Skip to content

Comparison of Alfredson and Silbernagel Protocol in Competitive Athletes With Achilles Tendinopathy

Comparison of Alfredson Eccentric and Silbernagel Concentric-eccentric Therapeutical Protocol in Competitive Athletes With Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05659134
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-12-21
Start date
2022-12-02
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2024-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Achilles Tendinopathy, Pain, Chronic, Tendon Injuries, Tendon Thickening

Keywords

Achilles tendinopathy, VISA-A, Ultrasound, Stiffness, Competitive athletes, Exercise therapy, Alfredson protocol, Silbernagel protocol

Brief summary

A 6-week randomized clinical trial (RCT) with a 46-week follow-up compared the effect of Alfredson and Silbernagel eccentric programs for the treatment of AT. The primary outcome was a change in the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) scale from baseline to 12 months. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University (Project number: 254/2021). All participants provided written informed consent before participation.

Interventions

Alfredson eccentric therapeutical protocol.

Silbernagel concentric-eccentric protocol.

Sponsors

Charles University, Czech Republic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Athletes performing track and field, tennis or football at the competitive level * Age 18 to 40 years * Unilateral Achilles tendinopathy * Pain lasting more than 2 months * Diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy established by pain on function at the Achilles region and ultrasound assessment (tendon thickening, swollen tendon) by one researcher * Participants trained at least 3 times per week before the onset of Achilles tendinopathy * Less than 3 months without training and less than 6 months from the last competition/match * Wish to return to original sport level * Willing to stop with other treatments 2 weeks before the start of the clinical trial

Exclusion criteria

* Achilles tendon rupture in past * Corticosteroid injection in Achilles tendon region in last 6 months * Having other lower limb musculoskeletal injuries or surgery in the last 6 months (e.g., muscle rupture, bone fracture) * Having a neurological, systemic or autoimmune disease (e.g., neuropathy, type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A)1 yearThe VISA-A questionnaire is the most commonly used outcome in clinical trials of Achilles tendinopathy treatment with proven reliability and validity. It consists of eight questions covering pain, function, daily living and sports activities. The score ranges from 0-100 where 0 means disability (impairment of function and pain of Achilles tendon) and 100 represents no disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biomechanical properties - stiffness6 weeksAchilles tendon stiffness (N/m) is a measure of the biomechanical response of the Achilles tendon tissue. Stiffness was assessed by MyotonPro (Myoton AS), which has been shown as a valid and reliable measurement tool of Achilles tendon mechanical properties in the clinical setting.
Structure - micromorphology6 weeksFibre organisation analysis of PSFR (mmˆ-1).

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026