Exclusion criteria
* Current user of a blood pressure monitor apporoved by the Dutch Heart foundation in combination with the Luscii app * Persistent atrial fibrillation as indicated in the electronic health record (EHR) * Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study period * Severe kidney disease, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate \<30 per 1.73 m2 or currently on renal replacement therapy (i.e. hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) * Unable to communicate (not language specific) * Recent cardiovascular event (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting) in the past 3 months * Diagnosis of dementia, psychosis as indicated in the electronic health record * Life expectancy \<1 year, for instance in terminal cancer or NYHA III or IV heart failure * Individuals requiring BP monitor cuff size larger than 42cm * Patients with proven secondary cause of hypertension for which drug treatment is not first choice (e.g. excessive licorice use, proven renal artery stenosis etc)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hypertension control rate | 6 months | Percentage of patients with blood pressure on target (RR\<135/85) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Medication use | 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months | Biochemical assessment of antihypertensive medication concentrations in blood. Number of antihypertensive agents used at 6 months. Number of antihypertensive medication changes at 6 months. |
| Self-management | baseline and 6 months | Self-efficacy to monitor blood pressure, effect of coaching on disease insight and skills using PAM 13 and EQ5DL questionnaires |
| Patient and Healthcare provider Satisfaction | 6 months and 12 months | Patients and health-care provider satisfaction as measured with TUQ and MAUQ questionnaires. The scales are from 1 to 7 (disagree to agree) |
| Hospitalizations | 6 months and 12 months | Hospitalizations resulting from poor blood pressure control or cardiovascular complications resulting from poor blood pressure control (hypertensive emergencies, MI's, stroke) |
| Adverse cardiovascular events | 6 months and 12 months | Myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events and hypertensive emergencies. |
| Blood pressure control | 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months | Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures for both groups |
| Direct Medical Costs | 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months | * Costs related to HBPT (blood pressure monitor costs) * Costs related to additional prescribing of antihypertensive drugs * Costs related to a physical appointment for patients in a hypertension care pathway * Costs related to reimbursement for patients in a HBPT program * Costs related to hospital admissions resulting primarily from poorly controlled hypertension or hypertensive emergencies. * Costs related to hospital admissions or required care pathways following a cardiovascular complication as a result from poorly controlled hypertension * Future related medical costs |
| Direct Non-Medical Costs | 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months | * Training costs related to the use of HBPT for both telenurses, nurse specialists and clinicians * Development and exploitation costs (time spent developing the HBPT protocol, license costs for the application) * Salaries for involved health care providers during HBPT |
| Indirect Non-Medical costs | 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months | * Costs related to work absence (loss of productivity for short-term absence, friction cost for long-term absence) * Costs related to the hospital visit (travel costs, parking costs) |
| Indirect medical costs | 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months | o Future unrelated medical costs (as calculated using the iMTA PAID module: costs related to other diseases due to improved life expectancy |
| Hypertension control rate | 6 weeks and 12 months | Percentage of patients with blood pressure on target (RR\<140/90) |
Countries
Netherlands