Skip to content

Telemonitoring and E-Coaching in Hypertension

Telemonitoring and E-Coaching in Hypertension

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05660226
Acronym
TECH
Enrollment
400
Registered
2022-12-21
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2023-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Keywords

Telemonitoring, Hypertension, E-Health, Coaching

Brief summary

Rationale: Hypertension is the most significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and can be mitigated by lifestyle and medical management. Telemonitoring as a novel management approach to perform hypertension management at distance has been thriving but became indispensable during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, evidence of an effective implementation for telemonitoring remains to be elucidated. Hypothesis: Telemonitoring with a smartphone application, which includes mixed automated services for a personal counselling program (PCP), on top of self-monitoring (SM) will lead to improvement of hypertension control rates, medication adherence and lifestyle behaviors and lower health care costs in patients with hypertension when compared to usual care. Objective: To investigate the effects of PCP+SM on hypertension control rate and lifestyle behaviors as compared with usual care. Study design: The study is a non-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial in adults with hypertension, in a multicenter hospital setting . We will randomize participants in a 1:1 fashion to the intervention group (PCP+SM), or to the control group (usual care). Study population: 400 patients, patients, aged ≥18 years with hypertension (RR \>140/90) Main study outcome: hypertension control rate (%\<140/90mmHg) after 6 months (as measured by the SPRINT protocol)

Interventions

OTHERHome blood pressure monitoring (telemonitoring)

Using a digital mobile phone based telemonitoring platform to A: monitor patients and adjust their treatment accordingly based on the remote monitoring outcomes and B: provide E-Coaching/self learning modules (lifestyle)

OTHERStandard care

Standard outpatient blood pressure management

Sponsors

Erasmus Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Albert Schweitzer Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Sint Franciscus Gasthuis
CollaboratorOTHER
Maasstad Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Hypertension (\>140/90) * Have and use a smartphone or a partner/caregiver who is able to provide the necessary technical support * Able to provide written informed consent prior to participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Current user of a blood pressure monitor apporoved by the Dutch Heart foundation in combination with the Luscii app * Persistent atrial fibrillation as indicated in the electronic health record (EHR) * Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study period * Severe kidney disease, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate \<30 per 1.73 m2 or currently on renal replacement therapy (i.e. hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) * Unable to communicate (not language specific) * Recent cardiovascular event (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting) in the past 3 months * Diagnosis of dementia, psychosis as indicated in the electronic health record * Life expectancy \<1 year, for instance in terminal cancer or NYHA III or IV heart failure * Individuals requiring BP monitor cuff size larger than 42cm * Patients with proven secondary cause of hypertension for which drug treatment is not first choice (e.g. excessive licorice use, proven renal artery stenosis etc)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypertension control rate6 monthsPercentage of patients with blood pressure on target (RR\<135/85)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medication use6 weeks, 6 months and 12 monthsBiochemical assessment of antihypertensive medication concentrations in blood. Number of antihypertensive agents used at 6 months. Number of antihypertensive medication changes at 6 months.
Self-managementbaseline and 6 monthsSelf-efficacy to monitor blood pressure, effect of coaching on disease insight and skills using PAM 13 and EQ5DL questionnaires
Patient and Healthcare provider Satisfaction6 months and 12 monthsPatients and health-care provider satisfaction as measured with TUQ and MAUQ questionnaires. The scales are from 1 to 7 (disagree to agree)
Hospitalizations6 months and 12 monthsHospitalizations resulting from poor blood pressure control or cardiovascular complications resulting from poor blood pressure control (hypertensive emergencies, MI's, stroke)
Adverse cardiovascular events6 months and 12 monthsMyocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events and hypertensive emergencies.
Blood pressure control6 weeks, 6 months and 12 monthsMean systolic and diastolic blood pressures for both groups
Direct Medical Costs6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months* Costs related to HBPT (blood pressure monitor costs) * Costs related to additional prescribing of antihypertensive drugs * Costs related to a physical appointment for patients in a hypertension care pathway * Costs related to reimbursement for patients in a HBPT program * Costs related to hospital admissions resulting primarily from poorly controlled hypertension or hypertensive emergencies. * Costs related to hospital admissions or required care pathways following a cardiovascular complication as a result from poorly controlled hypertension * Future related medical costs
Direct Non-Medical Costs6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months* Training costs related to the use of HBPT for both telenurses, nurse specialists and clinicians * Development and exploitation costs (time spent developing the HBPT protocol, license costs for the application) * Salaries for involved health care providers during HBPT
Indirect Non-Medical costs6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months* Costs related to work absence (loss of productivity for short-term absence, friction cost for long-term absence) * Costs related to the hospital visit (travel costs, parking costs)
Indirect medical costs6 weeks, 6 months and 12 monthso Future unrelated medical costs (as calculated using the iMTA PAID module: costs related to other diseases due to improved life expectancy
Hypertension control rate6 weeks and 12 monthsPercentage of patients with blood pressure on target (RR\<140/90)

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactJob van Steenkiste, MD
jobvansteenkiste@gmail.com+31631799089
Backup ContactSjaam Jainandunsing, MD,PhD
jainandunsingS@maasstadziekenhuis.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026